<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earle on film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/09/30/earle-on-film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/09/30/earle-on-film/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:59:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/09/30/earle-on-film/comment-page-1/#comment-34901</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 01:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/09/30/earle-on-film/#comment-34901</guid>
		<description>Clayton, 

Maybe so, but it just lends more credibility to the argument that Earle is a publicity hound, don&#039;t you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clayton, </p>
<p>Maybe so, but it just lends more credibility to the argument that Earle is a publicity hound, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clayton</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/09/30/earle-on-film/comment-page-1/#comment-34210</link>
		<dc:creator>clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/09/30/earle-on-film/#comment-34210</guid>
		<description>Just wondering if anyone has read Brian York&#039;s actual description of the film?

I just saw an AP story quoting the filmamkers for the first time. They claim they approached DeLay to do a film about the case through his eyes, but DeLay turned them down. 

Frankly, I can&#039;t see any difference between what these guys are doing and a hundred other docs on cable featuring DAs dealing with a high profile case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering if anyone has read Brian York&#8217;s actual description of the film?</p>
<p>I just saw an AP story quoting the filmamkers for the first time. They claim they approached DeLay to do a film about the case through his eyes, but DeLay turned them down. </p>
<p>Frankly, I can&#8217;t see any difference between what these guys are doing and a hundred other docs on cable featuring DAs dealing with a high profile case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/09/30/earle-on-film/comment-page-1/#comment-33593</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/09/30/earle-on-film/#comment-33593</guid>
		<description>Ron Earle is a white version of a Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton with a legal degree.  Nothing ethical or even handed about him.

Also, what about some indictments for the people in the Dcmocrat pac Earle spoke to about Earle going to get DeLay?  That pac operates in the same fashion as DeLay&#039;s pac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Earle is a white version of a Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton with a legal degree.  Nothing ethical or even handed about him.</p>
<p>Also, what about some indictments for the people in the Dcmocrat pac Earle spoke to about Earle going to get DeLay?  That pac operates in the same fashion as DeLay&#8217;s pac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

