<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That was then, this is now &#8211; how Democrats treated GHWB&#8217;s speech to schoolkids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:23:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771963</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771963</guid>
		<description>Anyone as inept and with the &quot;fatal flaws&quot; as our beloved leader has to be a narcissist and flexible enough to put off to tomorrow what can&#039;t be passed today.  He will be back sometime to the children to pipe the originally planned tune, and we need to be there to thwart those plans again.

As soon as he has the children in tow, it&#039;s but a short step to having them report &quot;fishy&quot; activities of the parents to a special hotline or web site.  That&#039;s just another reason home schooling is so important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone as inept and with the &#8220;fatal flaws&#8221; as our beloved leader has to be a narcissist and flexible enough to put off to tomorrow what can&#8217;t be passed today.  He will be back sometime to the children to pipe the originally planned tune, and we need to be there to thwart those plans again.</p>
<p>As soon as he has the children in tow, it&#8217;s but a short step to having them report &#8220;fishy&#8221; activities of the parents to a special hotline or web site.  That&#8217;s just another reason home schooling is so important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771868</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771868</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s being reported now that in his remarks to the kids at the school where he gave this speech, before he gave &quot;The Speech&quot; he was all about pushing health care and sob stories about people with no insurance, the typical BS he&#039;s been pushing elsewhere. Anyone really believe that without the kerfluffle over this in the blogosphere and such that &quot;The Speech&quot; would have been as benign as it was? Even then, it was all a &quot;MEE MEE MEEEE!&quot; type of egotistical, narcissistic little rant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s being reported now that in his remarks to the kids at the school where he gave this speech, before he gave &#8220;The Speech&#8221; he was all about pushing health care and sob stories about people with no insurance, the typical BS he&#8217;s been pushing elsewhere. Anyone really believe that without the kerfluffle over this in the blogosphere and such that &#8220;The Speech&#8221; would have been as benign as it was? Even then, it was all a &#8220;MEE MEE MEEEE!&#8221; type of egotistical, narcissistic little rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great White Rat</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771867</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771867</guid>
		<description>ST, you&#039;re right that the text of the speech as delivered is uncontroversial.  You&#039;re also right that we need to watch what this administration tries to do to education when they think no one is looking.

But Sev, Carlos, and ClassicFilm are also right - in view of the DOE &quot;study guide&quot; and Obama&#039;s narcissism (Ed Morrissey notes that he used the word &quot;I&quot; more than he used the words &quot;school&quot;, &quot;education&quot;, &quot;responsibility&quot;, &quot;country&quot;, &quot;parents&quot;, &quot;teachers&quot;, and &quot;nation&quot; &lt;em&gt;combined&lt;/em&gt;), I have little doubt that the clamor raised by parents and conservative watchdogs prevented a far more partisan and self-indulgent speech.  Considering the left&#039;s educational agenda, that&#039;s something we must monitor rigorously as well.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I agree with you, Sister Toldjah, on picking the right battles to wage. I just feel that this was indeed one of the right battles.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Spot on, and a much more succinct way of saying in one line what took me six paragraphs.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ST, you&#8217;re right that the text of the speech as delivered is uncontroversial.  You&#8217;re also right that we need to watch what this administration tries to do to education when they think no one is looking.</p>
<p>But Sev, Carlos, and ClassicFilm are also right &#8211; in view of the DOE &#8220;study guide&#8221; and Obama&#8217;s narcissism (Ed Morrissey notes that he used the word &#8220;I&#8221; more than he used the words &#8220;school&#8221;, &#8220;education&#8221;, &#8220;responsibility&#8221;, &#8220;country&#8221;, &#8220;parents&#8221;, &#8220;teachers&#8221;, and &#8220;nation&#8221; <em>combined</em>), I have little doubt that the clamor raised by parents and conservative watchdogs prevented a far more partisan and self-indulgent speech.  Considering the left&#8217;s educational agenda, that&#8217;s something we must monitor rigorously as well.</p>
<blockquote><p>I agree with you, Sister Toldjah, on picking the right battles to wage. I just feel that this was indeed one of the right battles.</p></blockquote>
<p>Spot on, and a much more succinct way of saying in one line what took me six paragraphs.  <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_smiley.gif' alt='&#58;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#41;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771865</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771865</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Carlos...this all goes to intentions.  If the basic principle was to work hard and be responsible, the DOE hand outs would not have asked such pointed questions as to &quot;How can I help President Obama..blah, blah. Or, why should we listen to the president, senators, etc, etc. Letter writing and posters are nice if they are letters to tell the president how hard they are working (not what a great president he is) or signs of encouragement to peers to be responsible and do your work.

