<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gray Lady Down &#8211; a slam against the NYT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:52:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64255</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64255</guid>
		<description>&quot;andrew and steve reveal their deep seated hatred of Israel. What a pair of Bigots.&quot;

The funny thing is that steve is referencing an arab attack and me a jewish one. And yet this is bigotry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;andrew and steve reveal their deep seated hatred of Israel. What a pair of Bigots.&#8221;</p>
<p>The funny thing is that steve is referencing an arab attack and me a jewish one. And yet this is bigotry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64237</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64237</guid>
		<description>Dax wrote, &quot;&lt;em&gt;The main problem with Liberalism is their inability to objectively look at themselves, their policies, and the outcomes of their policies and realize where they are wrong.&lt;/em&gt;

I&#039;ll say there is an amount of lack of personal responsibility fueled by the inability for self-critique. That lack of personal responsibility is responsible for not matching up facts, policies, solutions with the results as in cause and effect type scenarios. 

With a lack of personal responsibility it &quot;feels&quot; good to liberals to &quot;feel&quot; that tax rates shouldn&#039;t have been reduced for the top 1% of income earners (the tax rate reduction was given to all income tax payers but liberal &quot;feelings&quot; can&#039;t take that information in.) What is important to them with this lack of responsibility is their &quot;feelings&quot;. They will not step up to the plate and be responsible to see if policies/solutions will result in their stated desires.

Steve is a prime example of this. He will not engage on the substance of our ideas. He will only &quot;feel&quot; and his lack of responsibility will only feed his problem until he grows some sense of responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dax wrote, &#8220;<em>The main problem with Liberalism is their inability to objectively look at themselves, their policies, and the outcomes of their policies and realize where they are wrong.</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say there is an amount of lack of personal responsibility fueled by the inability for self-critique. That lack of personal responsibility is responsible for not matching up facts, policies, solutions with the results as in cause and effect type scenarios. </p>
<p>With a lack of personal responsibility it &#8220;feels&#8221; good to liberals to &#8220;feel&#8221; that tax rates shouldn&#8217;t have been reduced for the top 1% of income earners (the tax rate reduction was given to all income tax payers but liberal &#8220;feelings&#8221; can&#8217;t take that information in.) What is important to them with this lack of responsibility is their &#8220;feelings&#8221;. They will not step up to the plate and be responsible to see if policies/solutions will result in their stated desires.</p>
<p>Steve is a prime example of this. He will not engage on the substance of our ideas. He will only &#8220;feel&#8221; and his lack of responsibility will only feed his problem until he grows some sense of responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dax</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64234</link>
		<dc:creator>Dax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64234</guid>
		<description>Dax, A second answer to your question. 

Lack of personal responsibility.

&lt;em&gt;Me, I think it&#039;s lack of honesty based on the realization that everything, or possibly everything, that are core foundations of their beliefs are fraudulent&lt;/em&gt;

1) Won&#039;t do the research to see if their leveled accusations have merit

&lt;em&gt;Again, a lack of honesty.&lt;/em&gt;

2) Won&#039;t do the research to see if their solutions/policies would have the results (that everyone wants - no racism, no deficits, good education, good environment, good economy)

&lt;em&gt;Again, honesty.&lt;/em&gt;

3) Will actually believe that the 50% of the country who is conservative (instead of being responsible and listening to a conservative&#039;s dream) do not want an a) a good environment, good education, no defecit, good economy, etc.)
4) Lack of personal responsibility in realizing that utopia CAN NOT exist. Life is as it is and we can only try to improve the circumstances for everyone. We can teach people how to fish or give them fish but is giving it to them really the solution? No.

