<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Francis Fukuyama vs. Charles Krauthammer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:25:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanity</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/comment-page-1/#comment-98555</link>
		<dc:creator>sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/#comment-98555</guid>
		<description>&quot;And then I will declare to them, &#039;I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And then I will declare to them, &#8216;I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/comment-page-1/#comment-98520</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/#comment-98520</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a religious anarchist so I could&#039;t tell you. Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a religious anarchist so I could&#8217;t tell you. Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/comment-page-1/#comment-98417</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/#comment-98417</guid>
		<description>Which book should we read for Democrat insight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which book should we read for Democrat insight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/comment-page-1/#comment-98414</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/#comment-98414</guid>
		<description>The sad part is that you Republicans have no idea who is actually running your party. The people in charge are using you to enrich themselves and care less if you die in Iraq or by breathing poisoned air or drinking polluted water.Read John W. Dean&#039;s book &quot;Worse than Watergate&quot;, for some Republican insight. Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad part is that you Republicans have no idea who is actually running your party. The people in charge are using you to enrich themselves and care less if you die in Iraq or by breathing poisoned air or drinking polluted water.Read John W. Dean&#8217;s book &#8220;Worse than Watergate&#8221;, for some Republican insight. Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/comment-page-1/#comment-98265</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/#comment-98265</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see a single fact mentioned Steve.  All I see is a bunch of your gibberish BS that I only read when I need a good laugh.  Care to back up a point with a link or two then I might respond to your &quot;Facts&quot;. But until you care to back up your BS, I don&#039;t really care what you have to say.  Ohhh and no it is not for me to prove your case, that is your job. - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see a single fact mentioned Steve.  All I see is a bunch of your gibberish BS that I only read when I need a good laugh.  Care to back up a point with a link or two then I might respond to your &#8220;Facts&#8221;. But until you care to back up your BS, I don&#8217;t really care what you have to say.  Ohhh and no it is not for me to prove your case, that is your job. &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/comment-page-1/#comment-98258</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/#comment-98258</guid>
		<description>You had nothing to respond to Steve. Same ole same ole</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You had nothing to respond to Steve. Same ole same ole</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanity</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/comment-page-1/#comment-98253</link>
		<dc:creator>sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/#comment-98253</guid>
		<description>steve were you talking about republicans or democrats?

While it seems some republicans are that way I see a MAJORITY of democrats are too.

SOmehting about stones and glass houses fit here I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steve were you talking about republicans or democrats?</p>
<p>While it seems some republicans are that way I see a MAJORITY of democrats are too.</p>
<p>SOmehting about stones and glass houses fit here I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/comment-page-1/#comment-98249</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/#comment-98249</guid>
		<description>Dead silence in the face of irrefutable fact.  Just like Republicans, their mouth can&#039;t move except to slime or lie. Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dead silence in the face of irrefutable fact.  Just like Republicans, their mouth can&#8217;t move except to slime or lie. Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/comment-page-1/#comment-97817</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/#comment-97817</guid>
		<description>Fukuyama, was one of the 18 signators to the New American Century letter sent to Clinton, in 1998. As were Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Khalilzad, Bolton and Perle among others. This group of neo-cons(Vulcans) have a simple belief system which includes the writings of Leo Strauss, the idea that the ends justifies the means and that lying is necessary. They also believe in a strong central government, limiting public knowledge about policy and pre-emptive and permanent war. Their thinking is in the process of being dis-credited which is why the rats are jumping ship. Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fukuyama, was one of the 18 signators to the New American Century letter sent to Clinton, in 1998. As were Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Khalilzad, Bolton and Perle among others. This group of neo-cons(Vulcans) have a simple belief system which includes the writings of Leo Strauss, the idea that the ends justifies the means and that lying is necessary. They also believe in a strong central government, limiting public knowledge about policy and pre-emptive and permanent war. Their thinking is in the process of being dis-credited which is why the rats are jumping ship. Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/comment-page-1/#comment-97783</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/03/28/francis-fukuyama-vs-charles-krauthammer/#comment-97783</guid>
		<description>On that topic of unforgivable. This is yet another example of liberals with their irresponsible rhetoric. It has happened far too often and they may be gaining traction in the political landscape but I hope they aren&#039;t gaining traction. In surveys twice as many people identify themselves as conservatives rather than liberal but sometimes that means little. When asked who people identify with more, because of demagoguing liberals have made Republican a bad name when Republicans are far from conservative.

So how will the elections turn out in November? Only God knows but one thing is certain. If Republicans keep actually tackling issues that conservatives care about such as illegal immigration and curbing spending politicians and the media may be stunned again in November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On that topic of unforgivable. This is yet another example of liberals with their irresponsible rhetoric. It has happened far too often and they may be gaining traction in the political landscape but I hope they aren&#8217;t gaining traction. In surveys twice as many people identify themselves as conservatives rather than liberal but sometimes that means little. When asked who people identify with more, because of demagoguing liberals have made Republican a bad name when Republicans are far from conservative.</p>
<p>So how will the elections turn out in November? Only God knows but one thing is certain. If Republicans keep actually tackling issues that conservatives care about such as illegal immigration and curbing spending politicians and the media may be stunned again in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

