<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About that Dem debate in Nevada &#8230; (MORE: FOX NEWS ISSUES STATEMENT)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:11:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rovin</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/comment-page-1/#comment-701908</link>
		<dc:creator>Rovin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/#comment-701908</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;* There was a desire to include a panelist from a more &lt;strong&gt;progressive&lt;/strong&gt; outlet, such as Air America, to ensure balance at the questioners table.

* There was also a desire to bolster a &lt;strong&gt;progressive &lt;/strong&gt;media outlet, such as Air America or Politics TV that could use the opportunity to grow its constituency.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I feel compelled to re-define this implied liberal agenda that the left refers to as &quot;&lt;strong&gt;progressive&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;.

Because if this is what defines &lt;strong&gt;progressive&lt;/strong&gt;, I would have to submit that progressive = &quot;regressive diversionaries&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>* There was a desire to include a panelist from a more <strong>progressive</strong> outlet, such as Air America, to ensure balance at the questioners table.</p>
<p>* There was also a desire to bolster a <strong>progressive </strong>media outlet, such as Air America or Politics TV that could use the opportunity to grow its constituency.</p></blockquote>
<p>I feel compelled to re-define this implied liberal agenda that the left refers to as &#8220;<strong>progressive</strong>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Because if this is what defines <strong>progressive</strong>, I would have to submit that progressive = &#8220;regressive diversionaries&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great White Rat</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/comment-page-1/#comment-701882</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/#comment-701882</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you are afraid of journalists, how will you face the real dangers in the world?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s not so much the journalists they&#039;re afraid of here, it&#039;s the extremists within their own party.  It&#039;s MoveOn.org, DU, Kos and the like.

So if Silky Pony and his ilk wet their pants at a cross word from MoveOn, how well do you think they&#039;ll handle threats from Ahmedinejad, or Kim Jong-Il?  Or worse, from Putin?

By the way, did you notice who, significantly, did &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; get out in front of this stunt?  Hillary.  I detest her, but you have to give her credit for playing it smart here.  Compared to Edwards and Richardson, she comes off looking more mature and &lt;em&gt;presidential&lt;/em&gt; for not throwing a tantrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you are afraid of journalists, how will you face the real dangers in the world?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s not so much the journalists they&#8217;re afraid of here, it&#8217;s the extremists within their own party.  It&#8217;s MoveOn.org, DU, Kos and the like.</p>
<p>So if Silky Pony and his ilk wet their pants at a cross word from MoveOn, how well do you think they&#8217;ll handle threats from Ahmedinejad, or Kim Jong-Il?  Or worse, from Putin?</p>
<p>By the way, did you notice who, significantly, did <strong>not</strong> get out in front of this stunt?  Hillary.  I detest her, but you have to give her credit for playing it smart here.  Compared to Edwards and Richardson, she comes off looking more mature and <em>presidential</em> for not throwing a tantrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stout Republican</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/comment-page-1/#comment-701874</link>
		<dc:creator>Stout Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 08:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/#comment-701874</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you are afraid of journalists, how will you face the real dangers in the world?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Gold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you are afraid of journalists, how will you face the real dangers in the world?</p></blockquote>
<p>Gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hang Right Politics - Archives &#187; Democrats Decline Real Debate</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/comment-page-1/#comment-701858</link>
		<dc:creator>Hang Right Politics - Archives &#187; Democrats Decline Real Debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/#comment-701858</guid>
		<description>[...] Candidates, Democrats, Media Bias by Kathy at 02:11 on Mar 10th, 2007 &#124; &#124; Trackback URL &#124; Print This Post &#124;        No Comments&#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Candidates, Democrats, Media Bias by Kathy at 02:11 on Mar 10th, 2007 | | Trackback URL | Print This Post |        No Comments&raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/comment-page-1/#comment-701833</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/#comment-701833</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;This is an example of the Democrat politician diplomacy skills&lt;/strong&gt;.

