Because terrorists have dressed as women to escape capture, hiding behind burkas and hijabs like the cowards they are.

Great White Rat I’m not bringing up the chickenhawk argument

No??? What the hell was THIS supposed to imply then?

Do you want directions to your local recruiting station in Charlotte?

You were doing it, and you don’t even have the honesty to admit it.

He continues:

but the other day you insinuatied Dems like me actually help Al-Queda which is offensive to say the least.
I didn’t insinuate anything; I said it openly. And yes, having you guys work against our military and by extension for the other side, is certainly offensive.

Go back and read American Vet’s post, specifically the part about the West Point motto. He’s put his finger precisely on one of the big differences between you libs and the rest of us. It used to be that politics stopped at the water’s edge. It was understood that when our military was under fire, all Americans wanted them to be victorious. Not ‘find an exit strategy’. WIN.

Compare the way the Dems act today with the way the GOP acted when Clinton sent the military into Kosovo. Some of us, myself included, had doubts about what national interest was being served, but once the troops were involved, no one tried to gain poltical advantage by defunding them, or destroying their intelligence gathering, or slurring them as Nazis and worse. And that was with an enemy who had no intention of following us back here if we withdrew. You libs, on the other hand, waste no opportunity to undercut the war and hasten our defeat. Even though you know down inside that the end result will be terrorist attacks here at home, you don’t care – not as long as you get control of Congress or the White House.

Want people to stop thinking you’re on the other side in the WOT? Start acting like it.

And then there’s this:
I got other stuff on my mind concerning personal stuff up here freezing my tail off in Queens

Stop complaining – when you freeze your tail off, you’re supplying carbon offsets that Al Gore can use to keep his pool heated. Konwing that oughta make you feel all warm and toasty inside.

“Secondly Amvet after 20 years of military service does he honestly expect the American public to tolerate Islamofascists setting off IED’S?”

Here is exactly what I expect. I expect the American people to support their troops as they perform their duty. The motto at the United States Military Academy is “Duty, Honor, County” not “Duty, Honor, Country, when I agree with the Administration”.
I hear people from the left like you say “what is our exit strategy”? Well, here it is WIN!!!! DEFEAT THE TERRORISTS!!!
Now as to your question of IEDs. The IEDs are being set off in Iraq! I am very sorry for the innocent Iraqis and the American servicemen and women who are killed or wounded. But I know for a fact, the American people will tolerate Islamofascists setting off IEDs in Iraq long before they will tolerate IEDs being set off in the United States.
The servicemen and women are all volunteers like I was. They know exactly what they are volunteering for and what they re-enlist/continue with their commission for. They, like many of us who comment here, are very PROUD of the job they are doing!!! Shame on the left for not being PROUD!!
Instead of trying to slow bleed the troop’s funding for their job, the left should demand funding for the troops be increased. The fastest way home for our troops is DEFEAT THE TERRORISTS!!!
If we follow the democrats plan for victory, tuck our tails between our legs and run home, the Islamofascists will follow us home and attack us here.
For someone who says they were in the military you sure sound like a defeatist. How long did you last in the military? Not long I am sure.

Yeah a typical Republican in my opinion happy about getting what they want on the cheap and screwing your neighbor not loving them that’s real christian. Typical

This coming from a person who himself has a criminal background. Which one of your neighbors did you screw tommy to become a felon?? Damn how I wish I could be so hypocritical.

As far as Jesus, and John E. I have to wonder how John would know anything what Jesus thinks. Yeah like so many libs they can toss out the garbage like Love thy neighbor like thy self, and pontificate upon this thought endlessly. It truly is amazing. Jesus is going to instantly judge his enemies, Sadamn Hussein who murdered hundreds of thousands of the people he was responsible for would be judge by Jesus, and it wouldn’t be for riches, and Eternal life. What did God say about Abel’s blood when he was chatting with Cain?? It called out for justice. Ending Sadamn’s ability to murder his population, is the first and foremost the greatest objective of this war. Tommy and so many conveinently forget these facts and harp on such a stupid arguement, which has been so easily defeated, that I don’t even have a care for his opinion. Typically so many on the left have no understanding of the war on terror outside of the lies that the Main Stream Media tells them, which they swallow hook line and sinker.

