Comments on: Say it isn’t so

By: Liberty Pundit

Liberty Pundit — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:50:37 +0000

Edwards Leading In Iowa?

That’s what TIME says:
John Edwards is betting that a strong showing in the Iowa caucuses will…
…

By: Lorica

Lorica — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:44:14 +0000

Is it possible? Could His Royal Phoniness actually pull off an upset in Iowa? I shudder to think about it â€¦

Did this help Kerry?? Yeah I suppose so, if you consider the fact that he did end up the nominee. But honestly Edwards is so two faced there is no amount of MSM tush kissin’ that will help him get elected. I don’t see how the top 3 Dem candidates are electable. Although I beleve Hillary tops the list of unelectable, Edwards is right behind her. – Lorica

By: Brian

Brian — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:08:12 +0000

Edwards is pretty soft (pardon the obvious pun) here in Iowa, though...some polls are showing Hillary as being in the lead. In fact, the Real Clear Politics average is that Clinton is leading him by 2 percentage points at the moment.

By: Tango

Tango — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:04:31 +0000

Mr Edwards’ achilles heel is campaign cash (or rather, the inability to raise it). He almost HAS to do well right out of the gate, or he’s done.

By: PCD

PCD — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:06:13 +0000

Benning,

I voted against Tom Harkin and for Bill Salier the last time Harkin was up for election. The problem was Salier was not the STATE GOP CENTRAL COMMITTEE’s guy. They were luke warm for him.

By: benning

benning — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:48:46 +0000

Iowans keep re-electing Tom “I’m A Commie” Harkin to the US Senate. Why shouldn’t they fall for Edwards’ nonsense?

By: TedintheShed

TedintheShed — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:59:46 +0000

This is great news. I’m pulling for Edwards all the way for the Democratic nomination.