I posted some on it Here.

Of course Mexico does not want immigrants who want to actually work in Mexico, they want businesses, retirees, ect with money – Link

It is amazing that Mexico has the cajones to criticize America for wanting to enforce our border security, to curb the illegal aliens flowing across our borders. When compared to Mexican Constitution on how they are handling their own immigration, how they handle illegal aliens entering their country and now how they want jobs to be for Mexican Citizens only.

But America is always blamed for being to hard on immigrants, especially illegal ones….

Sorry, it really cheeses me off with the do as I say and not as I do mentality of other countries and even our own damn government.

- Bang

I wonder, did they vote for him because he was black? I believe he carried a majority of the black voters.

I cannot believe Nagin got re-elected, after abandoning his city, not instituting an evacuation plan, after leaving busses to flood that could have saved many, and after his racists remarks of a chocolate city….

Sometimes I worry about people.

First Katrina, now these two gentlemen. I wonder how many citizens of New Orleans are wondering if God has it in for the city?

To make sure they get treated like North Korea, instead of like Iraq.

It is when insane countries like Iran try and get nukes and threaten to wipe other countries off the map and if anyone tries to stop them or put sanctions on them or refer them to the useless UN, they will be ‘severely hurt’.

At this point in time, I do not think any other country needs ot have nukes, we have existing nukes from before, but as the world slowly becomes more peaceful I can see those finally going away also – as long as the others do also. Little countries with madmen at the helm need not have nukes.

- But theres a reason I asked the question which I’d talk to if any of the Liberals respond…..

- Bang

I would like to turn it on its head though, and re-ask the the msae question…..

If this was President Bush, and the US saying that we were going to wipe off another country from the map, and President Bush says the ‘program’ he is using for nuclear is for electricity only, and yet enriched uranium (15 to 20 times the amount of enrichment needed for regular electricity and is at the scale for nuclear bomb material) is found, the increase wording of the president that is very threatening, to one specific country and to any that would oppose what he is doing….

What then would the UN and everyone be saying then?

Do you think UN would sit idly by (well duh, were talking about the UN here), I would think they would probably be more vocal about the US than they are on Iran.

Double standards.

What is the difference if both are madmen?

But I can bet you that there would be a big difference in how it would be handled.

- Bang