<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo of the day: Standing with a President vs. standing with the unborn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/05/17/photo-of-the-day-standing-with-a-president-vs-standing-with-the-unborn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/05/17/photo-of-the-day-standing-with-a-president-vs-standing-with-the-unborn/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:25:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VIDEO: Baby cries during Obama&#8217;s pro-abortion remarks at Notre Dame &#171; Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/05/17/photo-of-the-day-standing-with-a-president-vs-standing-with-the-unborn/comment-page-1/#comment-763696</link>
		<dc:creator>VIDEO: Baby cries during Obama&#8217;s pro-abortion remarks at Notre Dame &#171; Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=14123#comment-763696</guid>
		<description>[...] so fitting, all things considered. It&#8217;s 3 minutes, 16 seconds , and the baby starts crying about midway through. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so fitting, all things considered. It&#8217;s 3 minutes, 16 seconds , and the baby starts crying about midway through. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/05/17/photo-of-the-day-standing-with-a-president-vs-standing-with-the-unborn/comment-page-1/#comment-763663</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=14123#comment-763663</guid>
		<description>Well said, GWR.  ^:)^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, GWR.  <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_worship.gif' alt='&#94;&#58;&#41;&#94;' class='wp-smiley' width='32' height='18' title='&#94;&#58;&#41;&#94;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great White Rat</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/05/17/photo-of-the-day-standing-with-a-president-vs-standing-with-the-unborn/comment-page-1/#comment-763654</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=14123#comment-763654</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Lowering the number of unwanted pregnancies, for example.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And exactly how do you intend to do that, palm?

More sex education?  Won&#039;t work.  We live in a sex-obsessed culture.  Remember those dimwit high school girls in Massachusetts last year who made a pact to all get pregnant?  They all knew exactly what do to do prevent pregnancy, and did just the opposite.  And it&#039;s a reasonable assumption that anyone over the age of 18 knows how babies are made.

A campaign to promote abstinence?  A good idea, but be prepared to be mocked incessantly by the pop culture icons and vilified by the entire left-wing political establishment, which equates abstinence with Judeo-Christian morality - and there&#039;s nothing they hate more than that (except maybe George Bush).  Ask Carrie Prejean what that&#039;s like.

A federally funded program to put no-fee condom dispensers on every street corner of the country?  Won&#039;t work.  When two people are in heat, they&#039;re not going to stop while one of them puts his pants back on to go to the nearest Federal Department of Non-Procreation (DONP) prophylactic center.

Federally-mandated chastity belts that can only be removed by a DONP inspector upon completion of the necessary forms (in triplicate), and then only for a specified time period?  OK, that &lt;em&gt;would&lt;/em&gt; work.  Probably too well...

Ultimately, reducing unwanted pregnancies is a matter of &lt;strong&gt;personal responsibility&lt;/strong&gt;.  Good luck finding anyone on the Obama team who subscribes to that concept.  They&#039;re statists who believe everything - what you drive, what you eat, how much you earn, where your kids go to school - should be dictated by the government.  The idea of two people taking responsibility for their acts is so - &lt;em&gt;conservative&lt;/em&gt;.  :-ss

Which is why ST calls his &quot;common ground&quot; remark &quot;just words&quot; (I&#039;d express it in a bit more colorful language).  This is a man who thinks babies who somehow survive an abortion should be pitched across the room onto a pile of soiled laundry until they do him the favor of dying.  This is a man who wants to remove the conscience protection clause for doctors, nurses, and pharmacists.  This is a narcissist who knows one thing:  &quot;I won&quot;.

