<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video/transcript of audience laughing as Letterman admits to affairs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:25:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarheelpundit</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-773631</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarheelpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/#comment-773631</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why would David Letterman apologize to his wife and fans if what he was doing was not an “affair,” alchemist? An affair is defined as a “short term sexual relationship” and the definition at dictionary.com says nothing about having to be married. Do you really think his wife justifies what Letterman did by telling herself that they weren’t married at the time, even though they had been together since 1986?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Great question!  It&#039;s sort of like asking why Congress removed the &quot;Death Panels&quot; in HR 3200 when they &quot;weren&#039;t there to begin with.&quot;  Libs!  8-&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why would David Letterman apologize to his wife and fans if what he was doing was not an “affair,” alchemist? An affair is defined as a “short term sexual relationship” and the definition at dictionary.com says nothing about having to be married. Do you really think his wife justifies what Letterman did by telling herself that they weren’t married at the time, even though they had been together since 1986?</p></blockquote>
<p>Great question!  It&#8217;s sort of like asking why Congress removed the &#8220;Death Panels&#8221; in HR 3200 when they &#8220;weren&#8217;t there to begin with.&#8221;  Libs!  <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_eyeroll.gif' alt='&#56;&#45;&#124;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#56;&#45;&#124;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-773623</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/#comment-773623</guid>
		<description>Why would David Letterman &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,560321,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;apologize to his wife and fans&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; if what he was doing was not an &quot;affair,&quot; alchemist? An affair is defined as a &quot;short term sexual relationship&quot; and the definition at dictionary.com says nothing about having to be married.  Do you really think his wife justifies what Letterman did by telling herself that they weren&#039;t married at the time, even though they had been together since 1986?

Really - why do you always excuse indiscretions when it&#039;s a Democrat committing them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would David Letterman <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,560321,00.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>apologize to his wife and fans</strong></a> if what he was doing was not an &#8220;affair,&#8221; alchemist? An affair is defined as a &#8220;short term sexual relationship&#8221; and the definition at dictionary.com says nothing about having to be married.  Do you really think his wife justifies what Letterman did by telling herself that they weren&#8217;t married at the time, even though they had been together since 1986?</p>
<p>Really &#8211; why do you always excuse indiscretions when it&#8217;s a Democrat committing them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alchemist</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-773613</link>
		<dc:creator>alchemist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/#comment-773613</guid>
		<description>I thought, according to the release, that letterman wasn&#039;t married at the time of the indiscretions.

Not saying that I agree with them, but then they would no longer be &quot;affairs&quot;, they would be sex with employees.  Which is perfectly legal, as long as nobody sues for discrimination....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought, according to the release, that letterman wasn&#8217;t married at the time of the indiscretions.</p>
<p>Not saying that I agree with them, but then they would no longer be &#8220;affairs&#8221;, they would be sex with employees.  Which is perfectly legal, as long as nobody sues for discrimination&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-773589</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/#comment-773589</guid>
		<description>Word is that CBS has been forcing websites to remove the video of this.  

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/business/media/05letterman.html?_r=1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word is that CBS has been forcing websites to remove the video of this.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/business/media/05letterman.html?_r=1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>LINK</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-773470</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/#comment-773470</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s just it, Xlrq, the Repubs trumpet their love of Mom and apple pie and family values, while the jokers just smile and wait for the Repubs to screw up (or around) and don&#039;t &quot;preach&quot; any moral values to get caught on.

If you don&#039;t live it you shouldn&#039;t preach it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s just it, Xlrq, the Repubs trumpet their love of Mom and apple pie and family values, while the jokers just smile and wait for the Repubs to screw up (or around) and don&#8217;t &#8220;preach&#8221; any moral values to get caught on.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t live it you shouldn&#8217;t preach it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-773458</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/#comment-773458</guid>
		<description>The usual liberal rejoinder is that Letterman&#039;s affairs aren&#039;t &quot;hypocritical,&quot; as it&#039;s only hypocritical when Republicans and conservatives cheat on their wives.  Which would be true, I suppose, if liberals want to admit that according to their principles, you are &lt;i&gt;supposed&lt;/i&gt; to cheat on your wife.  Because if that&#039;s the rule, then I&#039;ll grant that liberals who cheat on theirs, aren&#039;t hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The usual liberal rejoinder is that Letterman&#8217;s affairs aren&#8217;t &#8220;hypocritical,&#8221; as it&#8217;s only hypocritical when Republicans and conservatives cheat on their wives.  Which would be true, I suppose, if liberals want to admit that according to their principles, you are <i>supposed</i> to cheat on your wife.  Because if that&#8217;s the rule, then I&#8217;ll grant that liberals who cheat on theirs, aren&#8217;t hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-773457</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/#comment-773457</guid>
		<description>Leftists like Letterman can get away with it because they only pick on people who have stated moral standards and who fail to meet those standards, while the Lettermans of the world have no moral standards and are free to abuse women at will.  Polanski is the crucial example here.

