He’s challenging himself, one of the most outspoken critics of the United States in the past eight months?

Great point!

“In a remarkably blunt address to the U.N., President Obama challenges America’s critics.”

He’s challenging himself, one of the most outspoken critics of the United States in the past eight months? I’m sure he believes this himself as much as he believes in his “solutions” for everything from global kumbayah to the “final solution” for peace in the Middle East (which is the direction he’s headed).

Why don’t their heads just explode?

White House aides billed the speech to heads of government and delegations in the UN chamber as a “historic” address that will lay out a “new direction” in US foreign policy.

LINK

Greenland, Antarctic Ice ‘in Runaway Melt Mode’

WASHINGTON — New satellite information shows that ice sheets in Greenland and western Antarctica continue to shrink faster than scientists thought and in some places are already in runaway melt mode.

LINK

Pretty soon Greenland will be green again and actually start being used to produce livestock and other essentials for people. That ice sheet is a big damn waste of space….much like the space between the ears of most global warming alarmists. – Lorica

As I said, less enlightened cultures. Us, why we’re so sophisticated that when the failed divinty student Al Gore says “Sun God angry! Sun God say, ‘give High Priest Al money! High Priest Al speak special juju to make Sun God calm down!’” we actually pay attention to him. The Professor on Gilligan’s Island was held to a higher standard of proof.

So if the Earth is warming up, why don’t we insist these alarmists provide evidence that it is happening? Dismissing actual drops in global temperatures with “Oh yeah, we knew about this all along – we meant, ummmm, in thirty years it’s going to get hotter” won’t do it. If they claim the sea levels are rising, it is unreasonable to ask for proof of, oh I dunno, this is just me brainstorming here, proof of riisng sea levels? The Maldives have been disappearing for about two decades now (ever since they Paul Erlcih Brigade decided the glaciers we’re rampaging through the streets) and yet – there they sit. No less than they were fifty years ago.

I know, I know, don’t bother pointing it out – I’m a racist, thenkyewveddymuch.

We need our brilliant politicians to read that book GJ Merits, they are idiots and need an education.

Yes We Can!!! – Lorica

OMG, I hope so! Now we all know what it is like to view the Chicago Political machine on target. This idea that not acting in lightening speed means catastrophe is a “crock.”

Hey Chu, it’s not called dissent – it’s called science. Remember science? You know, hypothesis, test, verification, repeatability. Repeat after me Mr. Chu – science is not about your opinion, it is about established facts, you know, those inconvenient truths you and the rest of the global warming empty heads are missing – in droves. Now I would not go and call you a teenager – nope, that would be to kind. A child is a better descriptive for you, Mr. Chu. Now go suck on your thumb and let the grown ups do the real work.

Typical thread that runs through the screeds of all the MMGW prophets, especially Algore.

One of the most remarkable changes brought about by Pilmer’s book occurred on April 13, when leading global warming hysteric Paul Sheehan—who writes for the main Sydney newspaper, the Sydney Morning Herald, which has done as much to hype the threat of global warming as any Australian newspaper—reviewed Plimer’s book and admitted he was taken aback. He describes Plimer, correctly, as “one of Australia’s foremost Earth scientists,” and praised the book as “brilliantly argued” and “the product of 40 years’ research and breadth of scholarship.”

What does Plimer’s book say? Here is Sheehan’s summary:

[Much of what we have read about climate change, [Plimer] argues, is rubbish, especially the computer modeling on which much current scientific opinion is based, which he describes as “primitive.”…

The Earth’s climate is driven by the receipt and redistribution of solar energy. Despite this crucial relationship, the sun tends to be brushed aside as the most important driver of climate. Calculations on supercomputers are primitive compared with the complex dynamism of the Earth’s climate and ignore the crucial relationship between climate and solar energy.

To reduce modern climate change to one variable, CO2, or a small proportion of one variable—human-induced CO2—is not science. To try to predict the future based on just one variable (CO2) in extraordinarily complex natural systems is folly.]

In response, this is Sheehan’s conclusion: “Heaven and Earth is an evidence-based attack on conformity and orthodoxy, including my own, and a reminder to respect informed dissent and beware of ideology subverting evidence.” This cannot be interpreted as anything but a capitulation. It cedes to the global warming rejectionists the high ground of being “evidence-based,” and it accepts the characterization of the global warming promoters as dogmatic conformists.

I think we can do this. I know we can.

Obama warned that a failure to address the problem could create an “irreversible catastrophe.”

Do you think this is Obama being prophetic about the 2010 elections??

Obama said time is “running out” to fix the problem but that, “we can reverse it.”

Now I know this is about the 2012 elections!!! Yes We Can!!! – Lorica