Comments on: Live blogging the Justice Sunday II conference http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/14/justicesunday/ Don't dis or dismiss this miss! Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:59:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Danny Carlton: codenamed "Jack Lewis" http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/14/justicesunday/comment-page-1/#comment-17184 Danny Carlton: codenamed "Jack Lewis" Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:50:08 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/14/justicesunday/#comment-17184 <strong>Justice Sunday II</strong> We do not claim the right to speak for everyone but we do claim the right to speak, and... Justice Sunday II

We do not claim the right to speak for everyone but we do claim the right to speak, and…

]]> By: Red Tory http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/14/justicesunday/comment-page-1/#comment-17074 Red Tory Mon, 15 Aug 2005 02:24:10 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/08/14/justicesunday/#comment-17074 <strong>From ST:</strong> Red Tory, I've been waiting for your arrival. Via Sitemeter, I saw that my post about Cindy Sheehan had been linked up at one of the Air America blogs by a poster there to be discussed. Two other members of the discussion there have already been here posting here, civilly, but I'll talk to them about this in the other thread. This particular comment is for you. You posted later on in the thread there at the Air America blog at 8:59 p.m.: <strong>"Perhaps I'll go put her to the test. Let's see how quickly I can get banned by THIS nitwit."</strong> Congratulations. This "nitwit" just banned you. It's really a shame it had to be this way. But you see I'm not really into letting people post here who insult me on other blogs behind my back. I'm sure you understand, as you have a blog of your own. I see you have posted a copy of the message you posted here in this thread there at the AA blog to brag to other people there about what you wrote. I'm glad you did, because it wasn't going to stay up here. You had no intentions of having a rational dialogue with me when you first came here and accordingly, I have no intentions of allowing you to stay here and post about how much you hate Christian conservatives, especially considering you think THIS Christian conservative is a "nitwit." You won't be able to see this, but no doubt some of your pals at AA will see this and repost it for you to see at your own blog. And as is your right, you'll no doubt slander me at the AA blog for "banning you for merely disagreeing with the blog hostess" when that isn't the reason at all. The reason is you shouldn't have disrespected me before you even got to know me. You deliberately came over here and started posting in order to antagonize me and belittle my beliefs. At least the other two people who came over from the AA blog gave me a chance to explain my position once they got here and we engaged in a civilized debate about the Sheehan issue. You, OTOH, didn't and immediately went for talking down to me. That's very junior-highish, and it won't be tolerated here. So have fun dissing me all you want there. Because you (and your pals there) won't be allowed to do it here. --ST From ST: Red Tory, I’ve been waiting for your arrival. Via Sitemeter, I saw that my post about Cindy Sheehan had been linked up at one of the Air America blogs by a poster there to be discussed. Two other members of the discussion there have already been here posting here, civilly, but I’ll talk to them about this in the other thread. This particular comment is for you.

You posted later on in the thread there at the Air America blog at 8:59 p.m.:

“Perhaps I’ll go put her to the test. Let’s see how quickly I can get banned by THIS nitwit.”

Congratulations. This “nitwit” just banned you.

It’s really a shame it had to be this way. But you see I’m not really into letting people post here who insult me on other blogs behind my back. I’m sure you understand, as you have a blog of your own.

I see you have posted a copy of the message you posted here in this thread there at the AA blog to brag to other people there about what you wrote. I’m glad you did, because it wasn’t going to stay up here. You had no intentions of having a rational dialogue with me when you first came here and accordingly, I have no intentions of allowing you to stay here and post about how much you hate Christian conservatives, especially considering you think THIS Christian conservative is a “nitwit.”

You won’t be able to see this, but no doubt some of your pals at AA will see this and repost it for you to see at your own blog. And as is your right, you’ll no doubt slander me at the AA blog for “banning you for merely disagreeing with the blog hostess” when that isn’t the reason at all. The reason is you shouldn’t have disrespected me before you even got to know me. You deliberately came over here and started posting in order to antagonize me and belittle my beliefs. At least the other two people who came over from the AA blog gave me a chance to explain my position once they got here and we engaged in a civilized debate about the Sheehan issue. You, OTOH, didn’t and immediately went for talking down to me. That’s very junior-highish, and it won’t be tolerated here. So have fun dissing me all you want there. Because you (and your pals there) won’t be allowed to do it here. –ST

]]>