Sometimes I really wonder why is it that when dissenting Americans to the policies of this Admin get slandered as giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

As if the previous administration was a pure as the driven snow when it came to dissenters. How many people had the Justice Dept. attacked, just because they spoke out against the Clintons?? I am still waiting for my apology from Hillary for her “Vast Right Wing Conspiracy” Comment. The whole Bill and Monica thing was just made up by the Republicans. That liar knew at that time that Bill was doing interns, and she attacked the right, and had the media on alert against us, cuz she wanted to cover up his adultery. The guys who ran the White House’s travel office where destroyed by Hillary and Bill just because they were unfairly fired from their jobs. Time and time again you guys on the left have this fantasy about GW being evil, but will let Bill and Hill’s every evil slide like it is no big deal. Well 9/11 proved that Clinton should have taken out OBL when we had the chance, and you still think that GW is the bad guy. Wake up tommy – Lorica

That ignores the fact that AQ was even more aggressive during the Clinton administration, but that requires deeper analytical thinking than most people on the left can manage.

What both PCD AND GWR basically are saying is that us on the left are helping Al-Queda because we disagree with how the 43 Admin is conducting the GWOT.

WRONG. It’s because you don’t want to participate in the GWOT at all. If you had constructive suggestions about how to prosecute the war better, we’d be fine with that. But you don’t. You have nothing except the usual i-hate-bush-let’s-cut-and-run-now-and-leave-the-poor-terrorists-alone nonsense.

That, and the fact that it’s getting damned hard to tell the difference between what you and your leftist buddies say and what AQ says. You both want the same things – US out of Iraq, Bush disgraced, and no anti-terror measures here at home. So whether you want to admit it or not, you leftists and AQ are allies right now.

Listen to yourself:

I hate those clowns as much as anyonre here posting.

That would be news to anyone who’s been reading here. Just in this thread, you haven’t uttered one word of opposition to AQ – but every single one of your posts is dripping with the usual unsubstantiated left-wing anti-Bush garbage – things like 100,000 dead, for example, which is a proven lie.

If you don’t agree fine but it is not right to suggest that my viewpoints give aid and comfort to Al-Queda.

Except it does exactly that. And more, they count on it. And they’ve said so.

So let’s recap: You want to partition Iraq. That will help AQ. You know that, and you don’t care. You want to withdraw our troops from Iraq. That will help AQ. You know that, and you don’t care. From your posts of previous threads, you want our anti-terrorist surveillance programs terminated. That will help AQ, and you don’t care.

And that’s just a sampling. You see the pattern? You see why we reach the conclusions we do?

What you do care about is, apparently, electing Democrats. National security isn’t even on your radar screen compared to that.

Ever hear of Abu Nidal? He lived in Baghdad like royalty until he didn’t accept Saddam’s orders, then he was dead.

Tommy, get your head out of that liberal toilet called the Democrat party.

33, Tommy, you get the guff because you can’t see how YOU hurt this country. You, and I’m talking the majority of the Democrat party, leave the “Aid and Abet” crowd run the Democrat party and YOU expect not to be tarred with their near, if not traitorous, acts.

Bringing up something stated in 1992. Great. If it applied to Iraq in 1992 it must apply in 2007. The only problem with that is 9/11. Some people in this country woke up and realized you can’t just sit back and wait for something to happen.

By the way, Al-Qaeda isn’t and shouldn’t be our only focus on the War on Terror. There are numerous other terrorist organizations out there.

Some questions for you: is AQ in Iraq now? Should we fight them in Iraq? Or should we fight them elsewhere?

GWR I already said that Iraq should be partioned earlier. It should be obvious to everyone that there is ethnic cleansing going on over there.

THAT’S your plan???? You think that if we just partition Iraq that al Qaeda will disband the terrorist training camps, list all the bomb-making equipment on eBay, and get jobs tending goats?? OK, I gotta hear this one…explain why that will happen.

Actually, it’s a horrible idea, for the reasons I listed above the first time you mentioned it. Instead of one strong bulwark against terrorism, you’d have three much weaker ones, easier for AQ to infiltrate and intimidate. It’s a perfect plan – if you’re an islamofascist.

By the way, you’re also wrong (no big shock there) on the ethnic cleansing part. The Kurds have always been pro-US, and now Sunni and Shia alike are now helping our troops root out the terrorists, which is one reason the surge is working so well.

And you’re not even aware what side you’re on:

Despite my aid and comfort? To whom?

Baklava nailed it perfectly: to be perfectly blunt and honest, you’re on AQ’s side. You want our military to lose, you want weakened rump states set up in the ME for them to dominate, you want to cease any military or intelligence action to stop their activities or plots, and you are unwilling to do anything to stop them from attacking us again here. That adds up to doing what you can to help them, short of strapping on a suicide vest yourself.

A week or two ago I posted a link to an article written by an ex-KGB general who defected in 1978. He was very clear on one important point: the biggest thing the communists had going for them during the Cold War was our leftists. They could be counted on to swallow any propaganda the USSR put out, all with the goal of making the American president the enemy, not them. AQ learned that lesson and they’re using the same technique – and look how it has you regurgitating their discredited data (100,000 deaths is a flat-out lie) and spewing hate at every turn against the president.

Baklava’s right. AQ is pinning its hopes on you, tommy. If you and your comrades fail, they fail, and you’re doing your best not to let them down.

But it’s a damn sad commentary about you that you’re willing to side with a bunch of cutthroat terrorists just because you have an irrational blind hatred for one man.