in the wrong era. Soundly refuting
liberals online since 2000.
| Free Beacon | 0 | |
| AP | 0 | |
| Power Line | 0 | |
| B’berg | 2012 Watch: Gingrich Seeks to Ease Fundraising Woes as Las Vegas Checks Slowing Down |
0 |
| The Hill | Scandal: Pelosi might have skirted House ethics rules on campaign solicitations |
0 |
Audacity of Truth
Gaffetastic:
Vice President Joe Biden had his “oops” moment Wednesday speaking in a 49er-crazed SF when he told a crowd at a city political fundraiser that “the Giants are on their way to the Super Bowl.” - SF Chronicle, 1-18-12
Media Can’t Let Go Of Vietnam Comparisons
Check this out:
Headline: Bush’s Words on Iraq Echo LBJ in 1967
WASHINGTON (AP) – Bush officials bristle at the suggestion the war in Iraq might look anything like Vietnam. Yet just as today’s anti-war protests recall memories of yesteryear, President Bush’s own words echo those of President Johnson in 1967, a pivotal year for the U.S. in Vietnam.
“America is committed to the defense of South Vietnam until an honorable peace can be negotiated,” Johnson told the Tennessee Legislature on March 15, 1967. Despite the obstacles to victory, the president said, “We shall stay the course.”
After 14 Marines died in a roadside bombing on Aug. 3, Bush declared: “We will stay the course, we will complete the job in Iraq. And the job is this: We’ll help the Iraqis develop a democracy.”
The two wars were waged quite differently even though they shared similar aims.
About 500,000 U.S. troops were in Vietnam in 1967 after a three-year buildup, compared with about 140,000 in Iraq today. Heavy aerial bombing was a primary U.S. strategy in Vietnam while Iraq, after the initial campaign of “shock and awe,” has been mainly a ground war. The U.S. negotiated for peace in Vietnam, but there is no single entity with which to negotiate in Iraq.
“The differences are so notable that it would take too long to list them,” Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld remarked recently.
Knowing the long, painful and divisive Vietnam War ended with an unceremonious U.S. withdrawal and the fall of South Vietnam, administration officials have blanched at comparisons with Iraq. The administration declined to comment on comparisons between the rhetoric of Johnson and Bush.
Johnson’s main arguments were much like those Bush has employed: War was justified to protect the U.S. and to encourage freedom everywhere. When faced with mounting losses on the battlefield, both presidents offered the dead as a reason to keep fighting.
*Insert Al Gore ‘sigh’ here*
Rush made a good point a couple of days ago in that that the media are stuck in the past and I want to expand on that some: the Vietnam war era was their heyday. It was where their anti-war stances were played out in articles that were supposed to be free from bias but weren’t and those articles played a significant role in the opinions of those here at home, which in turn contributed to our withdrawal, and also during that same time members of the media aided in bringing down a sitting President. I’m not saying Nixon’s coverup was ok, so please don’t get me wrong on that, but the fact of the matter is that the Vietnam era is when the media’s influence on public policy and pushing scandal coverage was huge and believe me, they relished it. I can’t tell you how many times in the past I’ve read interviews about reporters who wanted to get into the news media in order to “make a difference” – but that’s what activists are supposed to do, not reporters (unless you’re an opinion writer or investigative reporter). Ok, I know I’m digressing a bit, but you get the picture 
(Cross-posted at BlogsForBush)
RSS feed for comments on this post.
3 Responses to “Media Can’t Let Go Of Vietnam Comparisons”
Comments
Blogads
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of ST's advertisers, nor do their opinions necessarily reflect ST's. Island of Misfit Bloggers
Stats
Gen. Honore is more correct and right on than he thinks when he said, “You’re stuck on stupid, reporter!”
It is a common practice of the right wing, especially Rush Limbaugh, to blame the media when things go wrong, instead of the people responsible. The media was not responsible for the United States losing in Vietnam. The United States lost in Vietnam because the war was poorly planned and carried out by our leadership and things are going poorly in Iraq for the same reasons. The Bush Administration has made one mistake after another in planning and carrying out the war against Iraq.
It is not just the media who reported things were going badly in Vietnam. Col. David Hackworth, the most decorated American soldier ever, and also someone who spent a lot of time in Vietnam said in 1971 that Vietnam “is a bad war … it can’t be won. We need to get out.”. He also predicted Saigon would fall to North Vietnam within four years.
Col David Hackworth was also very critical of the way the war in Iraq was planned and carried out. Early in the war, him and other retired military leaders were saying that the administration did not send enough troops to quell Iraqi resistance. This is what he had to say about Donald Rumsfeld:
“He went in light, on the cheap, he has misunderstood the whole war, he should go … Rumsfeld is an arrogant a**hole. That’s a quote, by the way.”
Since the start of the war, President Bush and his administration have made one mistake after another. If the United States is unsuccessful in Iraq, it will be because of an incompetent president and his administration, not the media.
“It is a common practice of the right wing, especially Rush Limbaugh, to blame the media when things go wrong, instead of the people responsible.”
That’s not true. The media’s influence is usually cited as a significant contributing factor.