<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aristocratic liberalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/12/29/aristocratic-liberalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/12/29/aristocratic-liberalism/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:46:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Sykes</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/12/29/aristocratic-liberalism/comment-page-1/#comment-753713</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sykes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=9109#comment-753713</guid>
		<description>The Kennedys went from tragic heros to clowns in a single generation. Must be some sort of record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kennedys went from tragic heros to clowns in a single generation. Must be some sort of record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Skepticrats</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/12/29/aristocratic-liberalism/comment-page-1/#comment-753708</link>
		<dc:creator>The Skepticrats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=9109#comment-753708</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Journalists and aristocrats and senators, oh my!...&lt;/strong&gt;

God bless Victor Davis Hanson for so frequently and eloquently telling it like it is.Â  In this case, he compares press treatment of Sarah Palin and Caroline Kennedy at NRO&#8217;s Media Blog:
But, no, the real embarrassment proves to be the media itse...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Journalists and aristocrats and senators, oh my!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>God bless Victor Davis Hanson for so frequently and eloquently telling it like it is.Â  In this case, he compares press treatment of Sarah Palin and Caroline Kennedy at NRO&#8217;s Media Blog:<br />
But, no, the real embarrassment proves to be the media itse&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Hooe</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/12/29/aristocratic-liberalism/comment-page-1/#comment-753700</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Hooe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 01:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=9109#comment-753700</guid>
		<description>Guess what?  The liberals, and the Dem party, harken back to the aristocrats to begin with!  Check your history.  That is why liberals have an unshakeable sense of their own self-righteousness and superiority.  The Republican party was formed in part through the abolitionist movement.  Liberals are aristocrats in sheep&#039;s clothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess what?  The liberals, and the Dem party, harken back to the aristocrats to begin with!  Check your history.  That is why liberals have an unshakeable sense of their own self-righteousness and superiority.  The Republican party was formed in part through the abolitionist movement.  Liberals are aristocrats in sheep&#8217;s clothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desert Rat</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/12/29/aristocratic-liberalism/comment-page-1/#comment-753699</link>
		<dc:creator>Desert Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=9109#comment-753699</guid>
		<description>What really bugs me is how the MSM is giving Princess Caroline a relative pass concerning lack of experience, voting record and inarticulateness, especially after they savaged Gov. Sarah Palin, a woman of actual accomplishments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really bugs me is how the MSM is giving Princess Caroline a relative pass concerning lack of experience, voting record and inarticulateness, especially after they savaged Gov. Sarah Palin, a woman of actual accomplishments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/12/29/aristocratic-liberalism/comment-page-1/#comment-753695</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=9109#comment-753695</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Except that George W. Bush had all of these, and was (and is) still treated by the journalistic aristocracy as if he were a knuckle-dragging baboon. Partly, that&#039;s due to the Texas accent, as a southern accent is proof positive of stupidity to these accent bigots (unless it&#039;s Hillary faking one in front of a black church). But mostly, it&#039;s because he doesn&#039;t subscribe to their religious sacraments, like political correctness or global warming.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Good point.  He was obviously an exception to the rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Except that George W. Bush had all of these, and was (and is) still treated by the journalistic aristocracy as if he were a knuckle-dragging baboon. Partly, that&#8217;s due to the Texas accent, as a southern accent is proof positive of stupidity to these accent bigots (unless it&#8217;s Hillary faking one in front of a black church). But mostly, it&#8217;s because he doesn&#8217;t subscribe to their religious sacraments, like political correctness or global warming.</p></blockquote>
<p>Good point.  He was obviously an exception to the rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great White Rat</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/12/29/aristocratic-liberalism/comment-page-1/#comment-753694</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=9109#comment-753694</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;it is the aristocratic value system of most NY-DC journalists themselves who apparently still assume that old money, status, and an Ivy-League pedigree are reliable barometers of talent and sobriety
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Except that George W. Bush had all of these, and was (and is) still treated by the journalistic aristocracy as if he were a knuckle-dragging baboon.  Partly, that&#039;s due to the Texas accent, as a southern accent is proof positive of stupidity to these accent bigots (unless it&#039;s Hillary faking one in front of a black church).  But mostly, it&#039;s because he doesn&#039;t subscribe to their religious sacraments, like political correctness or global warming.