&lt;em&gt;The main problem with Liberalism is their inability to objectively look at themselves, their policies, and the outcomes of their policies and realize where they are wrong.
You have to go no further than public education. Public education has been, and continues to be, a Liberal petridish. Every possible Liberal experiment has been tried, and where is public education today? I&#039;ve asked Liberals to address the problems with public education and the problems that first comes to their minds are: 
1. Higher wages for teachers.
2. Smaller classrooms.
3. More schools.
Can a person with an ounce of honesty say that THOSE ARE THE MAIN PROBLEMS WITH PUBLIC EDUCATION???
Again, the problem with Liberalism is the lack of honesty, and without honesty, you have.............................................nothing
Dax in Raleigh &lt;/em&gt;

Comment by Baklava @ 12/30/2005 - 10:26 am</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dax, A second answer to your question. </p>
<p>Lack of personal responsibility.</p>
<p><em>Me, I think it&#8217;s lack of honesty based on the realization that everything, or possibly everything, that are core foundations of their beliefs are fraudulent</em></p>
<p>1) Won&#8217;t do the research to see if their leveled accusations have merit</p>
<p><em>Again, a lack of honesty.</em></p>
<p>2) Won&#8217;t do the research to see if their solutions/policies would have the results (that everyone wants &#8211; no racism, no deficits, good education, good environment, good economy)</p>
<p><em>Again, honesty.</em></p>
<p>3) Will actually believe that the 50% of the country who is conservative (instead of being responsible and listening to a conservative&#8217;s dream) do not want an a) a good environment, good education, no defecit, good economy, etc.)<br />
4) Lack of personal responsibility in realizing that utopia CAN NOT exist. Life is as it is and we can only try to improve the circumstances for everyone. We can teach people how to fish or give them fish but is giving it to them really the solution? No.</p>
<p><em>The main problem with Liberalism is their inability to objectively look at themselves, their policies, and the outcomes of their policies and realize where they are wrong.<br />
You have to go no further than public education. Public education has been, and continues to be, a Liberal petridish. Every possible Liberal experiment has been tried, and where is public education today? I&#8217;ve asked Liberals to address the problems with public education and the problems that first comes to their minds are:<br />
1. Higher wages for teachers.<br />
2. Smaller classrooms.<br />
3. More schools.<br />
Can a person with an ounce of honesty say that THOSE ARE THE MAIN PROBLEMS WITH PUBLIC EDUCATION???<br />
Again, the problem with Liberalism is the lack of honesty, and without honesty, you have&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;nothing<br />
Dax in Raleigh </em></p>
<p>Comment by Baklava @ 12/30/2005 &#8211; 10:26 am</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Foster</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64073</link>
		<dc:creator>David Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64073</guid>
		<description>Tommy,

Specifically to your points on social security: I suspect that if FDR were around today, he would be open to new ideas about how to handle SS, including private accounts and investment of part of the money in equities. The present configuration of SS is only one of many ways to run a national pension system..it seems that many Democrats treat it as graven on stone because &#039;that&#039;s the way we&#039;ve always done things around here.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy,</p>
<p>Specifically to your points on social security: I suspect that if FDR were around today, he would be open to new ideas about how to handle SS, including private accounts and investment of part of the money in equities. The present configuration of SS is only one of many ways to run a national pension system..it seems that many Democrats treat it as graven on stone because &#8216;that&#8217;s the way we&#8217;ve always done things around here.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64065</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64065</guid>
		<description>PCD, 
&gt;:/
/tagging you as I have to shower and get to work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PCD,<br />
<img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_waving.gif' alt='&#62;&#58;&#47;' class='wp-smiley' width='23' height='17' title='&#62;&#58;&#47;' /><br />
/tagging you as I have to shower and get to work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64064</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64064</guid>
		<description>Tommy,
1) Has the support of more than 2/3rd of Americans
2) Has the support of more than 2/3rd of Americans
3) You assertion is incorrect.

The second part of the question was ignored. Why are these 2 things bad Tommy?

These are perfectly reasonable and yet you characterize it absurdly as &quot;restricting a woman&#039;s right to choose&quot;. Choose when? In the 9th month? Without the parents knowing? 

Reasonable and widely supported = bad :-?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy,<br />
1) Has the support of more than 2/3rd of Americans<br />
2) Has the support of more than 2/3rd of Americans<br />
3) You assertion is incorrect.</p>
<p>The second part of the question was ignored. Why are these 2 things bad Tommy?</p>
<p>These are perfectly reasonable and yet you characterize it absurdly as &#8220;restricting a woman&#8217;s right to choose&#8221;. Choose when? In the 9th month? Without the parents knowing? </p>
<p>Reasonable and widely supported = bad <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_think.gif' alt='&#58;&#45;&#63;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#45;&#63;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64063</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64063</guid>
		<description>tommy,

You are a barbarian!

