
| Heritage | 0 | |
| Reuters | 2012 Watch: Mitt Romney’s message from GOP: Step it up |
0 |
| Fox News | Hmm: Obama to give 10 states a pass on No Child Left Behind deadline |
0 |
| CBS LA | Wha? LA County OKs $1,000 Fine For Throwing Football, Frisbee On Beaches |
0 |
| Ballot Box | AZ: Aide injured in Giffords shooting will run to replace her in House |
0 |
Make sure to check out this piece at the Hawaii Reporter. The writer does a good job of piecing together what is known to have happened, what is alleged to have happened, and takes a closer look at those who are making the claims:
According to a May 27 Washington Post article, “only 13-year-old Safa Younis lived — saved, she said, by her mother’s blood spilling onto her, making her look dead when she fell, limp, in a faint….Townspeople led a Washington Post reporter this week to the girl they identified as Safa. Wearing a ponytail and tracksuit, the girl said her mother died trying to gather the girls. The girl burst into tears after a few words. The older couple caring for her apologized and asked the reporter to leave.”
This account differs slightly from an ABC News report which shows a video of Safa Younis. She calmly says yes to leading questions from an off-camera interviewer describing Marines throwing a grenade into the bathroom of her home and killing the other seven members of her family. She responds with amazing composure for one who has witnessed the murder of her parents and siblings. She does not mention her mother’s blood spilling all over her. She says she is 12 years old. Is it staged testimony? This can only be discovered in an investigation or trial.
ITV news March 30 carries yet another interview—this time with a ten-year-old Iraqi girl named Iman Walid. Like Safa, Iman calmly describes the murder of seven members of her family by US Marines in Haditha on November 19. A third person, Aws Fahmi, claims to live next door to the house where the massacre allegedly occurred and also claims to be a friend of the men killed in the taxi. He claims to be an eyewitness.
Ali al-Mashhadani, an Iraqi journalist reporting on the Haditha incident was recently re-arrested by the Marines for suspected insurgent ties. He was held for 12 days. Al-Mashhadani had earlier been held for five months beginning August 8, 2005 and ending in January, 2006. According to Reuters, “Among Mashhadani’s recent stories was reporting from the town of Haditha in March. Following Time magazine’s revelation of accusations that U.S. Marines shot dead 24 civilians there in November, he filmed fresh interviews with local officials and residents that were widely used by international media.” According to the March 19 Time’ article:
A day after the incident, a Haditha journalism student videotaped the scene at the local morgue and at the homes where the killings had occurred. The video was obtained by the Hammurabi Human Rights Group, which cooperates with the internationally respected Human Rights Watch, and has been shared with Time.
This video is the source of all the images being spread across the international media purporting to show the aftermath of the Haditha incident. The “internationally respected” Human Rights Watch (HRW) has been accused of anti-Israel bias and is funded by numerous left-wing foundations including George Soros’ Open Society Institute. HRW accuses US forces of “torture” in Iraq and Afghanistan which, in one report, it defines as, “interrogation techniques including hooding, stripping detainees naked, subjecting them to extremes of heat, cold, noise and light, and depriving them of sleep….” HRW advocates putting US soldiers under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court–a foreign-controlled judiciary.
Read the whole thing, including what the author writes about recent incidents of “blood money” being paid in Iraq – and not just by US forces in Haditha.
Hat tip: Flopping Aces
Update: WOW. Here’s more on other questionable ‘first-hand-accounts’ sources on what allegedly happened at Haditha. Please read all of them, but pay very close attention to this eyewitness account noted in the piece (emphasis added):
CHILCOTE: Eman’s brother, Abdul Rahman (ph), doesn’t say much. The interviewer asks him to show his wounds.
Off camera, a voice in the room is heard asking: “He didn’t have a weapon. What danger did he pose?”
But there is an intriguing variation in Eman’s account the third time she tells it. She says she was expecting the bomb.
WALID (through translator): I was planning to go to school. I was about to get out of bed. I knew the bomb would explode, so I covered my ears. The bomb exploded. The bomb struck an armored vehicle. I don’t know if it was a Humvee or an armored vehicle. When the bomb exploded, they came straight to our house.