He&#039;s not interested in finding common ground.  He says things like that because he&#039;s interested in making Chris Matthews&#039; leg tingle again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Lowering the number of unwanted pregnancies, for example.</p></blockquote>
<p>And exactly how do you intend to do that, palm?</p>
<p>More sex education?  Won&#8217;t work.  We live in a sex-obsessed culture.  Remember those dimwit high school girls in Massachusetts last year who made a pact to all get pregnant?  They all knew exactly what do to do prevent pregnancy, and did just the opposite.  And it&#8217;s a reasonable assumption that anyone over the age of 18 knows how babies are made.</p>
<p>A campaign to promote abstinence?  A good idea, but be prepared to be mocked incessantly by the pop culture icons and vilified by the entire left-wing political establishment, which equates abstinence with Judeo-Christian morality &#8211; and there&#8217;s nothing they hate more than that (except maybe George Bush).  Ask Carrie Prejean what that&#8217;s like.</p>
<p>A federally funded program to put no-fee condom dispensers on every street corner of the country?  Won&#8217;t work.  When two people are in heat, they&#8217;re not going to stop while one of them puts his pants back on to go to the nearest Federal Department of Non-Procreation (DONP) prophylactic center.</p>
<p>Federally-mandated chastity belts that can only be removed by a DONP inspector upon completion of the necessary forms (in triplicate), and then only for a specified time period?  OK, that <em>would</em> work.  Probably too well&#8230;</p>
<p>Ultimately, reducing unwanted pregnancies is a matter of <strong>personal responsibility</strong>.  Good luck finding anyone on the Obama team who subscribes to that concept.  They&#8217;re statists who believe everything &#8211; what you drive, what you eat, how much you earn, where your kids go to school &#8211; should be dictated by the government.  The idea of two people taking responsibility for their acts is so &#8211; <em>conservative</em>.  <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_nailbiting.gif' alt='&#58;&#45;&#115;&#115;' class='wp-smiley' width='33' height='18' title='&#58;&#45;&#115;&#115;' /></p>
<p>Which is why ST calls his &#8220;common ground&#8221; remark &#8220;just words&#8221; (I&#8217;d express it in a bit more colorful language).  This is a man who thinks babies who somehow survive an abortion should be pitched across the room onto a pile of soiled laundry until they do him the favor of dying.  This is a man who wants to remove the conscience protection clause for doctors, nurses, and pharmacists.  This is a narcissist who knows one thing:  &#8220;I won&#8221;.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s not interested in finding common ground.  He says things like that because he&#8217;s interested in making Chris Matthews&#8217; leg tingle again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: palm</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/05/17/photo-of-the-day-standing-with-a-president-vs-standing-with-the-unborn/comment-page-1/#comment-763640</link>
		<dc:creator>palm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=14123#comment-763640</guid>
		<description>&quot;So, exactly what “common ground” can be found with someone who....&quot;