1. partial birth abortion is an abomination where a viable child is killed.  You ever hear of adoption??

2. Since parents are responsible for the child&#039;s welfare, then they should be notified about anything and everything that happens to that child.  What kind of person are you????

3.The UN does not operate in the US.  So why should we fund it at all???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tommy,</p>
<p>You are a barbarian!</p>
<p>1. partial birth abortion is an abomination where a viable child is killed.  You ever hear of adoption??</p>
<p>2. Since parents are responsible for the child&#8217;s welfare, then they should be notified about anything and everything that happens to that child.  What kind of person are you????</p>
<p>3.The UN does not operate in the US.  So why should we fund it at all???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64062</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64062</guid>
		<description>Tommy lied again by writing, &quot;&lt;em&gt;It all comes back to the tax cuts for the wealthiest 1% of Americans would be able to finance more of these gov&#039;t programs that&#039;s all. &lt;/em&gt;

It was a tax cut for all income tax payers and guess what... the government revenues are increasing by the double-digits. We could&#039;ve raised tax rates and the revenues into the government be less because the recession was extended. WHich would you have wanted Tommy? Extended recession means more people suffering longer...

There is diputing your lie. 

On Social Security... allowing people to manage 6% of their contributions in mutual funds gives them a nest egg they can pass down to their children (something that currently african american/black men can&#039;t do and they die sooner). THe government would honor ALL of what seniors are owed and your accusation that the government wouldn&#039;t is NOT what Bush&#039;s plan posted on the whitehouse&#039;s website says. All you have is accusations and no debate of ideas. 

Nobody wants the elderly to &quot;fend&quot; for themselves as you seem to &quot;think&quot; conservatives want. Isn&#039;t it interesting how you believe such poor thoughts about the wants of 50% of americans. Grow up. We all want people to live better as I stated above. Unfortunately liberals can&#039;t recognize this and debate so poorly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy lied again by writing, &#8220;<em>It all comes back to the tax cuts for the wealthiest 1% of Americans would be able to finance more of these gov&#8217;t programs that&#8217;s all. </em></p>
<p>It was a tax cut for all income tax payers and guess what&#8230; the government revenues are increasing by the double-digits. We could&#8217;ve raised tax rates and the revenues into the government be less because the recession was extended. WHich would you have wanted Tommy? Extended recession means more people suffering longer&#8230;</p>
<p>There is diputing your lie. </p>
<p>On Social Security&#8230; allowing people to manage 6% of their contributions in mutual funds gives them a nest egg they can pass down to their children (something that currently african american/black men can&#8217;t do and they die sooner). THe government would honor ALL of what seniors are owed and your accusation that the government wouldn&#8217;t is NOT what Bush&#8217;s plan posted on the whitehouse&#8217;s website says. All you have is accusations and no debate of ideas. </p>
<p>Nobody wants the elderly to &#8220;fend&#8221; for themselves as you seem to &#8220;think&#8221; conservatives want. Isn&#8217;t it interesting how you believe such poor thoughts about the wants of 50% of americans. Grow up. We all want people to live better as I stated above. Unfortunately liberals can&#8217;t recognize this and debate so poorly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64061</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64061</guid>
		<description>Tommy,

You spew talking points again.  No reasoning or logic from you, nothing but spew.  You snow no figures or studies.  You just repeat the mantra of the left of &quot;Soak the Rich&quot;, the rich has no right to their riches.  

