Fraudian slip?

Posted by: ST on October 4, 2006 at 9:43 pm

Democratic congressional candidate Ken Lucas (Kentucky) has landed himself in hot water with certain gay groups after this little slip of the tongue (no pun intended) on Tuesday on the Foley scandal (emphasis added):

GOP leadership should have been wary of former U.S. Rep. Mark Foley because they knew he was gay, Democratic congressional candidate Ken Lucas said Tuesday.

“Those folks (in leadership) had plenty of warning about what was going on,” Lucas told The Kentucky Post editorial board.

“It was common knowledge that Foley was a gay man. To me, when people in positions of leadership saw things around the edges, that should’ve raised red flags, ” he said.

Ooops. Gay man=sexual offender? Nice going, Lucas. If your opponent, incumbent Republican Geoff Davis, had said the same thing, you’d be the next Representative from Kentucky’s 4th Congressional district.

Here’s the latest Foleygate development, via Drudge:

ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER

FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD

Wed Oct 04 2006 20:32:06 ET

A posting on ABCNEWS.COM of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser.

The website PASSIONATE AMERICA detailed the startling exposure late Wednesday.

ABCNEWS said in a statement: “We go to great lengths to prevent the names of alleged sex crime victims from being revealed. On Friday there was a very brief technical glitch on our site which was overridden immediately. It is possible that during that very brief interval a screen name could have been captured. Reviews of the site since then show no unredacted screen names.”

SEX CHAT WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD

On Tuesday ABC news released a high-impact instant message exchange between Foley and, as ABC explained, a young man “under the age of 18.”

ABC headlined the story: “New Foley Instant Messages; Had Internet Sex While Awaiting House Vote”

But upon reviewing the records, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned, the young man was in fact over the age of 18 at the time of the exchange.

A network source explains, messages with the young man and disgraced former Congressman Foley took place before and after the 18th birthday.

Developing…

As Scooby Doo would say, “Ruh roh!”

More: Gay Patriot blasts David Corn’s statement on an alleged-to-exist list circulating in Washington of supposedly gay Republican staffers. Here’s more on that “List”:

On CBS News on Tuesday, correspondent Gloria Borger reported that there’s anger among House Republicans at what an unidentified House GOPer called a “network of gay staffers and gay members who protect each other and did the Speaker a disservice.” The implication is that these gay Republicans somehow helped page-pursuing Mark Foley before his ugly (and possibly illegal) conduct was exposed. The List–drawn up by gay politicos–is a partial accounting of who on Capitol Hill might be in that network.

It’s getting nas-tee in DC. I’d wear boots if I were visiting. And bring a shovel, too.

Update I: What the hell? Stay away from Hastert’s house! Damn media vipers.

Update II: In my prior update on the photo of Denny Hastert, I’d only seen the one snapshot. But there was more than one photo (one that I missed) of Hastert in his home taken by a snooping photog outside of his home. Allah found the other one (scroll). My comment at HA:

Sick.

I’ve seen photos of the Prez sitting in his office – photos that were taken outside. Those are understandable. The man is a public servant, he’s at work, and the public has the right to know that he’s working.

But a man’s home, OTOH, is his private castle and unless he’s invited the mediots around to take snapshots of him in his house, they have no business doing so. It smacks of standing-behind-a-tree to catch a glimpse tabloid journalism. These two photos are prime examples of just how low the media have fallen in their efforts to sink Republicans during an election year.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

  • Blue Crab Boulevard trackbacked with On The Jumping Of Sharks
  • Alarming News trackbacked with Keep an eye on those gays!
  • 10 Responses to “Fraudian slip?”

    Comments

    1. Mwalimu Daudi says:

      Who woulda thunk it – gay bashing from Democrats and the MSM?!

      One wonders – is David Duke more than just Mother Sheehan’s #1 fan? Could he be the real brains behind the Democratic party – the “power behind the throne” so to speak?

    2. stoo says:

      I heard Bob Beckel — Dem strategist* and Fox news contributor — say almost the exact same thing as Lucas over the weekend. My first thought was that being gay isn’t the same as being a pedophile, what is he talking about?

      * I’m starting to believe that Democrat and strategist are mutually exclusive terms.

    3. Great White Rat says:

      I know some of you all here don’t care too much for Ann Coulter, but her column Wednesday nails the donks’ mentality perfectly:

      When Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee found unprotected e-mails from the Democrats about their plan to oppose Miguel Estrada’s judicial nomination because he was Hispanic, Democrats erupted in rage that their e-mails were being read. The Republican staffer responsible was forced to resign.

      But Democrats are on their high horses because Republicans in the House did not immediately wiretap Foley’s phones when they found out he was engaging in e-mail chitchat with a former page about what the kid wanted for his birthday.

      The Democrats say the Republicans should have done all the things Democrats won’t let us do to al Qaeda — solely because Foley was rumored to be gay. Maybe we could get Democrats to support the NSA wiretapping program if we tell them the terrorists are gay.

      Ah, yes…Foley was homosexual, therefore he’s a likely sexual predator and we must watch him closely (thank you, Bob Beckel…).

      Here’s an interesting question for the Dems: how would they have reacted if Foley were a Boy Scout leader instead of a GOP congressman? They’d have the ACLU lawyers working double-overtime arguing that you can’t conclude anything from the Emails or IMs, so get over it and let him take the kids camping already.

    4. Drewsmom says:

      I’m getting sick of this story … its gross and yukky but what I really wanta know is WHO KNEW EXACTLEY WHAT, AND WE DON’T KNOW YET, AND how george soros hand’s are all in this thing and probably abc’s.
      cnn on larry, suspender king, last night had a panel on with all left wingers and only one Republican, JC Watts was the ONLY ONE MAKING GOOD SENSE. cnn, msnbc, the ABC’s and even Joe and Tucker are starting to make me ill.
      I’m pissed that Bainer and Blunt are speaking against Hasterd, they need to let the dems do the talking since they are the moral party and can handle this, yeah, and I’m Christie Blinkley. **==

    5. Tom TB says:

      I’m not all that interested in this pre-election mess; Foley(R) quit, Massachusetts voters tend to send their miscreants(D), back to congress again and again.

    6. PCD says:

      stoo,

      Bob Beckel is a blackmailer. He tried blackmailing the College of Electors to vote for Al Gore in 2000. This man should be shunned, if not exiled!

    7. benning says:

      Amazing how this story has taken over the News broadcasts. Silly.