Comments on: Was it prescription drugs or was he drinking?

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Sun, 14 May 2006 06:04:42 +0000

- Actually they didn’t even have to drive over there and look for her, she went to them. They’ve had all the info since probably day 2. This is called the “period of letting the dust settle and the whole issue fall off the radar”. Hear anything about the McKinney “investigation” lately. The Grand grand jury seems to have gone MIA. In both cases its the old game of slow rolling, hoping it will all fade from public view and blow over. Everyone knows whats going on, but no one wants to call them out on it. Washington as a group is nothing if not good at circling the wagons.

- Incidently, speaking of McKinney, she continues to act in completely bizaar ways. According to a brief report on FOX, she decided for reasons no one can figure out, to attach a series of 28 autopsy photographs, extremely grizilly and graphic in nature, of some woman who died under mysterious circustances in another country, to some Congressional bill this week. A few of the Representatives said they can’t figure out what in the world she did that for. I think shes either on drugs, or her Liberal craziness has finally unhinged her completely. Even though she gets re-elected because shes from a gerimanded small district in Atlanta, most people think this term will be her last harrah.

- Bang

By: forest hunter

forest hunter — Sun, 14 May 2006 04:12:21 +0000

Bang, that’s rhetorical right?

Who’s posted on the tax rolls as owner/operator? I’d bet several Police officials know very well.

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Sat, 13 May 2006 21:55:44 +0000

- Whats interesting is the length of time the Capital police seem to be taking in “investigating” his where abouts that evening, since the bar in question is only 6 blocks from the Capital area. Guess someone needs to give them the address and the name of the waitress who waited on him that evening and came forward the same day this happened. the authorities just can’t be too careful when it comes to a Kennedy. You and me would have been sitting in a cell on the spot. Best justice money can buy. One question I’m not hearing asked is who tipped the Supervisors so they could rush over and stop justice in its tracks?

- Bang

By: Beth

Beth — Sat, 13 May 2006 19:57:16 +0000

Could not agree with Severian and Benning more — if ONLY the members of this family were held accountable for their actions.

As my dad once said about Ted Kennedy, “How could any Massachusetts constituent look at that man and say, ‘Yep, that’s my senator. I’m so proud to have voted for him!’”

It boggles the mind.

By: benning

benning — Sat, 13 May 2006 14:33:40 +0000

Severian is right. Kennedy constituents never ask what the heck a Kennedy is doing. They simply genuflect before the Hand that feeds them.

Who in Congress is going to put themselves through the MSM gristmill for, “taking cheap shots at that poor young man who is struggling so bravely …” yada, yada, yada.

He’s a Democrat so no one will charge him with his crimes. Now, if were a Republican, we’d already have hints of his pedophilia and murder conpiracies, wouldn’t we?

By: Severian

Severian — Sat, 13 May 2006 14:20:32 +0000

ST, his constituency couldn’t care less, he’s a Kennedy, and that’s all their addled, liberal icon worshiping minds can understand.

Those of us not blinded by the Kennedy/Camelot mystique, can see that, truly, he is indeed a Kennedy, with all the negative baggage that entails.

Some look at the Kennedy clan and see glamor, more realistic people look at the Kennedy clan and see abuses of power, drunks, holier than thou attitudes, and a family who believes the world owes them positions of power just because they had the genetic accident to be related to JFK.