Lowering the number of unwanted pregnancies, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So, exactly what “common ground” can be found with someone who&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lowering the number of unwanted pregnancies, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKS</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/05/17/photo-of-the-day-standing-with-a-president-vs-standing-with-the-unborn/comment-page-1/#comment-763592</link>
		<dc:creator>MKS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=14123#comment-763592</guid>
		<description>In 1859, the issue was slavery.  There were fiercely held opinions on both sides of the issue, and Lincoln strove to promote a civil dialogue on both sides.  But slavery was an egregious violation of human rights, and abortion on demand is at least as bad as slavery.  I hope one day, without bloodshed, we can look back on these times and wonder how we ever could have held the &quot;pro-choice&quot; position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1859, the issue was slavery.  There were fiercely held opinions on both sides of the issue, and Lincoln strove to promote a civil dialogue on both sides.  But slavery was an egregious violation of human rights, and abortion on demand is at least as bad as slavery.  I hope one day, without bloodshed, we can look back on these times and wonder how we ever could have held the &#8220;pro-choice&#8221; position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom TB</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/05/17/photo-of-the-day-standing-with-a-president-vs-standing-with-the-unborn/comment-page-1/#comment-763580</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=14123#comment-763580</guid>
		<description>Obama once said if his own daughter was &quot;punished with a baby&quot;, he would support her choice to abort. Life does begin at conception, and consensual acts do result in the creation of human life, not &quot;punishment&quot;. Or am I &quot;beyond my pay grade&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama once said if his own daughter was &#8220;punished with a baby&#8221;, he would support her choice to abort. Life does begin at conception, and consensual acts do result in the creation of human life, not &#8220;punishment&#8221;. Or am I &#8220;beyond my pay grade&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/05/17/photo-of-the-day-standing-with-a-president-vs-standing-with-the-unborn/comment-page-1/#comment-763579</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=14123#comment-763579</guid>
		<description>The whole thing of “open hearts, open minds, fair-minded words.” merely enforces the Democratic view of bipartisanship .. &lt;b&gt;if you don&#039;t or can&#039;t agree with me, shut up&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole thing of “open hearts, open minds, fair-minded words.” merely enforces the Democratic view of bipartisanship .. <b>if you don&#8217;t or can&#8217;t agree with me, shut up</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/05/17/photo-of-the-day-standing-with-a-president-vs-standing-with-the-unborn/comment-page-1/#comment-763572</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=14123#comment-763572</guid>
		<description>Funding for ESCR seems to be following the path staked out by MMGW &quot;scientists&quot;:  the results don&#039;t have any bearing on value of the research, as long as one can keep a load of buffoons in Congress and the WH to keep funding at ever higher levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funding for ESCR seems to be following the path staked out by MMGW &#8220;scientists&#8221;:  the results don&#8217;t have any bearing on value of the research, as long as one can keep a load of buffoons in Congress and the WH to keep funding at ever higher levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Art</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/05/17/photo-of-the-day-standing-with-a-president-vs-standing-with-the-unborn/comment-page-1/#comment-763544</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 07:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=14123#comment-763544</guid>
		<description>What Carlos said.

In addition, how does one compromise on human life?  Either it&#039;s ripe for the picking or it&#039;s sacred and endowed with the unalienable right to life.  As I believe it&#039;s the latter, I&#039;m not about to compromise about how many or which ones or under what circumstances (beyond the mother&#039;s life) one can do away with the child.  It&#039;s no different than killing anyone who gets in my way, so exactly where can one possibly compromise on this issue?  

And when it comes to ESCR, we know it isn&#039;t necessary anymore since two recent studies found another means of procuring cells that are just as good without killing a person to get them.  Plus the science has shown ESCR to be a dead end anyway, so federal funding for such is completely wasteful in this economic climate. 

Obumble&#039;s just blowing smoke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Carlos said.</p>
<p>In addition, how does one compromise on human life?  Either it&#8217;s ripe for the picking or it&#8217;s sacred and endowed with the unalienable right to life.  As I believe it&#8217;s the latter, I&#8217;m not about to compromise about how many or which ones or under what circumstances (beyond the mother&#8217;s life) one can do away with the child.  It&#8217;s no different than killing anyone who gets in my way, so exactly where can one possibly compromise on this issue?  </p>
<p>And when it comes to ESCR, we know it isn&#8217;t necessary anymore since two recent studies found another means of procuring cells that are just as good without killing a person to get them.  Plus the science has shown ESCR to be a dead end anyway, so federal funding for such is completely wasteful in this economic climate. </p>
<p>Obumble&#8217;s just blowing smoke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/05/17/photo-of-the-day-standing-with-a-president-vs-standing-with-the-unborn/comment-page-1/#comment-763538</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 01:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=14123#comment-763538</guid>
		<description>&quot;Common ground&quot; to a leftist (whether that is Obama, Kennedy, Dodd, Schumer, Pelosi, Reid or any other fascist goon in decent street garb means, &quot;Do it my way and we&#039;ll be ok; if I have to compromise on anything it&#039;ll be because you&#039;re a bully.&quot;

In other words, the only common ground for Obama (et al) is &quot;their way or the highway.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Common ground&#8221; to a leftist (whether that is Obama, Kennedy, Dodd, Schumer, Pelosi, Reid or any other fascist goon in decent street garb means, &#8220;Do it my way and we&#8217;ll be ok; if I have to compromise on anything it&#8217;ll be because you&#8217;re a bully.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, the only common ground for Obama (et al) is &#8220;their way or the highway.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

