Comments on: The final Barrett report http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/ Don't dis or dismiss this miss! Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:31:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Lorica http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/comment-page-1/#comment-71869 Lorica Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:09:49 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/#comment-71869 LOL That is true of Harkin PCD, No Doubt!! I will disagree with you about Grassley. Grassley released the BRAC list before it was made public, so it is not like he has not don't this before. We shall see. It could be a pipe dream, but I do expect someone to release those pages to the public. - Lorica LOL That is true of Harkin PCD, No Doubt!!
I will disagree with you about Grassley. Grassley released the BRAC list before it was made public, so it is not like he has not don’t this before. We shall see. It could be a pipe dream, but I do expect someone to release those pages to the public. – Lorica

]]> By: PCD http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/comment-page-1/#comment-71823 PCD Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:58:00 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/#comment-71823 Grassley won't leak or disclose the redacted pages. Chuck has too much integrity and class to do that. If the roles and this was a Republican Administration, Tom Harkin would be delivering copies of the redacted pages door to door. Grassley won’t leak or disclose the redacted pages. Chuck has too much integrity and class to do that.

If the roles and this was a Republican Administration, Tom Harkin would be delivering copies of the redacted pages door to door.

]]> By: Lorica http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/comment-page-1/#comment-71411 Lorica Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:19:19 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/#comment-71411 It wouldn't hurt national security Bak. It would hurt only the previous administration. This judge not wanting to see his buddy Billy Bob get lambasted by truth redacted those pages. Since the IRS or HUD don't deal in national secrets, I don't see how it is possible that national security is going to be bothered. We shall see what happens, but I am believing that some aide to some Senator is going to release these pages. - Lorica It wouldn’t hurt national security Bak. It would hurt only the previous administration. This judge not wanting to see his buddy Billy Bob get lambasted by truth redacted those pages. Since the IRS or HUD don’t deal in national secrets, I don’t see how it is possible that national security is going to be bothered. We shall see what happens, but I am believing that some aide to some Senator is going to release these pages. – Lorica

]]> By: Baklava http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/comment-page-1/#comment-71362 Baklava Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:27:46 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/#comment-71362 How would it hurt national security? How would it hurt national security?

]]> By: Lorica http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/comment-page-1/#comment-71249 Lorica Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:37:41 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/#comment-71249 I heard someone on the radio talking about the redacted pages. They said that Grassley or some other senator that has access to the pages should "leak" them out to the public. What would that judge do??? He cannot hold a senator of the United States in contempt while he is the process of doing his job. =)) Should be fun to see how fast these are leaked to us. - Lorica I heard someone on the radio talking about the redacted pages. They said that Grassley or some other senator that has access to the pages should “leak” them out to the public. What would that judge do??? He cannot hold a senator of the United States in contempt while he is the process of doing his job. =)) Should be fun to see how fast these are leaked to us. – Lorica

]]> By: ttyler5 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/comment-page-1/#comment-71068 ttyler5 Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:58:17 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/#comment-71068 Clinton and Cisneros were a pair, alright. Clinton and Cisneros were a pair, alright.

]]> By: Francis W. Porretto http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/comment-page-1/#comment-71055 Francis W. Porretto Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:41:35 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/01/20/the-final-barrett-report/#comment-71055 I will be keenly watching the Old Media coverage of this report. It would appear to confirm the worst of the allegations made against the Clinton White House, which the Old Media were determined to protect right to the end. None of Clinton's misdeeds ever struck the Old Media Commentariat as worthy of a close look, much less criticism or condemnation. The Bush Administration doesn't have a single ethical or moral black mark against it. Its personnel, from the top down, have exhibited gentlemanly behavior even in the face of the most scurrilous unfounded attacks. Yet the Old Media lambaste it relentlessly. <b><i>What's wrong with this picture?</i></b> I will be keenly watching the Old Media coverage of this report. It would appear to confirm the worst of the allegations made against the Clinton White House, which the Old Media were determined to protect right to the end. None of Clinton’s misdeeds ever struck the Old Media Commentariat as worthy of a close look, much less criticism or condemnation.

The Bush Administration doesn’t have a single ethical or moral black mark against it. Its personnel, from the top down, have exhibited gentlemanly behavior even in the face of the most scurrilous unfounded attacks. Yet the Old Media lambaste it relentlessly. What’s wrong with this picture?

]]>