Comments on: Former WaPo exec. editor Ben Bradlee: Woodward’s source may be Armitage http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/ Don't dis or dismiss this miss! Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:25:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Big Bang Hunter http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-91058 Big Bang Hunter Wed, 15 Mar 2006 03:31:01 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-91058 - Sometimes its simply unbelievable, watching the leaders on the left. they want back in power, scramble and lie and try every ploy they can think of to regain power. They want to lead but they act like a bunch of sour grapes losers and petulant children that lost their lollipop. Amazing. Who do they imagine will back them for positions of leadership when thats the manner they comport themselves in when in a tough situation. It sends a very strong message they'd do exactly the same thing when faced with the dangers of the WOT, or any other crisus America had to deal with. We saw what the excellance of Democratic leadership can do in Katrina. Thanks, but no thanks. - Bang **== - Sometimes its simply unbelievable, watching the leaders on the left. they want back in power, scramble and lie and try every ploy they can think of to regain power. They want to lead but they act like a bunch of sour grapes losers and petulant children that lost their lollipop. Amazing. Who do they imagine will back them for positions of leadership when thats the manner they comport themselves in when in a tough situation. It sends a very strong message they’d do exactly the same thing when faced with the dangers of the WOT, or any other crisus America had to deal with. We saw what the excellance of Democratic leadership can do in Katrina. Thanks, but no thanks.

- Bang **==

]]> By: sanity http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90982 sanity Wed, 15 Mar 2006 03:04:21 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90982 Bang that is how dhimmicrats debate, here is proof from Senator Russ Feingold (D – Wisconsin) 30 minute whine about his resolution to censure President Bush, he immediately left the floor and denied debate to Senator Arlen Specter (R – PA). <blockquote> SPECTER: Mr. President, well I think this subject matter is worthy of debate, but not withstanding my experience at debating, I don't think I could debate without someone to debate with. So I tried to attract the attention of the Senator from Wisconsin before he departed the chamber. I think you got him right as he was on the way out the door, but let me ask his staffers if they would like to invite the Senator from Wisconsin to return to the floor with my having listened to his long soliloquy, if I might have the benefit of his presence so that we can deal with these issues in some substantive detail. </blockquote> <a href="http://exposetheleft.com/2006/03/14/specterfeingold/" rel="nofollow">from Expose the Left</a> Debate? What debate? He makes his statements, and refuses debate and walks out of the room. Is this is such an important issue why not stick around, DEBATE, talk about it, get it out in the open. Same as here, don't spout off and not have any proof, because you will be called on it. Bang that is how dhimmicrats debate, here is proof from Senator Russ Feingold (D – Wisconsin) 30 minute whine about his resolution to censure President Bush, he immediately left the floor and denied debate to Senator Arlen Specter (R – PA).

SPECTER: Mr. President, well I think this subject matter is worthy of debate, but not withstanding my experience at debating, I don’t think I could debate without someone to debate with. So I tried to attract the attention of the Senator from Wisconsin before he departed the chamber. I think you got him right as he was on the way out the door, but let me ask his staffers if they would like to invite the Senator from Wisconsin to return to the floor with my having listened to his long soliloquy, if I might have the benefit of his presence so that we can deal with these issues in some substantive detail.

from Expose the Left

Debate? What debate?

He makes his statements, and refuses debate and walks out of the room.

Is this is such an important issue why not stick around, DEBATE, talk about it, get it out in the open.

Same as here, don’t spout off and not have any proof, because you will be called on it.

]]> By: Big Bang Hunter http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90957 Big Bang Hunter Wed, 15 Mar 2006 02:45:53 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90957 - Continuing the thread.... Back when this whole kerfluffle started I asked two simple questions, wondering if anyone on the left was honest enough to just come out with a straight answer(s). The first was why the "leakers" just had to go to8 a known Liberal rag with the information, instead of any number of Democratic Senators on the hill, or for that matter the lawfull way, using the "whistle blowers" process they knew intimately and had a greed too. Nada. Never got an answer, other than one guy who said, "What, and have the whole scandal buried"... which led natuarlly to my second qiestion. "Is your side so cynical, paranoid, and basically unstable that you don't even trust your own Congressman?" - Again I never got an straight answer. But I guess thats what you do when you've lost everything in sight and all you have left is disembling, evasions, or personal attacks like we just witnessed. - Bang **== - Continuing the thread…. Back when this whole kerfluffle started I asked two simple questions, wondering if anyone on the left was honest enough to just come out with a straight answer(s). The first was why the “leakers” just had to go to8 a known Liberal rag with the information, instead of any number of Democratic Senators on the hill, or for that matter the lawfull way, using the “whistle blowers” process they knew intimately and had a greed too.