&lt;em&gt;Edited.  --ST&lt;/em&gt;.  I suppose you endorse this racial discrimination, too.  http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=1449254

As for your church and state mantra read and address this ruling http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051221/NEWS01/512210 407

Surprise us tommy and show us you can think, reason, and relate without talking points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy,</p>
<p>You spew talking points again.  No reasoning or logic from you, nothing but spew.  You snow no figures or studies.  You just repeat the mantra of the left of &#8220;Soak the Rich&#8221;, the rich has no right to their riches.  </p>
<p><em>Edited.  &#8211;ST</em>.  I suppose you endorse this racial discrimination, too.  <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=1449254" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=1449254</a></p>
<p>As for your church and state mantra read and address this ruling <a href="http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051221/NEWS01/512210" rel="nofollow">http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051221/NEWS01/512210</a> 407</p>
<p>Surprise us tommy and show us you can think, reason, and relate without talking points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy in nyc</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64060</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy in nyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64060</guid>
		<description>1)The partial-birth abortion bill 2) Republican dominated state legislatures passing bills requiring parental notifacation laws 3) denying cash to U.N. Programs unless that only teach abstinance programs as the only way to prevent the spread of STD&#039;S. are those 3 good enough for you Baklava.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1)The partial-birth abortion bill 2) Republican dominated state legislatures passing bills requiring parental notifacation laws 3) denying cash to U.N. Programs unless that only teach abstinance programs as the only way to prevent the spread of STD&#8217;S. are those 3 good enough for you Baklava.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64059</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64059</guid>
		<description>Dax, A second answer to your question. 

Lack of personal responsibility. 
1) Won&#039;t do the research to see if their leveled accusations have merit
2) Won&#039;t do the research to see if their solutions/policies would have the results (that everyone wants - no racism, no deficits, good education, good environment,  good economy)
3) Will actually believe that the 50% of the country who is conservative (instead of being responsible and listening to a conservative&#039;s dream) do not want an a) a good environment, good education, no defecit, good economy, etc.)
4) Lack of personal responsibility in realizing that utopia CAN NOT exist. Life is as it is and we can only try to improve the circumstances for everyone. We can teach people how to fish or give them fish but is giving it to them really the solution? No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dax, A second answer to your question. </p>
<p>Lack of personal responsibility.<br />
1) Won&#8217;t do the research to see if their leveled accusations have merit<br />
2) Won&#8217;t do the research to see if their solutions/policies would have the results (that everyone wants &#8211; no racism, no deficits, good education, good environment,  good economy)<br />
3) Will actually believe that the 50% of the country who is conservative (instead of being responsible and listening to a conservative&#8217;s dream) do not want an a) a good environment, good education, no defecit, good economy, etc.)<br />
4) Lack of personal responsibility in realizing that utopia CAN NOT exist. Life is as it is and we can only try to improve the circumstances for everyone. We can teach people how to fish or give them fish but is giving it to them really the solution? No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy in nyc</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64058</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy in nyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64058</guid>
		<description>It all comes back to the tax cuts for the wealthiest 1% of Americans would be able to finance more of these gov&#039;t programs that&#039;s all. There is no disputing this fact. By the way are also trying to tell me that taking money out of the Social Security fund as 43 would like to do won&#039;t decrease the amount of cash our senior citizens receive. While it is true that that social program is being used in ways in was never intentioned do you want the sick,infirm and elderly to be stuck to fend for themselves? To say nothing about how the right fightstooth and nail against legalizing grass while drug companies are making money hand over fist? The constituation also never mentions anything about federal spending being used to finance religious education of which I am a product of. Long live secularism the only hope for the future of this great nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all comes back to the tax cuts for the wealthiest 1% of Americans would be able to finance more of these gov&#8217;t programs that&#8217;s all. There is no disputing this fact. By the way are also trying to tell me that taking money out of the Social Security fund as 43 would like to do won&#8217;t decrease the amount of cash our senior citizens receive. While it is true that that social program is being used in ways in was never intentioned do you want the sick,infirm and elderly to be stuck to fend for themselves? To say nothing about how the right fightstooth and nail against legalizing grass while drug companies are making money hand over fist? The constituation also never mentions anything about federal spending being used to finance religious education of which I am a product of. Long live secularism the only hope for the future of this great nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dax</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64057</link>
		<dc:creator>Dax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64057</guid>
		<description>And if you weren&#039;t pi$$ed-off enough, try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mrc.org/notablequotables/bestof/2005/best1-4.asp#1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;

