Global warming blasphemy alert

Posted by: ST on January 28, 2009 at 1:44 pm

Uh oh (via Moonbattery):

Washington DC: NASA warming scientist James Hansen, one of former Vice President Al Gore’s closest allies in the promotion of man-made global warming fears, is being publicly rebuked by his former supervisor at NASA.

Retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist Dr. John S. Theon, the former supervisor of James Hansen, NASA’s vocal man-made global warming fears soothsayer, has now publicly declared himself a skeptic and declared that Hansen “embarrassed NASA” with his alarming climate claims and said Hansen was “was never muzzled.” Theon joins the rapidly growing ranks of international scientists abandoning the promotion of anthropogenic global warming fears

“I appreciate the opportunity to add my name to those who disagree that global warming is man-made,” Theon wrote to the Minority Office at the Environment and Public Works Committee on January 15, 2009. “I was, in effect, Hansen’s supervisor because I had to justify his funding, allocate his resources, and evaluate his results. I did not have the authority to give him his annual performance evaluation,” Theon, the former Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA Headquarters and former Chief of the Atmospheric Dynamics & Radiation Branch explained.

“Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress,” Theon wrote.

Theon declared “climate models are useless.” “My own belief concerning anthropogenic climate change is that the models do not realistically simulate the climate system because there are many very important sub-grid scale processes that the models either replicate poorly or completely omit,” Theon explained. “Furthermore, some scientists have manipulated the observed data to justify their model results. In doing so, they neither explain what they have modified in the observations, nor explain how they did it. They have resisted making their work transparent so that it can be replicated independently by other scientists. This is clearly contrary to how science should be done. Thus there is no rational justification for using climate model forecasts to determine public policy,” he added.

Make sure to read the whole thing. There are several links contained within.

This comes right on the heel’s of The Goracle’s annual trek to Congress in order to appeal for more money to research “man-made global warming.” Suffice it to say that Dr. Theon’s claims will be too “inconvenient” for Gore to address.

McQ responds:

Frankly I think the Al Gore AGW nonsense is in deep scientific trouble as more and more scientists join the increasing ranks of the skeptics. The trick, however, is to get the blinders off the media. Until that happens, the politicians will continue to think the underlying “science” is solid and settled and will cap-and-trade us into bankruptcy.

Getting those blinders off the media may be difficult since there is a large “save the world” streak running through contemporary journalism. As we’ve found out in many cases, subject matter expertise isn’t at all a requirement for journalists when writing about something. Instead it is the agenda which takes precedence. It’s more important that they have passion and “care” about something than get the facts right. After all, if they’re wrong, who gets hurt with a “cleaner world”?

And, of course, there’s the funding dilemma which still exists which is equally based on an agenda. For all the talk about returning science to its proper place by the incoming administration, it seems science is still for sale and will gladly find for the agenda of whatever agency is funding it.

Those are two pretty big obstacles yet to be overcome, but this growing groundswell of scientific skepticism is heartening to see. Perhaps it will be enough to overcome the pseudo-science that has pushed us to the brink of committing ourselves to financial ruin over nothing. We’ll see.

I doubt it, considering President Obama has appointed a known socialist & master global warming alarmist to be his “climate czar.” Any remote “hope” for any climate skepticism coming out of this administration flew out the window with that pick.

Not that there was much to begin with.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

7 Responses to “Global warming blasphemy alert”

Comments

  1. Severian says:

    It’s more important that they have passion and “care” about something than get the facts right. After all, if they’re wrong, who gets hurt with a “cleaner world”?

    Hmmm…tell that to the 30-40 million dead, mostly children, in Africa who died due to malaria after the demonization and banning of DDT.

  2. Great White Rat says:
    After all, if they’re wrong, who gets hurt with a “cleaner world”?

    Hmmm…tell that to the 30-40 million dead, mostly children, in Africa who died due to malaria after the demonization and banning of DDT.

    Not to mention the billions of dollars that could have been spent on legitimate research into cures for real problems and diseases instead of being wasted on politically correct snipes hunts like AGW.

  3. Great White Rat says:

    Whoa…that didn’t come out quite the way it looked in the preview.

  4. Severian says:

    Good point GWR, for all the money wasted on this CO2 boondoggle, it would have been possible to add scrubbers to most of the factories and power plants in Asia, reducing the noxious brown cloud and soot particles that actually do have a climate impact and which, more importantly, sicken and harm millions of humans.

    Nah!

  5. Since I am in the middle of an area ravaged by an ice storm, it seems appropriate to talk about the weaknesses of the global warming theory.

    Computer models forecasting global warming are not scientific

  6. sunsettommy says:

    The sad part in all this is that CO2 does not increase any heating of the atmosphere.The heat was already there when a slender fraction of the outgoing IR was heading for outer space.Be absorbed by CO2 that occupies at most 8% of the IR part of the spectrum.

    Here I will post a neat quick statement that I have posted at my forum:

    “From Alan Siddons

    The Madness of Susan Solomon? Solomon: ‘Think about CO2 as more like nuclear waste than acid rain’

    Problem is, the U.S. Supreme Court has helped unleash this madness, having decided that carbon dioxide is some sort of “thermal pollutant.” Yet CO2 isn’t even a heat-trapping gas, as popularly alleged. It’s a heat-emitting gas — or more precisely, it absorbs a few wavelengths of infrared light and radiates this energy in turn. Whatever it gains it loses. But since 99.96% of the other molecules in dry air get heated by conductive transfer alone (after which convective currents commence), the atmosphere is perfectly able to warm up without any CO2 at all. Remove this trace gas from a room, for instance, and there’d be no observable change in temperature. Moreover, since non-IR-absorbing air molecules do NOT react to infrared (by definition), the light emitted by CO2 is unable to heat them! That’s why radiant heaters are so ineffective at heating air. Maybe it seems boring, but zillions of air molecules colliding with hotter surfaces and with each other is how our air gets warm. One molecule among 2500 — all of them competing for heat — is lost in the rushing crowd.

    In short, the sun heats the ground. Then the ground heats the air — but a very odd theory has it quite the other way around. Too few people have considered that 0.04% of the atmosphere’s contents is a very weak mule to load an overheated public scare tactic on. Watch as the legs buckle.

    Alan”

    LINK

    James Hansen with that Physics degree should know better.