
| Free Beacon | 0 | |
| AP | 0 | |
| Power Line | 0 | |
| B’berg | 2012 Watch: Gingrich Seeks to Ease Fundraising Woes as Las Vegas Checks Slowing Down |
0 |
| The Hill | Scandal: Pelosi might have skirted House ethics rules on campaign solicitations |
0 |
The anti-competition crowd, pumped up by renewed Congressional calls for reinstating the Fairness Doctrine as well as their successful intimidation tactics against Democrats to not participate in debates co-hosted by Fox news, are turning their attentions now to Fox News’ advertisers:
NEW YORK (AP) – Liberal activists are stepping up their campaign against Fox News Channel by pressuring advertisers not to patronize the network.
MoveOn.org, the Campaign for America’s Future and liberal blogs like DailyKos.com are asking thousands of supporters to monitor who is advertising on the network. Once a database is gathered, an organized phone-calling campaign will begin, said Jim Gilliam, vice president of media strategy for Brave New Films, a company that has made anti-Fox videos.
The groups have successfully pressured Democratic presidential candidates not to appear at any debate sponsored by Fox, and are also trying to get Home Depot Inc. to stop advertising there.
At least 5,000 people nationwide have signed up to compile logs on who is running commercials on Fox, Gilliam said. The groups want to first concentrate on businesses running local ads, as opposed to national commercials.
“It’s a lot more effective for Sam’s Diner to get calls from 10 people in his town than going to the consumer complaint department of some pharmaceutical company,” Gilliam said.
Some of videos produced by Gilliam’s company compile statements made by Fox anchors and guests that the activists consider misleading, such as those that question global warming.
[...]
MoveOn.org is campaigning against Fox because it says the network characterizes itself as a fair news network when it consistently favors a conservative point of view, said Adam Green, the organization’s spokesman.
“We’re not trying to silence anybody,” Green said. “Rush Limbaugh has a right to be on the air—he admits his point of view. Fox doesn’t.”
Bulls–t. That’s exactly what the Fairness Doctrine cries are about, and that’s what this dumb campaign to punish Fox News is about: Silencing dissent – and there’s a strong element of anti-competition, too, because these same liberals, for all their talk of wanting to “compete in the arena of ideas” hate competition, especially when you consider that them trying to compete with the very popular conservative talk radio has bombed miserably.
This is disturbing, to say the least. Of course, everyone has the ‘right’ to pressure advertisers to not sponsor a show/network, but you should be doing it for the right reasons, not just because you can’t stand other points of view other than your own.
I remember after Dr. Laura’s TV show had been cancelled thanks in part to the overwhelming pressure of militiant gays and other hardcore lefties (pressure which went to extremes by some people actually placing flyers against Dr. Laura in the mailboxes of her neighbors, according to Tammy Bruce) and how they actually celebrated it as though working to silence someone with an alternative viewpoint was something to be happy about.
That is one of the core functions of liberal outfits like the Soros-funded Media Matters and Moveon.org: to silence opinions and comments that they find ‘offensive.’ You may remember that it was a Media Matters punk who monitored the Don Imus show until the “nappy headed hos” comment came along, and it spiraled from there and you know the rest (and as a side note, when all this was going on, Media Matters tried to paint Don Imus as a conservative, as if to imply that a liberal would never say such racist remarks. Right.).
Never ever let a hardcore liberal convince you that they’re ok with the airing of opposing viewpoints. If something doesn’t jive with their warped preconceived notions, they’ll come after you in a New York minute if they think they have a shot at ‘winning.’ It’s disgusting, and goes totally against what this country is all about, no matter if it’s ‘technically’ legal. Having the right to do something doesn’t make it right to do.
What would be interesting to do is wait for this big ‘list’ of advertisers to be published (and you know they will be) and for people who are opposed to this type of intimidation to call those advertisers and tell them how much you support their right to advertise on whatever show/network they want to.
And another thing: if conservative ideas are so ‘easily refutable’ as the left likes to say/imply that they are, then they need to get busy refuting them. All this shows is their pettiness, jealousy, socialistic tendencies, and willingness to do ‘whatever it takes’ to silence the opposition.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
It’s high time that Jim Gilliam and his organization were hit with a dozen lawsuits. Let him make his phone calls, let him make his films and let everyone else divvy up his house and his bank accounts.
ST “All this shows is their pettiness, jealousy, socialistic tendencies, and willingness to do ‘whatever it takes’ to silence the opposition.”
Sounds like the usual suspects since 1960. The left/MSM/Dems have usual “clever” politics to seek to influence voters since JFK inherited FDR style politics from his father. One day someone better informed than us mere mortals may search archives to find the unshredded documents to tell the whole story. I have a feeling the whole story has not been told for a long time.
The broadcasters like the free license and the free protection, but they just don’t want the public involved in telling them whether they are actually serving the public interest..
Unlike newspapers and movies and blogs and cable channels, the federal government gives commercial broadcasters a free license to use public property-the airwaves. There are still more people who want these licenses than the government is able to satisfy. In exchange for this very valuable and scarce license, and federal protection against “pirate” (unlicensed) radio operators, broadcasters are supposed to operate in the public interest.
Same story…the conservatives act like grown ups, the libs act like…immature grown ups. I was gonna say kids, but that is an insult to kids.
The libs want to have thier say on every issue, but go absolutely insane if someone with an opposing viewpoint makes thier point known.
I will post this same message on any other posts I can find today where it applies.
I don’t know if this is true but…it says Lowes pulls advertising from O’Reilly show. If it turns out to be true, I think I’ll stop shoppping at Lowe’s and they can rely on the Kos Kids to keep them afloat.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/7/27/205510/101
The lib blogs vs conservative blogs kind of reminds me of spy vs. spy from mad magazine.
So Fox doesn’t have a right to be on the air because they don’t admit to their bias?
So where does this leave the rest of the MSM?
Perhaps these folks would like each broadcaster to sign a “point of view” statement before being given a license?
Most often it would begin like this:
“We the [name of broadcaster] do certify that our point of view is [liberal] [moderate] [conservative] [libertarian] [other--describe]. . . ”