Comments on: The ‘extra armor’ debate rages on

By: Marshall Art

Marshall Art — Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:56:18 +0000

Just another case of the feel good lefties coming up with a plan that causes more harm than good.

By: Matt B.

Matt B. — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:51:30 +0000

Yea, Dayton! My hometown!

By: Bachbone

Bachbone — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:50:40 +0000

NC Cop – hope you are doing well and on your way back to near-normal.

When all other arguments fail, leftists will say it’s still Bush’s fault for designing the vehicles improperly in the first place. Their effort is not reason seeking; it’s BDS. I think more and more average citizens are able to see the BDS, race and class envy cards in leftist hands are dog-eared, and know when they are being played. Ann Coulter’s new book also exposes how to recognize their “victim” cards. They’ll never run out of cards, but more will be easily identifiable.

By: NC Cop

NC Cop — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 03:55:13 +0000

Take it from me, , all that armor wont make a bit of difference! They are constantly coming up with new and more powerful IED’s that punch right through armor. They blew up an M1 Abrams tank and a couple of Bradley’s where I was.

Also, all that extra armor slows your vehicle waaaaaaay down and speed is your best friend over there. If you can do 70-75 you are much less likely to get hit then if you are going 35-40 loaded down with armor.

The armor “debate” was simply another “I hate Bush” argument, nothing more.