Getting back to John E. I don’t know how this guy can sleep at night. He took 30% or more from the tragic circumstances of these mothers and babies. He is wealthy due to their tragedy. Yet his defenders believe this is the actions of an honorable man. I don’t think so. Somehow John E’s 28,000 sq ft mansion and his 3000sq ft Beach house equates him to just a regular joe in their thinking. I too get upset with all of this religious political pandering, but I get upset with the fool Christians who want to believe these deceptions. Not the idiots who want to practice the deceit, if you have half a brain you can see thru them. – Lorica

Here’s an idea, tommy, that you guys on the left might want to think about. I’m completely serious about this.

Here it is:

Please STOP caring about our troops. Instead, start caring about the islamofascist terrorists.

Once you’ve decided to support the islamofascists, maybe Democrats will stand in the well of the Senate and compare AQ and the Taliban to the Nazis and Pol Pot. After all, that’s what Democrats said about our troops while claiming to support them.

Maybe you’ll send protesters to the madrassas and work to keep islamofascists from recruiting there. You know, the way you do at our universities to try to show how you support our troops.

Maybe you’ll organize rallies in front of the caves in Pakistan and encourage AQ and Taliban troops to shoot their leaders. You know, the way you guys now hold up signs saying ‘we support our troops when they shoot their officers’.

Maybe the NY Times will work on revealing all the intelligence gathering operations of the islamists, making it easier for US troops to find and kill them. You know, the same way the NYT shows its support for our troops by revealing all the secret details of our intelligence systems, thereby hurting our war effort.

Maybe you guys will publish all the details of AQ’s financial transactions and how they fund terrorism. Or try to cut off their funding completely. You know, the way you’ve been helping terrorists hide the details by publishing stories about how we were following terrorist cash, and the way you’re even now trying to cut US military funding – to show how you support the US troops.

Once your side is officially siding with the enemy, maybe we’ll get to see John Kerry denounce the islamofascists as a bunch of dunces. You know, the way he does with our soliders and Marines now.

There are a lot more ways you can apply this – if you need any I’m sure the other commenters here can provide suggestions – but you get the drift.

Oh, I hope your pusher gives you a better grade of drugs next time. This bad batch is causing you to post some really inane stuff today.

Well, ST, keep in mind that this same Silky Pony claims to have channeled the thoughts of an unborn baby (oops, sorry – for you pro-abortion people, fetus) in front of a jury. So maybe he’s channeling Jesus now.

Now as for tommy in nyc…

You’re not really going to try the tired old chickenhawk meme again, are you? It’s never worked before anyplace outside of DU, Kos, or HuffPost. If that’s all you have, you’ve already surrendered intellectually.

Second, her past came back and bit her in the butt. Her personal blog, and how she conducted herself, and the things she said was brought to light and when you are ruing for office, the person running and those associated with you get scrutinized.

Edwards should have gotten a less controversial blogger to help him. There are more left leaning blogs ot there that are not like hers, that actually have civil discourse and don’t resort to the type of behaviour she exhibited.

Her actions were the cause of her not keeping her job, not the right. Again you are misplacing blame.

The right may have lionized her, but if the shoe was on the other foot, I believe the left would be going batshit for a long time…in fact if I remember correctly, there was not long ago a stir caused by a rigt side blogger blogging for the newspaper that had step aside because of his past. I am sure he needed the money too, but because of his actions in the past is why he lost his job…and many on the left brought his actions up to light.

There is nothing wrong with that, but don’t be hypocritical when dealing with blogs or bloggers. You cannot bring the light of one bloggers past up and question their ability to be truthful and accurate, and then play the sympathy card with hers.