If abortion is no longer an option for men to even coerce women into doing with a child said man doesn’t want to pay for, then what?

Seems an awful careless and foolish thing to say in my opinion.

By the way, Tennessee is considering something similiar.

If abortion is no longer an option for men to even coerce women into doing with a child said man doesn’t want to pay for, then what? Or is this just a pre-emptive way of making sure that supporting accidental offspring is solely the woman’s responsibility in the new illegal abortion era?

There are 3 ways to get something done:

1.) Do it yourself.
2.) Hire someone else to do it.
3.) Tell your kids not to do it.

you may believe in instructing your children about sex only at home, but not every parent is willing to do so. quite the contrary in many cases. what happens to those kids? the ones who have to figure it out themselves? i’d say chances are that many will make poor decisions in the heat of the moment. and please don’t think i don’t advocate sex ed at home, because i do.

if you are promoting “personal responsiblity” it is much easier to take responsiblity for your actions if you know what options are, and what the consequences will be if you choose certain options. i think knowledge is a better deterrent than being told not to do something “because it’s bad,” and unfortunately, that’s the information many kids get in their own homes.

And I wonder where this idea of it not really being sex and not a big thing (no pun intended) could have come from?

The morality of our country continues to decline thanks in part to many liberal legislations and court rulings such as Roe v. Wade.

Should say reduce the risk of pregnancies also, since this is not foolproof either.

To those that say that who thinks of such things when in the heat of the moment…well stupidity while trying to drop your fly is not an excuse.

Plain and simple, you have sex, you run the risk of getting someone pregnant, whether you use ‘protection’ or not.

Protection is not foolproof, it just lessens the chance of something happening, like pregnancy or getting an STD.

Lets flip this on its head so to speak.
Would you use a condom or ‘protection’ to have sex with a known HIV or Aids infected person?

I wouldn’t.
Do you so trust your protection to keep you that safe?

If you don’t find it safe enough for having sex with something that could infect and kill you, why do you not take the same precautions when you could cause pregnancies?

Most discussion, except for a few legitamate cases, will be in a language that I do not understand – Excusitis, where the more excuses one makes for their actions, the longer their nose will get.

I never had sex in high school because I was too young and didn’t want babies. It’s that damn simple.Control.

For the dummies that think the world owes them a living and everything is free, try to focus on this one point first chance you get, you’re on the third rock from the sun. Utopia is out a bit further.

What Lynda neglected to add is that condoms are not involved in this. They are cheap and over the counter. They not only can prevent pregnancy, but also reduce the risk of STD’s!