&lt;blockquote&gt;A few generations ago, Democrats would have opposed Palin but appreciated her blue-collar story, and applauded a working mom who out-politicked entrenched and richer male elites.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sarah Palin is all about what the Democrats pretend to be, but are not.  Caroline Kennedy is all about what the Democrats pretend to oppose, but actually embrace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>it is the aristocratic value system of most NY-DC journalists themselves who apparently still assume that old money, status, and an Ivy-League pedigree are reliable barometers of talent and sobriety
</p></blockquote>
<p>Except that George W. Bush had all of these, and was (and is) still treated by the journalistic aristocracy as if he were a knuckle-dragging baboon.  Partly, that&#8217;s due to the Texas accent, as a southern accent is proof positive of stupidity to these accent bigots (unless it&#8217;s Hillary faking one in front of a black church).  But mostly, it&#8217;s because he doesn&#8217;t subscribe to their religious sacraments, like political correctness or global warming.</p>
<blockquote><p>A few generations ago, Democrats would have opposed Palin but appreciated her blue-collar story, and applauded a working mom who out-politicked entrenched and richer male elites.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Sarah Palin is all about what the Democrats pretend to be, but are not.  Caroline Kennedy is all about what the Democrats pretend to oppose, but actually embrace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/12/29/aristocratic-liberalism/comment-page-1/#comment-753687</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=9109#comment-753687</guid>
		<description>Well I&#039;m a fan of both Sarah Palin and Caroline Kennedy. They are what they are. They decide what&#039;s right for themselves. They go ahead and do what they want to do.

Do the elitists scoff at the Palin &quot;jes plain folks&quot; demeanor? Of course. And in the year now drawing to its close, Sarah Palin got a chance to meet many of the elitists, and ironically give career boosts to Tina Fey and Katie Couric. Did she make some blunders? Certainly. She&#039;s learned never again to buy clothes retail, I&#039;m sure.

As for Caroline, she&#039;s now going to get a chance to meet many of the &quot;jes plain folks&quot; in some of the parts of New York State she&#039;s never seen. I&#039;m sure she&#039;ll profit from the experience, and anyway, she&#039;ll no longer have to wonder quite what it is that the simple folks do. And if nothing else, she&#039;ll provide fodder for that chronicler of Americana, Joyce Carol Oates. 

After all, Caroline&#039;s story already sounds like one of her novels--daughter of a murdered public figure; years in isolation that created Garboesque mystery; a sudden emergence into public life; enemy of another great American political dynasty; gets her job because of a governor who&#039;s governor only because his predecessor was involved in a sex scandal. 

Write it, Ms. Oates!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m a fan of both Sarah Palin and Caroline Kennedy. They are what they are. They decide what&#8217;s right for themselves. They go ahead and do what they want to do.</p>
<p>Do the elitists scoff at the Palin &#8220;jes plain folks&#8221; demeanor? Of course. And in the year now drawing to its close, Sarah Palin got a chance to meet many of the elitists, and ironically give career boosts to Tina Fey and Katie Couric. Did she make some blunders? Certainly. She&#8217;s learned never again to buy clothes retail, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
<p>As for Caroline, she&#8217;s now going to get a chance to meet many of the &#8220;jes plain folks&#8221; in some of the parts of New York State she&#8217;s never seen. I&#8217;m sure she&#8217;ll profit from the experience, and anyway, she&#8217;ll no longer have to wonder quite what it is that the simple folks do. And if nothing else, she&#8217;ll provide fodder for that chronicler of Americana, Joyce Carol Oates. </p>
<p>After all, Caroline&#8217;s story already sounds like one of her novels&#8211;daughter of a murdered public figure; years in isolation that created Garboesque mystery; a sudden emergence into public life; enemy of another great American political dynasty; gets her job because of a governor who&#8217;s governor only because his predecessor was involved in a sex scandal. </p>
<p>Write it, Ms. Oates!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