Media bias? No way! /:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you weren&#8217;t pi$$ed-off enough, try <a href="http://www.mrc.org/notablequotables/bestof/2005/best1-4.asp#1" rel="nofollow">this</a></p>
<p>Media bias? No way! <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_eyebrow.gif' alt='&#47;&#58;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#47;&#58;&#41;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64056</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64056</guid>
		<description>Tommy wrote, &quot;&lt;em&gt;more and more restrictions on a woman&#039;s right to choose&lt;/em&gt;

Another laundry list. We&#039;se on the right (little tommy lingo for ya) keep having to deal with inaccurate accusation from Tommy. But here goes. Tommy, I asked you on some other thread and you ignored the question. Name three things that the Republicans in Congress have done since gaining power in 1994 to restrict a woman&#039;s right to choose and why that action was bad in your view. Remember, we are here to correct your incorrect assertions.

When you throw out laundry lists Tommy. We can&#039;t adequately deal with the rest of your list without having a book written. But your penchant to hoist blame on conservatives/Republicans for things you aren&#039;t knowledgable enough to talk about has gotten you into a situation where you can only FIRE AWAY. Spray and pray is what you are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy wrote, &#8220;<em>more and more restrictions on a woman&#8217;s right to choose</em></p>
<p>Another laundry list. We&#8217;se on the right (little tommy lingo for ya) keep having to deal with inaccurate accusation from Tommy. But here goes. Tommy, I asked you on some other thread and you ignored the question. Name three things that the Republicans in Congress have done since gaining power in 1994 to restrict a woman&#8217;s right to choose and why that action was bad in your view. Remember, we are here to correct your incorrect assertions.</p>
<p>When you throw out laundry lists Tommy. We can&#8217;t adequately deal with the rest of your list without having a book written. But your penchant to hoist blame on conservatives/Republicans for things you aren&#8217;t knowledgable enough to talk about has gotten you into a situation where you can only FIRE AWAY. Spray and pray is what you are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/comment-page-1/#comment-64055</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/12/29/gray-lady-down-a-slam-against-the-nyt/#comment-64055</guid>
		<description>tommy, you are projecting your own psychological shortcomings on to others, specifically myself and others who disagree with you.

You&#039;ve spouted nothing more than the talking points of the DNC, Daily Krap, DU, and ScamAmerica.  You care to show us how you think?

Here&#039;s one to start with.  Other than Defense, name a federal program the Democrats have said that Bush is not running right and what is the solution.  Bonus points for telling us how spending more in the budget than is beins spent now will not balloon the deficit further.

Just a preemptive strike on you, tommy.  There isn&#039;t one program, other than Defense, where the Democrats would not hike spending far more than the GOP is spending now.

Over at the Right Politics blog, there is a citation of an excellent article concerning the myth of separation of church and state.  Except for Congress being barred from establishing a state religion, the Constitution is silent except for the Bill of Rights which allows freedom or religious expression.  Show us your thoughts on this tommy, and don&#039;t think you can pass off canned talking points as your thoughts because we&#039;ve seen them thousands of times before posted by wandering liberal trolls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tommy, you are projecting your own psychological shortcomings on to others, specifically myself and others who disagree with you.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve spouted nothing more than the talking points of the DNC, Daily Krap, DU, and ScamAmerica.  You care to show us how you think?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one to start with.  Other than Defense, name a federal program the Democrats have said that Bush is not running right and what is the solution.  Bonus points for telling us how spending more in the budget than is beins spent now will not balloon the deficit further.</p>
<p>Just a preemptive strike on you, tommy.  There isn&#8217;t one program, other than Defense, where the Democrats would not hike spending far more than the GOP is spending now.</p>
<p>Over at the Right Politics blog, there is a citation of an excellent article concerning the myth of separation of church and state.  Except for Congress being barred from establishing a state religion, the Constitution is silent except for the Bill of Rights which allows freedom or religious expression.  Show us your thoughts on this tommy, and don&#8217;t think you can pass off canned talking points as your thoughts because we&#8217;ve seen them thousands of times before posted by wandering liberal trolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

