Comments on: Boston Legal: Liberal propaganda at its worst

By: PCD

PCD — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:56:52 +0000

I thought she was wierd. What about the big, “mountain man” guy who had the models sit around him after he picked them. He said he was having a party, but his sister was right when she told him to take the deal when it was over 200K.

I like those periodic money plus offers. What did you think about the 19 year old who took the green Cadillac Escalade?

By: sanity

sanity — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:46:19 +0000

Personally PCD I liked the episode with the woman everytime she got a low amoutn would spank Howie…I thought that was hilarious…and th girls holding the cases thoughts so too.

By: PCD

PCD — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 19:06:57 +0000

Hey, Sanity, wasn’t the Italian guy entertaining? I felt bad that the first model to speak Italian to him had the case with the $2 Million in it. I was waiting for him to pick #1, Claudia. Her mother is Italian from Italy, and Claudia speaks Italian.

One of my dreams is to be on the show and to pick #13, Layla. I’d say, “Ok, Layla, I’m not Vincent Kennedy McMahon, so don’t bodyslam me with one of the big amounts.” Layla is an Ex-WWE wrestler.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:14:32 +0000

How weird that you would post this on the same day I gave up on the show and took it off the season pass list. It was a great show for the first two years. They screwed something up last year, and it hasn’t been enjoyable to watch since .

By: CT

CT — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:12:28 +0000

I haven’t watched network TV in years. There have been hugely popular shows that came and went and I never knew about until someone at work asked if I had ever watched it. I haven’t even watched 24 (probably never will either). So much of what I have seen has been pure propaganda. I don’t even want to give potentially good network shows a chance. I write it off as left wing (which it is about 99% of the time) and watch Discovery channel.

By: Severian

Severian — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:57:48 +0000

I honestly can’t remember the last time I watched regular network television shows. They have dumbed down most of them so far, and most are so derivative, that it’s just impossible. The occasional good show gets missed just because of the fact I’ve basically given up on the networks. I hear Lost is great, and plan on renting the series (have problems with commercials anyway) to see it.

I don’t watch that much TV anyway, I have only a few “must watch” shows on cable networks, so when I do watch I really don’t like getting PO’d by the liberal inanity that passes for entertainment, which is one reason I stay away from the Big 3. It’s not relaxing or entertaining to watch a show like the one ST referenced.

By: sanity

sanity — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:55:24 +0000

I will stick to my fav’s NCIS and CSI.

Gameshows of ‘Deal or No Deal’ – Howie is still funny.

Still enjoy shows like ‘Scrubs’ and M*A*S*H.

And sorry to say, ’24′ loses out to ‘Heroes’ since it switched time spots…but then again, that is also why they make VCRs…[chuckles]

By: PCD

PCD — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:42:28 +0000

I don’t watch Boston Legal. Not even Capt. Kirk or Seven of Nine being on the show were drawing cards. Shatner’s touch is slipping. He failed with “Tek Wars” and with “Show Me The Money”.

The TV schedule really sucked last night. I watched O’Reilly until “Dog the Bounty Hunter” came on. I am getting tired of “Trick My Truck” and “OverHaulin’” reruns.

When does NFL training camps start?

What about applying the “Fairness Doctrine” to ALL network shows?

By: jeff

jeff — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 12:55:44 +0000

I actually watch this show pretty regularly. Yes, it has a disgustingly far-left agenda. Yes, it can be argued that shows like this (and Will and Grace, and all of the medical shows were the dr.’s have sex with all the other dr.’s), but damn Shatner is funny…

I agree with you on most of your take on the show from last night. My one big disagreement is your take on the girl who wanted the medication. I didn’t see it as a win for “being the victim,” I saw it as a right for parental notification. We (pro-life conservatives) advocate abolishing abortion all together, but since that seems far away we try to chip away at it INCLUDING the advocation of parental notification. So here we have the parents disagreeing on how to handle the notification that they had regarding their daughters desire to take a pill that A) Suppresses part of your memory (and therefore part of who you are) B) Could have long-term effects due to the repressed memories and C) Is NOT a mainstream drug.

Now, let’s take a look at the alternative message that could have been sent if this fictional girl had won this fictional case: things we don’t like from our past can just be forgotten. If we have a bad experience, we don’t need to work through it, we can just take a pill. Sixteen year-old girls know better about what to do with their bodies (minds?) than her parents.

Still, I think the bigger issue in this particular fictional case was the fact that the FATHER was the psychologist who had evaluated his daughter and perscribed the pills. The mother simply wanted another opinion to be considered in regards to this very important decision.

With that said, let’s shift to Spader’s case. Good God. I’m right there with you on that. As a regular (for whatever reason) viewer of the show, I can tell you that Spader NEVER says anything in his closings. He is nearly as obnoxious as Obama about this: he speaks beautiful but he says nothing of substance. The ending (with the low-blows at Bennett etc.) was distasteful at best, disrespetful and unneccissary at the worst…

I admire the oratory skills Spader’s character has, but he always wins on his skills not on his points. Isn’t this liberal character definitive of the majority of the left? They can rarely win on the issues, and so their campaigns become surrounded by fancy rhetoric that seems inarguable.