in the wrong era. Soundly refuting
liberals online since 2000.
| Heritage | 0 | |
| Reuters | 2012 Watch: Mitt Romney’s message from GOP: Step it up |
0 |
| Fox News | Hmm: Obama to give 10 states a pass on No Child Left Behind deadline |
0 |
| CBS LA | Wha? LA County OKs $1,000 Fine For Throwing Football, Frisbee On Beaches |
0 |
| Ballot Box | AZ: Aide injured in Giffords shooting will run to replace her in House |
0 |
Audacity of Truth
Gaffetastic:
Vice President Joe Biden had his “oops” moment Wednesday speaking in a 49er-crazed SF when he told a crowd at a city political fundraiser that “the Giants are on their way to the Super Bowl.” - SF Chronicle, 1-18-12
Wassup with Hillary and His Royal Phoniness?
They had a little “private” chat after Monday night’s highly entertaining debate:
Hillary Clinton and John Edwards met privately backstage following a very contentious Democratic presidential debate in this coastal city, sources with both campaigns confirm to CNN.
The meeting took place in the Edwards campaign green room.
One of the sources said the meeting happened by chance and the conversation consisted of light chatter. The source added that Clinton did jokingly take a jab at Edwards about his beating up on her during the debate. In fact, the real fireworks were between Clinton and Barack Obama.
An Edwards source noted that it was not surprising the two senators met backstage.
“That happens back there” said the source, who said it has happened “more often” with Obama. “It’s tight quarters – we’re all on top of each other.”
Uh huh.
Perhaps Hillary was imploring him to stay in the race until at least Super Tuesday, rather than bow out now and watch his supporters turn to Obama?
Oh, and I think the writer of the CNN piece should correct the following typo:
The meeting took place in the Edwards campaign green room.
Not green room, silly. It was the preen room.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
11 Responses to “Wassup with Hillary and His Royal Phoniness?”
Comments
Blogads
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of ST's advertisers, nor do their opinions necessarily reflect ST's. Island of Misfit Bloggers
Stats
Edwards positioning himself to be Hillary’s V.P….?
Titus beat me to it. How much will you bet that a deal was NOT mentioned during this casual meeting?
I hope they both self-destruct…
All I know is that I will be voting for Hillary for Presdent in November.
God I hope so. That will just be one more plus for voting for her.
Sometimes a chance meeting is just a chance meeting.
No Leslie, I don’t believe that about Hillary. In fact, I now question every occurrance in her vicinity. The Clinton machine has been orchestrating every aspect of the campaign, often in amazingly transparent fashion. So sorry, but I can’t take anything that happens around Hillary at face value.
And Ted, how many reasons do you need? You only get to vote once- oops, sorry. If you’re a Dem, of course you can vote more than once, along with all your dead relatives and the incarcerated felons and resident aliens. Just don’t let casting your multiple votes interfere with your other duties of vandalism and voter intimidation. Because the last thing the Democrats can risk is a fair election.
The more reasons, the more compelling to cast that one vote for her.
Yes, the Dems do have a poor record of vote fraud along a wide spectrum of tactic. The are crooks and liars to be sure.
Seeing that I am a conservative and not a Dem, that is another reason to vote for Hillary. Once the Republicans presents me with a conservative to vote for, I may well do so.
But you are failing to do so miserably.
Until then, I will vote for Hillary. This is the real candiate for chage, and is the only chance we have to bring about a real conservative revolution.
So Ted, you intend to punish the electorate for not choosing somebody meeting your laundry list? If you can’t get 100%, then everyone can go to hell?
You sound like a libertarian. And I don’t mean that as a compliment. Libertarians are doomed to high minded principled failure for as long as they insist on an all or nothing approach. They’ll never get all, so they’d better get used to nothing.
So instead of petulantly griping about how sorry we’ll all be after Hillary imposed martial law, why not get engaged? Sitting it out and pouting isn’t going to change anything, and it’s not going to influence anyone to go your way. You might also ponder your stated intention to vote for the worst possible candidate (in your eyes) because of the damage she’ll do the country. You call yourself a conservative, but I thought it was just the liberals who actively wished for bad news and considered good news “a problem.”
Perhaps if the best you can do is wish for catastrophe, you ought to opt out completely. Go live off the grid in a yurt somewhere. You can claim the moral high ground without shooting yourself in the foot.
Not at all- they in no way have to meet my “laundry list”. What I am talking about are fatal flaws. Socialist ideas. Poor economic and anti-constitutional views. The fact that I can’t find a conservative among the Republican candidates is scary. Even more scary is the fact that the closest thing Republicans offer to a conservative is a libertarian.
Which brings us to…
Libertarians are generally idealist, and are inpractical in their approaches, from that viewpoint. The are much like communists in that mannerism- it is a utopian approach.
This statement makes the false presupposition that I have not been engaged.
Ahh..I see. If I don’t endorse what I see as an absolutely failed feild of candidates I am “pouting”. From my perception, endorsing one of these mad men is immoral.
So, are you asking me to compromise my morals?
No, IMO conservatives face reality instead of painting a sunny picture. Conservatives are realists, which is why we don’t buy into utopian clap trap such as communism and socialism. We don’t wish for bad news, we face it and attempt a solution. I am attempting a solution to the Republican party, who should offer up candidates without these fatal flaws.
ompetely against conservative beliefs. I would rather face the problems than run from them.
Actually, Ted, I am appalled at your stated intent to do damage to the nation in order to prove yourself right. Be smug andf high minded, but that’s what your position comes down to.