Nada. Never got an answer, other than one guy who said, “What, and have the whole scandal buried”… which led natuarlly to my second qiestion.

“Is your side so cynical, paranoid, and basically unstable that you don’t even trust your own Congressman?”

- Again I never got an straight answer. But I guess thats what you do when you’ve lost everything in sight and all you have left is disembling, evasions, or personal attacks like we just witnessed.

- Bang **==

]]> By: Sister Toldjah http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90954 Sister Toldjah Wed, 15 Mar 2006 02:18:23 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90954 jac, Bang was on topic. Please stop making the posters here the topic matter, rather than the actual topic being discussed. I left your insult to Bang up only because he'd responded to it in kind before I got saw it. jac, Bang was on topic. Please stop making the posters here the topic matter, rather than the actual topic being discussed. I left your insult to Bang up only because he’d responded to it in kind before I got saw it.

]]> By: Big Bang Hunter http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90952 Big Bang Hunter Wed, 15 Mar 2006 02:15:48 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90952 Ohhhh .... Leetle Stevie needs a protector....Except he sent a boy to do a mans job. Guess you need reminding to "jac"....The subject is how you sacrifice your own people by instigating them into breaking the law. "Leakers". - But your attention span doesn't appear to be any better than your chum Steve. The typical adhominem refuge of the Liberal with a battleship mouth, and a rowboat ass. Bring it on Sparky.... - Bang Ohhhh …. Leetle Stevie needs a protector….Except he sent a boy to do a mans job. Guess you need reminding to “jac”….The subject is how you sacrifice your own people by instigating them into breaking the law. “Leakers”.

- But your attention span doesn’t appear to be any better than your chum Steve. The typical adhominem refuge of the Liberal with a battleship mouth, and a rowboat ass. Bring it on Sparky….

- Bang

]]> By: jac http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90948 jac Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:58:12 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90948 Is that what you call a response Bang? Using pejorative terms? (look it up,dipshit). Why can't you stay on focus? And yes, this is what I call a response to your light in the loafers changing of the subject. Is that what you call a response Bang? Using pejorative terms? (look it up,dipshit). Why can’t you stay on focus?

And yes, this is what I call a response to your light in the loafers changing of the subject.

]]> By: Big Bang Hunter http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90940 Big Bang Hunter Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:48:48 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90940 Is that what you call a response Steve-oh... Focus. The subject was "leakers" and your limp wristed attempts to defend the indefensible. Remember now.... - See....its easy.... even for you.... - Bang **== Is that what you call a response Steve-oh… Focus. The subject was “leakers” and your limp wristed attempts to defend the indefensible. Remember now….

- See….its easy…. even for you….

- Bang **==

]]> By: steve http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90925 steve Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:28:04 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90925 "get bush", you mean like get Clinton and get Kerry and get so many others? "You live by the sword, you die by the sword"...that means everybody who uses violence, even bush. "mad rush to get bush", bush got himself by being arrogant and stupid. Peace “get bush”, you mean like get Clinton and get Kerry and get so many others? “You live by the sword, you die by the sword”…that means everybody who uses violence, even bush. “mad rush to get bush”, bush got himself by being arrogant and stupid. Peace

]]> By: Big Bang Hunter http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90907 Big Bang Hunter Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:13:03 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90907 - Nice way to circumvent the laws Steve-oh, trying to "protect" your "get Bush" leakers, lawbreakers that knew exactly what they were doing when they deliberately sidestepped the very lawful way they are given to take steps to expose "wrong-doing" when they think its needed. Every gov. employee signs a pledge not to do exactly that, break the law. Theres a perfectly legal means provided for them, with full job protection covering them in every way. - Sooooo. when people choose to go outside the law its obvious they have some ideolog driven agenda. Theres no other excuse, including your weak attemps to cover their butts, and try to explain away what they've done. - Might be nice if the hard left gave a damn about the peoples lives they ruin in their mad rush to "get Bush". But from the nature of everything else they do, it would be asking way too much for a moonbat to show that sort of compassion. "THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS!!! (no matter who it hurts) - Characterless losers. Period! - Bang's Fangs >:) - Nice way to circumvent the laws Steve-oh, trying to “protect” your “get Bush” leakers, lawbreakers that knew exactly what they were doing when they deliberately sidestepped the very lawful way they are given to take steps to expose “wrong-doing” when they think its needed. Every gov. employee signs a pledge not to do exactly that, break the law. Theres a perfectly legal means provided for them, with full job protection covering them in every way.

