Comments on: Debunking a study on liberals supposedly being smarter than conservatives

By: Drewsmom

Drewsmom — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:53:22 +0000

Yeah, they’re smarter, NOT.
John Stozel, last night on 20/20 made an utter fool outta michael moore’s sicko joke film. He even sat down with fat boy and still made him look the fool he is. He shot the hell outta moore’s lies and found out moore did not talk to any insurance company officals like he usually does in his lying docudrama’s.
Turns out when fat boy wanted to loose weight he went to a PRIVATE CLINIC to do so, if it had been gov’t run bet his fat ass would have still gone to a private one.
John also had Canadian docs on bashing the system and tallking about the wait time for appts. and procedures for everyone but the dogs and kittens who get state of the art care and same day MRI’S, ect.
Take that michael …. your latest film has been debunked by a major msm and ya all GOTTA LOVE IT.

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:57:11 +0000

LOL – loving the comments in this thread!

By: Lorica

Lorica — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:20:24 +0000

Appearing in the Times as a researcher “not connected to the study”—despite having co-written his similar 2003 analysis with one of its authors—Sulloway endorsed the study and pointed out

So a like minded Berkley college professor is suppose to add credibility to this study?? HA!!

You haven’t told us much about our way of thinking. But you’ve told us a lot about yours.

Here is the other problem with Liberals, they tell us all the time what they think, or feel, but can’t defend the reasons why they think, or feel, this way.

Sev also makes an incredible point. Here is yet another “study” to try to prove something that most people don’t really care about. As if they are competing with GW’s Masters, and can’t. These people are just laughable. – Lorica

By: Severian

Severian — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:53:36 +0000

Even if you were to presume this BS study was true, what does it say about liberals sense of self worth and self confidence that they constantly are trying to find studies that “prove” how superior they are? Seems to me that people with good self image and confidence don’t need such studies.

By: Dishman

Dishman — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:37:36 +0000

The study could be spun as:

Liberals are more willing to accept revisions to history.

Liberals are less likely to have a functioning “BS meter”.

Liberals are more likely to believe what they’re told to believe.

Liberals are more likely to jump on the bandwagon (or join a stampeding herd).

Liberals think more like children.

By: Great White Rat

Great White Rat — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:26:06 +0000

Also, our standard of “information” is a bit tougher than the blips and fads you fall for.

For example, think back to the way our so-called liberal “intelligentsia” embraced the theory of eugenics back in the 1920s and 1930s.

And you know how THAT turned out…it morphed into Hitler’s gas chambers and suddenly all our “smart” people couldn’t remember anything about it.

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:47:48 +0000

- Well I will concede that Liberals are pen uktimate experts in rivised history.

- Hows that “Cuba” thing working out for them anyhow?

- BBH –

By: Dishman

Dishman — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:17:14 +0000

Those are the generous interpretations…

an alternate one is: Liberals are more easily reprogrammed.

Considering the huge number of back-doors into the human mind, I think this represents a major hazard.