CHILCOTE: The question is, was her expectation of the explosion a premonition, a fear based on the sound of the passing convoy? Or was it based on some knowledge? The interviewer does not follow up. He says the 9-year-old got confused and got her story mixed up.
I don’t think she got the story mixed up. She sounded very descriptive to me. How would anyone inside that house have knowledge that a bomb was going to explode on an armored vehicle?
Hat tip: Rebelchick
Prior:
RSS feed for comments on this post.
It’s good you mentioned about ‘blood money’ cause i was just thinking about that.
What better way to get large sums of money that to set up a bunch of American Marines, so that they will be paid large sums of money.
Now, before people go all nuts on me, I am ofering that as ONE of many possible things that could have happened, and I will await a trial to see what really happened. One thing Murtha is not doing by already condemning our troops before they have a trial – guilty before trial in his eyes.
One thing I found interesting is:
She does not sound to be in shock.
She does sound like she is being coached.
I do find it interesting, and somewhat scary, if and I say IF, the interviewer coached her on what to say for the interviewer….
I am not saying these Marines did not do what they did, but what if this is a setup, and the media is playing with this more than just reporting, but actually creating more of the story than what they should?
I want a full investigation into this, they deserve a trial, and are innocent UNTIL proven guilty in a court of Law….
Don’t you agree Murtha?
I wish someone would ask him THAT question!
The more that I see and hear about the “evidence and testimony” against our Marines in this incident, the more it looks very much like a well orchestrated terrorist frame job. There’s a distinct possibility that, contrary to what Murtha and the rest of the usual suspects are bleating, our Marines are being set up, either they didn’t do anything wrong, or if they did something, it’s being manipulated and made to appear far worse than it is by careful exaggeration and manipulation of the press. The insurgents aren’t idiots, they know how to play the media and the general anti-US sentiment in the press and worldwide, and use the idiots in the “human rights” organizations, they play them like a cheap fiddle. They also aren’t above murdering people just so they can blame it on us. I begin to doubt that the investigation will be that fair, due to slanted evidence and testimony, lack of firm real evidence, and pressure to find a guilty party, just like in “Breaker Morant.”
Now the Iraqi’s are refusing to exhume the bodies to allow proper forensic examination, due to “religious” reasons. How convenient, let’s use that excuse of “Moslems will find it insulting so we better kiss their butts or they will get mad” to further suppress evidence that could help us get to the bottom of this.
I say, no exhumation, we cancel the investigation and stop paying any money to the affected parties. If you won’t help us get to the bottom of this, then we don’t care either and we aren’t paying.
Funny, haven’t people been saying all along how the terrorists know how to play the media and the left?
What better way to whip them up in a frenzy and increase the calls of retreat of the troops.
What better way to garner more support for their side.
What better way to paint the troops with another coat of slime.
They cannot win against the military, but they can win by public opinion as they use the media to help spread more support for their cause.
Sanity and it doesn’t take anything for the media to paint our troops with that coat of slime. Nothing but bad news to turn public opinion even if they have to add a little to the story to make us look bad. And never but never print a retraction when they slim our troops.

Actually in a way I welcome these scams, as I’m getting closer and closer to believing this case is, like all the “othres” we’ve seen floated by the ravenous anti-war/military press. Enough of the “ScamGates”, and people will just start ignoring it. I think its already to that point with a lot of the American people. I know a lot of my friends scoff almost automatically when they see these so called “atrocities” played up in the press now.
- They over did it with Abu Graibe, and I’ll bet they’ll over do it with this one too. Theres comments already by the “witness’s” that just don’t square with the way American troops think. Killing live stock intentionally and shotting handcuffed prisoners. Those are all the sort of “pillage and burn” you would expect from the crazies in their culture, but not something our guys would even think of doing. I’m about to toss this one in the gutter with all the rest, as just another propaganda effort by the Jihadists.
- and I absolutely aggree. If they won’t allow autopsies, then the whole thing should be scuttled, period. They don’t want us to see the Russian ammo they were killed with.
- Bang