I feel I talk a lot about my conservative politics with my children and it is amazing how much of that does trickle into their little heads when they are young. They just have a rough time in the teens/young adult period when they are inundated with a lot of different ideas. But I have noticed with my son, who will be 26, that he has taken on a more conservative outlook on life. It is encouraging to me, at least. I was a lot more liberal and a democrat many moons ago....parenthood made me grow up and see the world for what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Carlos&#8230;this all goes to intentions.  If the basic principle was to work hard and be responsible, the DOE hand outs would not have asked such pointed questions as to &#8220;How can I help President Obama..blah, blah. Or, why should we listen to the president, senators, etc, etc. Letter writing and posters are nice if they are letters to tell the president how hard they are working (not what a great president he is) or signs of encouragement to peers to be responsible and do your work.</p>
<p>I feel I talk a lot about my conservative politics with my children and it is amazing how much of that does trickle into their little heads when they are young. They just have a rough time in the teens/young adult period when they are inundated with a lot of different ideas. But I have noticed with my son, who will be 26, that he has taken on a more conservative outlook on life. It is encouraging to me, at least. I was a lot more liberal and a democrat many moons ago&#8230;.parenthood made me grow up and see the world for what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicFilm</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771857</link>
		<dc:creator>ClassicFilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771857</guid>
		<description>With all due respect, I must agree with Great White Rat, Severian, and Carlos. The outcry of parents and other conservatives forced the original speech to be revised, and happily, the end result was not an attempt at indoctrination of his personal agenda on ObamaCare or the Waxman-Markey global warming &quot;tax Americans to death&quot; energy bill. Had there not been such outcry, I feel confident that the speech he delivered today would have been much heavier on the Castro-esque mentality. Since we never saw the speech prior to the protests and inevitable revisions, we&#039;ll never know for sure. 

The lesson plans put forth by the White House, that were posted by DOE, were yanked before I had a chance to review them. But I&#039;ve read from other people&#039;s posts and blogs that they considered them &quot;creepy.&quot; I don&#039;t know if I would have viewed them as such, I&#039;m just relaying what I&#039;ve read. IMHO a small battle that had the potential of becoming Pandora&#039;s box was averted.

I agree with you, Sister Toldjah, on picking the right battles to wage. I just feel that this was indeed one of the right battles. Leaking dike plugged on this one for now... next battles, ObamaCare and Waxman-Markey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect, I must agree with Great White Rat, Severian, and Carlos. The outcry of parents and other conservatives forced the original speech to be revised, and happily, the end result was not an attempt at indoctrination of his personal agenda on ObamaCare or the Waxman-Markey global warming &#8220;tax Americans to death&#8221; energy bill. Had there not been such outcry, I feel confident that the speech he delivered today would have been much heavier on the Castro-esque mentality. Since we never saw the speech prior to the protests and inevitable revisions, we&#8217;ll never know for sure. </p>
<p>The lesson plans put forth by the White House, that were posted by DOE, were yanked before I had a chance to review them. But I&#8217;ve read from other people&#8217;s posts and blogs that they considered them &#8220;creepy.&#8221; I don&#8217;t know if I would have viewed them as such, I&#8217;m just relaying what I&#8217;ve read. IMHO a small battle that had the potential of becoming Pandora&#8217;s box was averted.</p>
<p>I agree with you, Sister Toldjah, on picking the right battles to wage. I just feel that this was indeed one of the right battles. Leaking dike plugged on this one for now&#8230; next battles, ObamaCare and Waxman-Markey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771854</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771854</guid>
		<description>It sounded to me, from the early promos for his speech put out by DOE that the speech got severely reconstructed.  Can&#039;t prove it, but that&#039;s the impression I got over the weekend.

And if that&#039;s the case, the good guys had every right and responsibility to scream &quot;FOUL&quot; and make them back up at 100 MPH.

Our children are the only resource that, in the end, really count when we leave this earth.  We can&#039;t leave them to those who push the collectivist vision because that&#039;s leaving them absolutely nothing except a hard life.

