<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll method checking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:52:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice &#187; &#187; Newsweek Thinks We&#8217;re A Bunch Of Boobs</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-708106</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice &#187; &#187; Newsweek Thinks We&#8217;re A Bunch Of Boobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 12:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/#comment-708106</guid>
		<description>[...] Also, ST has a comment on this, as well.  Bookmark to:   Posted by: Brian in: Main Stream Media, Politics, Polls, 2008 Elections at 7:00 am Permalink&#160;&#124;&#160;trackback (right click and save)&#160;&#124;&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also, ST has a comment on this, as well.  Bookmark to:   Posted by: Brian in: Main Stream Media, Politics, Polls, 2008 Elections at 7:00 am Permalink&nbsp;|&nbsp;trackback (right click and save)&nbsp;|&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewsmom</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-708099</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewsmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 09:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/#comment-708099</guid>
		<description>Lets face the facts here folks, ALL of the msm is biased except Fox, PERIOD.  Its been proved over and over and over.
This is just another hit piece on Conservatives and I&#039;m getting sick and damned tired of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets face the facts here folks, ALL of the msm is biased except Fox, PERIOD.  Its been proved over and over and over.<br />
This is just another hit piece on Conservatives and I&#8217;m getting sick and damned tired of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vatar</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-708097</link>
		<dc:creator>vatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 09:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/#comment-708097</guid>
		<description>Typically you see about 55%-45% female to male ratio in this kind of poll.  Females tend to be more Democratic than men.  I notice that they didn&#039;t give the sex ratio for this poll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typically you see about 55%-45% female to male ratio in this kind of poll.  Females tend to be more Democratic than men.  I notice that they didn&#8217;t give the sex ratio for this poll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camojack</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-708096</link>
		<dc:creator>camojack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 08:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/#comment-708096</guid>
		<description>Surprised?! [-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprised?! <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_silent.gif' alt='&#91;&#45;&#40;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#91;&#45;&#40;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great White Rat</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-708090</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 03:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/#comment-708090</guid>
		<description>Doc, that would serve as a control on the polling organization, if they strive for accuracy.  

If their poll results skew heavily toward one party or the other, when all other factors indicate a much narrower margin, then they should examine their methodology and sampling to find the source of the error, rather than rushing to print with it.

The fact that Newsweek chose to ignore the warning flags instead of revisiting their polling procedures tells me that they are either terminally sloppy or reliably biased.  Given the body of their past work, it&#039;s not difficult to conclude the latter choice is the true one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc, that would serve as a control on the polling organization, if they strive for accuracy.  </p>
<p>If their poll results skew heavily toward one party or the other, when all other factors indicate a much narrower margin, then they should examine their methodology and sampling to find the source of the error, rather than rushing to print with it.</p>
<p>The fact that Newsweek chose to ignore the warning flags instead of revisiting their polling procedures tells me that they are either terminally sloppy or reliably biased.  Given the body of their past work, it&#8217;s not difficult to conclude the latter choice is the true one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Washboard</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-708089</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Washboard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 03:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/#comment-708089</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re probably right.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to learn that there&#039;s a certain amount of bandwagon-jumping that takes place after an election, especially among the &quot;leaners.&quot;  You know:  go with the winner.  Now they&#039;ll self-identify as Democrats.  Somewhere down the road after a big Republican victory, it might go the other way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re probably right.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to learn that there&#8217;s a certain amount of bandwagon-jumping that takes place after an election, especially among the &#8220;leaners.&#8221;  You know:  go with the winner.  Now they&#8217;ll self-identify as Democrats.  Somewhere down the road after a big Republican victory, it might go the other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-708084</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 02:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/#comment-708084</guid>
		<description>You know I am not much of a cynic, but I seriously doubt there are that many more Democrats in this country.  If so J. F&#039;ing would have won in 2004 hands down, but as we know, he didn&#039;t.  - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I am not much of a cynic, but I seriously doubt there are that many more Democrats in this country.  If so J. F&#8217;ing would have won in 2004 hands down, but as we know, he didn&#8217;t.  &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Washboard</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-708081</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Washboard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 00:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/06/poll-method-checking/#comment-708081</guid>
		<description>Question 26 in the poll:

&lt;I&gt; &quot;Do you consider yourself a Republican, Democrat, or Independent?&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

I&#039;m no expert on polling techniques, so I&#039;ll listen to anyone who can straighten me out on this, but doesn&#039;t the question suggest that the party affiliation was determined &lt;I&gt;after&lt;/I&gt; the person chose to participate in the poll, rather than &lt;I&gt;before&lt;/I&gt;?  Also:  in light of the recent election results, wouldn&#039;t one expect to see more people now self-identifying as Democrats?  That would go along with the fact that so many Democratic candidates were elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question 26 in the poll:</p>
<p><i> &#8220;Do you consider yourself a Republican, Democrat, or Independent?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m no expert on polling techniques, so I&#8217;ll listen to anyone who can straighten me out on this, but doesn&#8217;t the question suggest that the party affiliation was determined <i>after</i> the person chose to participate in the poll, rather than <i>before</i>?  Also:  in light of the recent election results, wouldn&#8217;t one expect to see more people now self-identifying as Democrats?  That would go along with the fact that so many Democratic candidates were elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