And you&#039;ll not hear a peep from the hens at NOW because they&#039;re part of the same culture, and besides, if the woman isn&#039;t one of dire importance to them, why bother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leftists like Letterman can get away with it because they only pick on people who have stated moral standards and who fail to meet those standards, while the Lettermans of the world have no moral standards and are free to abuse women at will.  Polanski is the crucial example here.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;ll not hear a peep from the hens at NOW because they&#8217;re part of the same culture, and besides, if the woman isn&#8217;t one of dire importance to them, why bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bachbone</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-773440</link>
		<dc:creator>Bachbone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/#comment-773440</guid>
		<description>Another leftist serial philanderer.  Where is NOW?  If Letterman were a conservative, NOW would be picketing and demanding he be fired. And what does his wife think?  Are the MSM &#039;investigative reporters&#039; camped on her front lawn shoving a camera in her face at every opportunity?  Naaaah, they do that only to conservatives.

Are leftist males&#039; wives wimps?  The Kennedy wives put up with their hubby&#039;s serial infidelty, too.  Mark Sanford&#039;s wife soon moved herself and her kids out of the home after discovering he was philandering, so conservative women must be more &quot;liberated&quot; than NOW portrays them, eh?

As Rush says, &quot;They&#039;re showing us who they are every day.  Watch and learn.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another leftist serial philanderer.  Where is NOW?  If Letterman were a conservative, NOW would be picketing and demanding he be fired. And what does his wife think?  Are the MSM &#8216;investigative reporters&#8217; camped on her front lawn shoving a camera in her face at every opportunity?  Naaaah, they do that only to conservatives.</p>
<p>Are leftist males&#8217; wives wimps?  The Kennedy wives put up with their hubby&#8217;s serial infidelty, too.  Mark Sanford&#8217;s wife soon moved herself and her kids out of the home after discovering he was philandering, so conservative women must be more &#8220;liberated&#8221; than NOW portrays them, eh?</p>
<p>As Rush says, &#8220;They&#8217;re showing us who they are every day.  Watch and learn.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griv</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-773435</link>
		<dc:creator>griv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/#comment-773435</guid>
		<description>The laughter I am SURE occurred because they all assumed it was part of a joke. The way he presented it made it look like a joke. He should resign as a hypocrite, apologize to Sarah Palin and make the world a better place. He is a dirt bag and isn&#039;t even the least bit funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The laughter I am SURE occurred because they all assumed it was part of a joke. The way he presented it made it look like a joke. He should resign as a hypocrite, apologize to Sarah Palin and make the world a better place. He is a dirt bag and isn&#8217;t even the least bit funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-773434</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/#comment-773434</guid>
		<description>David Letterman has always been mean-spirited, often sexist and rabid in his liberal bias.  I don&#039;t watch him and won&#039;t shed a tear when he is finally off the air whatever that may take to achieve.  I couldn&#039;t understand the audience&#039;s reaction to his revelation of infidelity.  I guess among some of his post-adolescent fans, it&#039;s the accepted norm of behavior and &#039;cool.&#039;  Another lib-tard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Letterman has always been mean-spirited, often sexist and rabid in his liberal bias.  I don&#8217;t watch him and won&#8217;t shed a tear when he is finally off the air whatever that may take to achieve.  I couldn&#8217;t understand the audience&#8217;s reaction to his revelation of infidelity.  I guess among some of his post-adolescent fans, it&#8217;s the accepted norm of behavior and &#8216;cool.&#8217;  Another lib-tard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-773433</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/#comment-773433</guid>
		<description>Truly sick and disturbing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly sick and disturbing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Americaneocon</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-773429</link>
		<dc:creator>Americaneocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/02/videotranscript-of-audience-laughing-as-letterman-admits-to-affairs/#comment-773429</guid>
		<description>Ameican Power tracked-back with, &lt;a href=&quot;http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/laughing-matter-audience-erupts-as.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&#039;Laughing Matter: Audience Erupts as Letterman Admits to Affairs&#039;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ameican Power tracked-back with, <a href="http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/laughing-matter-audience-erupts-as.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>&#8216;Laughing Matter: Audience Erupts as Letterman Admits to Affairs&#8217;</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