Life is hard enough as it is.  Don&#039;t let them make it any harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounded to me, from the early promos for his speech put out by DOE that the speech got severely reconstructed.  Can&#8217;t prove it, but that&#8217;s the impression I got over the weekend.</p>
<p>And if that&#8217;s the case, the good guys had every right and responsibility to scream &#8220;FOUL&#8221; and make them back up at 100 MPH.</p>
<p>Our children are the only resource that, in the end, really count when we leave this earth.  We can&#8217;t leave them to those who push the collectivist vision because that&#8217;s leaving them absolutely nothing except a hard life.</p>
<p>Life is hard enough as it is.  Don&#8217;t let them make it any harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771849</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771849</guid>
		<description>GWR,  if we were talking about the DOE&#039;s &quot;help President Obama&quot; BS that they recently had to scrub from their website,  or some radical Ayers agenda,  I&#039;d agree wholeheartedly.  But his speech today sounded similar to things Reagan would say to school kids.  I&#039;m all for fighting against a uber-leftist educational agenda - been doing it for years on any number of issues, especially sex ed - but this speech didn&#039;t even come close to that, IMO.  It was pretty much straight up &quot;work hard and do well in school&quot; stuff - pretty standard fare for political speeches to school kids.  That&#039;s why I don&#039;t think battling him giving this speech was worth the time.  If he&#039;d said &quot;I need you to help me pass ObamaCare&quot; then yeah, I&#039;d be fighting, but that&#039;s not the kind of speech it was.

Where he needs to be watched is not in some speech where everyone can hear what he&#039;s saying and verbally blast him if he came anything close to sounding like a proponent of leftie indoctrination, but instead both he and his admin need to be watched with the fine print, like in the study guides and things like that where they think no one is paying attention.  That&#039;s where the leftist war on traditional educational values will be waged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GWR,  if we were talking about the DOE&#8217;s &#8220;help President Obama&#8221; BS that they recently had to scrub from their website,  or some radical Ayers agenda,  I&#8217;d agree wholeheartedly.  But his speech today sounded similar to things Reagan would say to school kids.  I&#8217;m all for fighting against a uber-leftist educational agenda &#8211; been doing it for years on any number of issues, especially sex ed &#8211; but this speech didn&#8217;t even come close to that, IMO.  It was pretty much straight up &#8220;work hard and do well in school&#8221; stuff &#8211; pretty standard fare for political speeches to school kids.  That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t think battling him giving this speech was worth the time.  If he&#8217;d said &#8220;I need you to help me pass ObamaCare&#8221; then yeah, I&#8217;d be fighting, but that&#8217;s not the kind of speech it was.</p>
<p>Where he needs to be watched is not in some speech where everyone can hear what he&#8217;s saying and verbally blast him if he came anything close to sounding like a proponent of leftie indoctrination, but instead both he and his admin need to be watched with the fine print, like in the study guides and things like that where they think no one is paying attention.  That&#8217;s where the leftist war on traditional educational values will be waged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great White Rat</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771848</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771848</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Let’s save our energy for the bigger battles we will continue to wage against this administration on a number of issues...Compared to those things, his speech to school kids is small potatoes, IMO.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have to disagree respectfully with ST on this point.  She&#039;s right about all the issues where we must fight, but we must be just as vigilant about preventing the left from indoctrinating the young.  It&#039;s bad enough that leftist propaganda is woven into school curricula at nearly every level.  Allowing the DOE to issue &quot;study guides&quot; encouraging teachers to assign students to &quot;write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president&quot; would make it even worse.

Part of the left&#039;s strategy is to warp the minds of the young and impressionable as early as possible.  To them, it&#039;s part of the same political process as working for unrestricted abortion and quitting in the war on terror:

&lt;blockquote&gt;That’s one of the things that’s actually annoyed me for about 40 years of being a progressive educator: the separation of the concept of progressive education from the concept of politics and political change. You can’t separate them. - &lt;a href=&quot;http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTBhNTlmNTRhZjYyYjBlZjQ1YTFmNDUyZjYyZjFmZjc=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bill Ayers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It will do us little good in the long term if we win every battle this year &quot;on the war on terror, cap and trade, the free market, ObamaCare, union favoritism, the rights of the unborn, etc.&quot; - and then lose on all those fronts in ten years because the left has drummed Obamaism into the skulls of the next generation.