I&#039;ll have none of it.... It&#039;s the opposite of diplomacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>This is an example of the Democrat politician diplomacy skills</strong>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have none of it&#8230;. It&#8217;s the opposite of diplomacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/comment-page-1/#comment-701825</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/#comment-701825</guid>
		<description>This is proof dems can only answer friendly and leading questions. They would never win another election without media manipulation. They may be cowards but they aren&#039;t stupid cowards. In the world of euphemism - home planet for the dems - an honest discussion is not a possibility.

I think republicans should reciprocate and only debate on FOX - which isn&#039;t conservative - it&#039;s balanced...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is proof dems can only answer friendly and leading questions. They would never win another election without media manipulation. They may be cowards but they aren&#8217;t stupid cowards. In the world of euphemism &#8211; home planet for the dems &#8211; an honest discussion is not a possibility.</p>
<p>I think republicans should reciprocate and only debate on FOX &#8211; which isn&#8217;t conservative &#8211; it&#8217;s balanced&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JammieWearingFool</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/comment-page-1/#comment-701804</link>
		<dc:creator>JammieWearingFool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/#comment-701804</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Democrats Cave on Fox Debate&lt;/strong&gt;

For some strange reason, the crazy people consider a debate in front of a limited audience as some kind of victory. They&#039;re not called the nutroots for nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Democrats Cave on Fox Debate</strong></p>
<p>For some strange reason, the crazy people consider a debate in front of a limited audience as some kind of victory. They&#8217;re not called the nutroots for nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G-Monster</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/comment-page-1/#comment-701801</link>
		<dc:creator>G-Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/#comment-701801</guid>
		<description>I must point out the reason for Fox cable news success, is that all 3 major networks, plus, CNN, MSNBC, and all the others, all pander to the left wing.

I&#039;m surprised one of the big 3 doesn&#039;t just go ahead and tilt there news to the right instead of the left, as it is quite obvious they would gain viewer share.

Hypothetically, they would get 50 percent viewer share, and the other 2 would be splitting the other 50%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must point out the reason for Fox cable news success, is that all 3 major networks, plus, CNN, MSNBC, and all the others, all pander to the left wing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised one of the big 3 doesn&#8217;t just go ahead and tilt there news to the right instead of the left, as it is quite obvious they would gain viewer share.</p>
<p>Hypothetically, they would get 50 percent viewer share, and the other 2 would be splitting the other 50%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G-Monster</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/comment-page-1/#comment-701799</link>
		<dc:creator>G-Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/#comment-701799</guid>
		<description>Well...

The republicans have debated on liberal stations for years and years. Therefore, I suggest, the republicans only debate on fox news with conservative moderators. 

I also suggest that any presidential or vice presidential debates that feature candidates from both parties, be divided evenly between fox news and a lib station.

And to take it one step further, the political affiliations of the moderators that ask the questions in these debates, should be divided evenly.

I&#039;m glad the dems did this, because now we can seek fairness all around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;</p>
<p>The republicans have debated on liberal stations for years and years. Therefore, I suggest, the republicans only debate on fox news with conservative moderators. </p>
<p>I also suggest that any presidential or vice presidential debates that feature candidates from both parties, be divided evenly between fox news and a lib station.</p>
<p>And to take it one step further, the political affiliations of the moderators that ask the questions in these debates, should be divided evenly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad the dems did this, because now we can seek fairness all around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NC Cop</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/comment-page-1/#comment-701787</link>
		<dc:creator>NC Cop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/#comment-701787</guid>
		<description>Hypocrites AND cowards!!  What a great combination!!!  For the first time in my life I am generally afraid for our country.  I don&#039;t know if there numbers are growing or if they are just more vocal, but these nutroots seem to be eveywhere.  God help us all if some of them get elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hypocrites AND cowards!!  What a great combination!!!  For the first time in my life I am generally afraid for our country.  I don&#8217;t know if there numbers are growing or if they are just more vocal, but these nutroots seem to be eveywhere.  God help us all if some of them get elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/comment-page-1/#comment-701776</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/03/09/about-that-dem-debate-in-nevada/#comment-701776</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll cheer to this one. :)

No need to watch what isn&#039;t on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll cheer to this one. <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_smiley.gif' alt='&#58;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#41;' /></p>
<p>No need to watch what isn&#8217;t on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

