Comments on: “Fact checkers” aren’t always reliable

By: Lorica

Lorica — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:58:07 +0000

Amen MD. I have been kind of curious about that for sometime myself. But if you did that to them, the next thing they would scream, like the cry babies they are, is “but what about Rush Limbaugh”. /sniff – Lorica

By: Mwalimu Daudi

Mwalimu Daudi — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:33:43 +0000

One wonders … since the MSM is blatantly campaigning for the Messiah, when will they run afoul of campaign finance laws? Or are they above the laws the rest of the unwashed masses have to follow?

Should the GOP ever re-take power (a remote possibility at best) they should either (a) force ABC, NBC, CNN, CBS, and the rest of the MSM to register as one of the infamous 527 political action committees and be governed by FEC rules and regulations, or (b) get rid of campaign finance laws, press passes, so-called shield laws, and everything else that helps the MSM get a government-protected monopoly.

By: Lorica

Lorica — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:51:39 +0000

In light of the Glenn Reynolds email can this attitude not be expected from the horse’s behinds that are the drive by media?? Yet there is a constant falling off of readership for Newspapers, and viewership for TV, except where the news is more fair and balanced. NY Post is up readers and so is Fox News. No but these people just keep goose stepping along like the good little propagandists they are, believing all the while they know better than you. – Lorica

By: NC Cop

NC Cop — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:16:40 +0000

Today, CNN (surprise) can be added once again to the list of “fact checkers” who have grossly misled their readers while trying to set the record straight.

I’m shocked……..really.