Lest anyone think that Obama isn&#039;t exactly in tune with Ayers, think of the job Obama did as head of the Annenberg Challenge.  Given $100 million by Ayers to spend on improving education in Chicago, every bit of it went to left-wing racial identification or radical movement functions.  Nothing went to programs to help inner city kids improve in math, or science, or anything that might help them succeed as adults; in fact, some existing programs along those lines were terminated to drain the money to leftist ideological pursuits.  So whatever Obama might have read off the teleprompter today about &quot;learning&quot;, forget it.  He didn&#039;t mean it then and he didn&#039;t mean it now.

Make no mistake - the Community Organizer in Chief sees our young as another community to be organized and manipulated.  The difference between Obama in Chicago and Obama in the White House is the thoroughly creepy cult of personality that he and the MSM are trying to construct around Dear Leader.  It&#039;s not an accident that the mindless Hollywood celebrities in the &quot;pledge&quot; video do not pledge their support for America - they pledge it to Obama.

Organizing the young to become mindless drones dedicated to the state is a fixture of leftist totalitarian regimes.  Name one that didn&#039;t have its version of the Comsomol.

As for the liberals&#039; dark accusations that Bush was using his address to the schools for political purposes, by now every regular ST reader surely knows that whenever a leftist accuses someone of some heinous act - a culture of corruption, racism, astroturfing - it&#039;s because they&#039;re guilty of the same deed and are trying to distract public attention.