- Sooooo. when people choose to go outside the law its obvious they have some ideolog driven agenda. Theres no other excuse, including your weak attemps to cover their butts, and try to explain away what they’ve done.

- Might be nice if the hard left gave a damn about the peoples lives they ruin in their mad rush to “get Bush”. But from the nature of everything else they do, it would be asking way too much for a moonbat to show that sort of compassion. “THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS!!! (no matter who it hurts)

- Characterless losers. Period!

- Bang’s Fangs >:)

]]> By: steve http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90890 steve Tue, 14 Mar 2006 20:46:31 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90890 A "leaker" can be seen by their sludge trail. If the information you provide is meant to be destructive of legal activity, it is a "leak" and the person providing it is a "leaker". If the information provided helps to uncover wrong doing or illegal activity it is "whistleblowing", and the provider is a "whistlebloeer". The Plame "leak" was done to discredit Wilson. The NSA "whistleblower" was pointing out illegal activity being conducted by the bush administration. Peace A “leaker” can be seen by their sludge trail. If the information you provide is meant to be destructive of legal activity, it is a “leak” and the person providing it is a “leaker”. If the information provided helps to uncover wrong doing or illegal activity it is “whistleblowing”, and the provider is a “whistlebloeer”. The Plame “leak” was done to discredit Wilson. The NSA “whistleblower” was pointing out illegal activity being conducted by the bush administration. Peace

]]> By: CZ http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90853 CZ Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:49:36 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90853 Excellent question ST! l-) You must know by now that a leaker is a conservative and a whistleblower is a liberal. Did you ever wonder why liberals stand by their convictions but conservatives are considered close-minded? And why do conservatives conduct witch-hunts while liberals investigate official misconduct? Did you ever wonder why liberals seek support from the religious "community" but conservatives impose their religion on others? Isn't it odd that liberals enact laws for the good of the people and then accuse conservatives of imposing their morality on others? Excellent question ST! l-)

You must know by now that a leaker is a conservative and a whistleblower is a liberal.

Did you ever wonder why liberals stand by their convictions but conservatives are considered close-minded?

And why do conservatives conduct witch-hunts while liberals investigate official misconduct?

Did you ever wonder why liberals seek support from the religious “community” but conservatives impose their religion on others?

Isn’t it odd that liberals enact laws for the good of the people and then accuse conservatives of imposing their morality on others?

]]> By: Karl http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90851 Karl Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:22:38 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90851 hehe. No, that would require parity. What are you thinking? hehe. No, that would require parity. What are you thinking?

]]> By: Sister Toldjah http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90850 Sister Toldjah Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:19:09 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90850 While we're at it, I'd also like to get their definition between a leaker and a whistleblower :-\ While we’re at it, I’d also like to get their definition between a leaker and a whistleblower :-\

]]> By: Mwalimu Daudi http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90849 Mwalimu Daudi Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:04:00 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90849 I just want Democrats and the MSM to decide - are leaks good or bad? Could it be that those who wear the Scarlet "R" are automatically guilty of a crime-to-be-named-after-indictment-trial-and-public-hanging?:-? I just want Democrats and the MSM to decide – are leaks good or bad? Could it be that those who wear the Scarlet “R” are automatically guilty of a crime-to-be-named-after-indictment-trial-and-public-hanging?:-?

]]> By: Pros and Cons » So, is it Armitage? http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/comment-page-1/#comment-90845 Pros and Cons » So, is it Armitage? Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:31:12 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/14/wapo-exec-editor-ben-bradlee-woodwards-source-may-be-armitage/#comment-90845 [...] Sister Toldja takes the same line as Brit hume did last night on Fox. So much for the ravers out there talking about a plot to discredit noted tea drinking celebrity Joseph Wilson, husband of one of the least come. [...] [...] Sister Toldja takes the same line as Brit hume did last night on Fox. So much for the ravers out there talking about a plot to discredit noted tea drinking celebrity Joseph Wilson, husband of one of the least come. [...]

]]>