This isn’t a ‘right/left’ issue, it isn’t political in the slightest, please don’t try and make it out to be.

Uh…yeah apparently it IS. I am not going to make nicey nice with my comments and thank the poster who has identified themselves as a feminist for their comments, because if she really CALLS herself a feminist these days she should have noticed how “feminists” are really just ah….’water carriers’ for the Democrat party. This is par for the course for “feminists” of the day who have repeatedly shown that “women’s RIGHTS” only apply to things that have to do with furthering Democrat agenda. This is not an isolated incident, and our poster should WAKE UP and quit being PART OF THE PROBLEM. Their is no mitigation here.

When a republican does something much less egregious, he is OUT, off the reservation and fini. A congressman commits adultery with a consenting adult female (Rep. Livingston (R) of LA) and he is gone. Rep Stubbs (D)commits sodomy with a congressional page and he gets lauded by the left and reelected. Barney the Fag is the most powerful member of congress next to Nancy P. When a Ted Kennedy allows a young sex object to drown while he contemplates the repercussions, the press lauds him. Ted Kennedy American Hero. When Slick Bill gropes a woman who has recently lost her husband, the left and Hollywood attacks the woman. When Slick Bill repeatedly commits sexual harrassment, he is a hero to the left. When a Republican Senator Packwood is accused of the same he is ousted.

The difference is a Worldview, the folks who condone sodomy, “gay Marriage”, group sex, i.e. feminism et al. (Whoopi, Barbara Walters,Woody Allen, John Kerry, Barack Obama) , have no serious logical problem with accepting child molesters (hmmm, might there be a connection?). Actually, an integral part of feminism is the acceptance of sodomites and by extension pedofiles – read Germaine Greer and Shulie Firestone and others.

These people don’t care that a 13 year old girl is sexually attacked and brutalized (the liberals and Hollywood say “she was asking for it”). That is why I am not on the left, if you oppose crimes against children, you are on the right.

What sheer, raw hypocrisy! Whoopi Goldberg and Barbara Walters and the rest of the perverts love perversity. 13 year old girls who are sexually molested are much less important than their political agenda. (Whoopi and Barbara would gladly hold the little girls down for the fine producer – ‘serves her right’ (say Barbara and Whoopi) Where is Hilary on this?

liars, frauds etc.

Those who have experienced the “Treatment” from the monsters, know the situation. I wish I did not.

Oh, and you can not equate this with Mark Foley… this is about a 13 year old child, who was drugged, and raped; he was an adult, totally different.

Absolutely Taylor, I think Now you are finally getting it. My comment about Foley was not about “our perverts are better than your perverts”. My comment was about the treatment between the two parties. See the left celebrates their perverts..i.e. Barney Frank, Bill Clinton, and now apparently Roman Polanski. This isn’t about politics, it’s about the left’s hypocracy. It is about how the left screamed about Foley, and about how now they are defending Polanski. It was pretty obvious what I was trying to convey. This is just another incident of the many reasons that I will never vote for another Dem again. How can I stand in agreement with such idiotic behavior?? – Lorica

Sex is the quickest way to get them into the liberal self centered mindset. So in Whoopie’s mind, all Roman was doing was liberating her. They are also setting the girl up as a “Lolita” of sorts….she single-handedly, teased, charmed and seduced Polansky into doing what come natural to a liberal, especially in the everything-goes 70′s. Theft of innocence has no market value to a film director, hence the director’s couch is an essential way to get ahead in Hollywood. Scum is scum and Rape is Rape, Whoopie.

If it was such a non-meaning and innocent happening, I wonder why?

Part of me honestly, and sadly, wonders if these ‘elites’ simply want a part in one of his films. I am not sure how to feel about that, my distaste is palpable, but is it worse for the apologist or for the apologist who is basically an a$$ kisser trying to get a job with that nasty Oscar winning perve?

They both make me ill, just not sure which one makes me sicker.

He belongs in jail. Supporting his rape of a child is sick. Period.

I agree. Once or twice I have landed on ‘The View’ whilst tv surfing when I was home sick with a cold, and it is horrid… the home shopping folks were more entertaining, and I did get a pretty good deal on a Foreman Grill as well.

I guess I shouldn’t be too judgemental as I don’t watch that show, but it seems vapid and pointless, Whoopies (sp??) recent, idiotic, heartless comments seemed to confirm my theory. I would rather read the instructions on my shampoo bottle than listen to that motley crue attempt to explain the ins and outs of life to me.

But to each their own.

From time to time people need to simply put politics aside, this case is one of those times, and if you can not see that than I am sorry for you.

Child abuse does not belong to one party or another, be they rich, poor, educated, illiterate, doesn’t matter, ever. And to try and make it a political issue is offensive to the victims and their loved ones, who are certainly not worried about if the jacka$$ who drugged and raped their child was a Rep/Dem/Ind. If that would be a concern of yours in that case, get some help.

Oh, and you can not equate this with Mark Foley… this is about a 13 year old child, who was drugged, and raped; he was an adult, totally different. Either way who in their right mind actually plays ‘your perverts are worse than our perverts’? That is probably the worst arguement ever posed.

How can people be so partisan, on either side, that they actually lose their humanity?