So I for one do not think this is &quot;small potatoes&quot;.  It&#039;s another important front in the struggle against leftist domination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Let’s save our energy for the bigger battles we will continue to wage against this administration on a number of issues&#8230;Compared to those things, his speech to school kids is small potatoes, IMO.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have to disagree respectfully with ST on this point.  She&#8217;s right about all the issues where we must fight, but we must be just as vigilant about preventing the left from indoctrinating the young.  It&#8217;s bad enough that leftist propaganda is woven into school curricula at nearly every level.  Allowing the DOE to issue &#8220;study guides&#8221; encouraging teachers to assign students to &#8220;write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president&#8221; would make it even worse.</p>
<p>Part of the left&#8217;s strategy is to warp the minds of the young and impressionable as early as possible.  To them, it&#8217;s part of the same political process as working for unrestricted abortion and quitting in the war on terror:</p>
<blockquote><p>That’s one of the things that’s actually annoyed me for about 40 years of being a progressive educator: the separation of the concept of progressive education from the concept of politics and political change. You can’t separate them. &#8211; <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTBhNTlmNTRhZjYyYjBlZjQ1YTFmNDUyZjYyZjFmZjc=" rel="nofollow"><strong>Bill Ayers</strong></a></p></blockquote>
<p>It will do us little good in the long term if we win every battle this year &#8220;on the war on terror, cap and trade, the free market, ObamaCare, union favoritism, the rights of the unborn, etc.&#8221; &#8211; and then lose on all those fronts in ten years because the left has drummed Obamaism into the skulls of the next generation.</p>
<p>Lest anyone think that Obama isn&#8217;t exactly in tune with Ayers, think of the job Obama did as head of the Annenberg Challenge.  Given $100 million by Ayers to spend on improving education in Chicago, every bit of it went to left-wing racial identification or radical movement functions.  Nothing went to programs to help inner city kids improve in math, or science, or anything that might help them succeed as adults; in fact, some existing programs along those lines were terminated to drain the money to leftist ideological pursuits.  So whatever Obama might have read off the teleprompter today about &#8220;learning&#8221;, forget it.  He didn&#8217;t mean it then and he didn&#8217;t mean it now.</p>
<p>Make no mistake &#8211; the Community Organizer in Chief sees our young as another community to be organized and manipulated.  The difference between Obama in Chicago and Obama in the White House is the thoroughly creepy cult of personality that he and the MSM are trying to construct around Dear Leader.  It&#8217;s not an accident that the mindless Hollywood celebrities in the &#8220;pledge&#8221; video do not pledge their support for America &#8211; they pledge it to Obama.</p>
<p>Organizing the young to become mindless drones dedicated to the state is a fixture of leftist totalitarian regimes.  Name one that didn&#8217;t have its version of the Comsomol.</p>
<p>As for the liberals&#8217; dark accusations that Bush was using his address to the schools for political purposes, by now every regular ST reader surely knows that whenever a leftist accuses someone of some heinous act &#8211; a culture of corruption, racism, astroturfing &#8211; it&#8217;s because they&#8217;re guilty of the same deed and are trying to distract public attention.</p>
<p>So I for one do not think this is &#8220;small potatoes&#8221;.  It&#8217;s another important front in the struggle against leftist domination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forest hunter</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771846</link>
		<dc:creator>forest hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771846</guid>
		<description>As always, excellent point Severian! =d&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, excellent point Severian! <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_clap.gif' alt='&#61;&#100;&#62;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#61;&#100;&#62;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771842</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771842</guid>
		<description>I hear ya Sister...there truly are bigger fish to fry which begs the question...was all this some kind of diversion? Just the way in which the president&#039;s speech was &quot;announced&quot; and the department of education had little hand outs all ready to do...so nice and neat. Either they are so naive that they didn&#039;t consider the content of those handouts a little bit political or in some dark way they wanted to do a preliminary check to see how people felt before they do something really drastic in the way of educating our children. Just makes you wonder....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear ya Sister&#8230;there truly are bigger fish to fry which begs the question&#8230;was all this some kind of diversion? Just the way in which the president&#8217;s speech was &#8220;announced&#8221; and the department of education had little hand outs all ready to do&#8230;so nice and neat. Either they are so naive that they didn&#8217;t consider the content of those handouts a little bit political or in some dark way they wanted to do a preliminary check to see how people felt before they do something really drastic in the way of educating our children. Just makes you wonder&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brontefan</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771817</link>
		<dc:creator>Brontefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771817</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Same crap, different day.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes, and I agree with Bertie; the issues do not necessarily run along party lines.  I know some Dems who are not thrilled with their &quot;fearless leader.&quot;  And neither Bush nor Reagan were anti-American.  Neither of them flew around the globe apologizing for the USA!:(         
 I don&#039;t have any children in school anymore, but the truth is I became an educator when the public school agenda no longer promoted my values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Same crap, different day.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, and I agree with Bertie; the issues do not necessarily run along party lines.  I know some Dems who are not thrilled with their &#8220;fearless leader.&#8221;  And neither Bush nor Reagan were anti-American.  Neither of them flew around the globe apologizing for the USA!<img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_sad.gif' alt='&#58;&#40;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#40;' /><br />
 I don&#8217;t have any children in school anymore, but the truth is I became an educator when the public school agenda no longer promoted my values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not So Far-fetched: If There Had Been No Attention Paid to Obama&#8217;s September 8 School Speech&#8230; &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771775</link>
		<dc:creator>Not So Far-fetched: If There Had Been No Attention Paid to Obama&#8217;s September 8 School Speech&#8230; &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771775</guid>
		<description>[...] Doug TenNapel, Big Hollywood: Found Art: Dear Leader Addresses the Children Sister Toldjah: That was then, this is now – how Democrats treated GHWB’s speech to schoolkids and Creeptastic: Elementary school shows Obama “pledge” video to students Michelle Malkin: Why [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doug TenNapel, Big Hollywood: Found Art: Dear Leader Addresses the Children Sister Toldjah: That was then, this is now – how Democrats treated GHWB’s speech to schoolkids and Creeptastic: Elementary school shows Obama “pledge” video to students Michelle Malkin: Why [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bertie</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771752</link>
		<dc:creator>bertie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771752</guid>
		<description>A fundamental difference between &quot;Us&quot; and &quot;Them&quot; (and that&#039;s not always D&#039;s and R&#039;s).  Conservatives were more concerned about exactly what the president planned to say, based on the released lesson plan there was reason for concern.

In 1991, &quot;they&quot; did not really care what the president said or what the kids heard.  Their only interest was in not missing an opportunity to attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fundamental difference between &#8220;Us&#8221; and &#8220;Them&#8221; (and that&#8217;s not always D&#8217;s and R&#8217;s).  Conservatives were more concerned about exactly what the president planned to say, based on the released lesson plan there was reason for concern.</p>
<p>In 1991, &#8220;they&#8221; did not really care what the president said or what the kids heard.  Their only interest was in not missing an opportunity to attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/09/08/that-was-then-this-is-now-how-democrats-treated-ghwbs-speech-to-schoolkids/comment-page-1/#comment-771730</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=17518#comment-771730</guid>
		<description>Well, if Obamacles can claim credit for jobs that would have been lost but for MEEE! I don&#039;t see why we can&#039;t claim credit for forcing his speech to be less controversial and overtly leftist than it would have been. Goose/gander, that kind of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if Obamacles can claim credit for jobs that would have been lost but for MEEE! I don&#8217;t see why we can&#8217;t claim credit for forcing his speech to be less controversial and overtly leftist than it would have been. Goose/gander, that kind of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

