<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $81 billion? I&#8217;m not impressed.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:46:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773746</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773746</guid>
		<description>Medicare the great denier....how many folks who have it have seen that little statistic?   I guess Grandma better stockpile whatever she can before the cuts and reductions.

The sad thing is that what the government pays out as acceptable claims is the model for the rest of the insurance industry. They won&#039;t pay anymore than what the government does.  So in short, the problem with most insurers is not their coverage, but the government caps.  Denials are not uncommon. Doctors do appeal them and many times they are allowed. SO I am not sure if the denial rate for private insurers was taken as the &quot;final&quot; word or just the initial denial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medicare the great denier&#8230;.how many folks who have it have seen that little statistic?   I guess Grandma better stockpile whatever she can before the cuts and reductions.</p>
<p>The sad thing is that what the government pays out as acceptable claims is the model for the rest of the insurance industry. They won&#8217;t pay anymore than what the government does.  So in short, the problem with most insurers is not their coverage, but the government caps.  Denials are not uncommon. Doctors do appeal them and many times they are allowed. SO I am not sure if the denial rate for private insurers was taken as the &#8220;final&#8221; word or just the initial denial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarheel Pundit</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773729</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarheel Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773729</guid>
		<description>I just about yakked when I saw this on Hot Air last night.  But you&#039;re completely right about it being a load of malarkey.  But will the apathetic public (minus tea partiers and those paying attention) understand that it might &quot;save&quot; $81B but it&#039;s still going to cost $789B or (supposedly) there abouts?

&quot;I just bought a new car and man I got a deal, $50k off sticker price!&quot;

&quot;So how much was it?&quot;

&quot;Just $3,550,000!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just about yakked when I saw this on Hot Air last night.  But you&#8217;re completely right about it being a load of malarkey.  But will the apathetic public (minus tea partiers and those paying attention) understand that it might &#8220;save&#8221; $81B but it&#8217;s still going to cost $789B or (supposedly) there abouts?</p>
<p>&#8220;I just bought a new car and man I got a deal, $50k off sticker price!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;So how much was it?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Just $3,550,000!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $81 billion? I&#8217;m not impressed. &#171; Public Secrets</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773717</link>
		<dc:creator>$81 billion? I&#8217;m not impressed. &#171; Public Secrets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773717</guid>
		<description>[...] As pointed out by Neo in the comments and Ed at Hot Air, the new taxes under the Baucus plan start three years before the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As pointed out by Neo in the comments and Ed at Hot Air, the new taxes under the Baucus plan start three years before the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teqjack</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773715</link>
		<dc:creator>teqjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773715</guid>
		<description>Note that even the 81billion is about the &lt;em&gt;Federal&lt;/em&gt; deficit: large parts of the proposals impose huge costs back to the States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that even the 81billion is about the <em>Federal</em> deficit: large parts of the proposals impose huge costs back to the States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773712</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773712</guid>
		<description>So they try to &lt;strong&gt;over-raise taxes by $81 billion&lt;/strong&gt;.

Oh .. I almost forgot .. &lt;b&gt;There is no Baucus Bill&lt;/b&gt;

The CBO scored the “concept” not an actual bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they try to <strong>over-raise taxes by $81 billion</strong>.</p>
<p>Oh .. I almost forgot .. <b>There is no Baucus Bill</b></p>
<p>The CBO scored the “concept” not an actual bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Baucus Bill: Much ado about&#8230;nothing? &#171; DaTechguy&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773710</link>
		<dc:creator>The Baucus Bill: Much ado about&#8230;nothing? &#171; DaTechguy&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773710</guid>
		<description>[...] Toldja gets it: What a bunch of malarkey. How stupid do they think we are? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Toldja gets it: What a bunch of malarkey. How stupid do they think we are? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773707</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773707</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yesterday Rush was saying that AskHeritage.org had a stat that Medicaid, turned down more claims than any of the insurance companies.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yep, and here&#039;s the source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/05/ama-endorses-largest-denier-of-health-care-claims/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AMA Endorses Largest Denier of Health Care Claims&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yesterday Rush was saying that AskHeritage.org had a stat that Medicaid, turned down more claims than any of the insurance companies.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep, and here&#8217;s the source: <a href="http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/05/ama-endorses-largest-denier-of-health-care-claims/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>AMA Endorses Largest Denier of Health Care Claims</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAS1916</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773706</link>
		<dc:creator>MAS1916</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773706</guid>
		<description>This is after the Obama administration took the CBO to the woodshed after its first estimate on the cost of the House health care takeover bills, there can&#039;t be much credibility attached to this estimate.  On top of that, the estimated savings depends on that half trillion dollar savings by cutting Medicare services. 

Voters understand!  That is why there is such a resistance.  The estimated savings is indeed (from Hotel9 above) a bald faced lie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is after the Obama administration took the CBO to the woodshed after its first estimate on the cost of the House health care takeover bills, there can&#8217;t be much credibility attached to this estimate.  On top of that, the estimated savings depends on that half trillion dollar savings by cutting Medicare services. </p>
<p>Voters understand!  That is why there is such a resistance.  The estimated savings is indeed (from Hotel9 above) a bald faced lie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773705</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773705</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;will shave a whopping $81 billion off the federal deficit by 2019.”

This is a bald faced lie. Period. Full stop.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree with you Hotel.  This is a bald face lie.  You see the Base Realignment of 2005 told everyone that it would save 50 billion in 20 years.  Now that it is almost all said and done, we find out it will only save 5 billion in that same period of time.  Congress was sold a bill of goods, that is and was completely pointless.  It cost way more than it was originally intended, and it was more about consolidating power, than it was actually about function.  And in no way was it worth the loss of personel, and experience for the lack of a gain.  Basically, it was an idiotic thing to do, much like this health care problem.  

Yesterday Rush was saying that AskHeritage.org had a stat that Medicaid, turned down more claims than any of the insurance companies.  Yet these buffoons want me to believe that they ain&#039;t gonna pull the plug on Grandma.  Whatever. - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;will shave a whopping $81 billion off the federal deficit by 2019.”</p>
<p>This is a bald faced lie. Period. Full stop.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree with you Hotel.  This is a bald face lie.  You see the Base Realignment of 2005 told everyone that it would save 50 billion in 20 years.  Now that it is almost all said and done, we find out it will only save 5 billion in that same period of time.  Congress was sold a bill of goods, that is and was completely pointless.  It cost way more than it was originally intended, and it was more about consolidating power, than it was actually about function.  And in no way was it worth the loss of personel, and experience for the lack of a gain.  Basically, it was an idiotic thing to do, much like this health care problem.  </p>
<p>Yesterday Rush was saying that AskHeritage.org had a stat that Medicaid, turned down more claims than any of the insurance companies.  Yet these buffoons want me to believe that they ain&#8217;t gonna pull the plug on Grandma.  Whatever. &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; Spend $100 dollars to save $10?</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773704</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere &#187; Spend $100 dollars to save $10?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773704</guid>
		<description>[...] I am clearly not the only bemused by all the ridiculous hoopla and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am clearly not the only bemused by all the ridiculous hoopla and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2Hotel9</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773703</link>
		<dc:creator>2Hotel9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773703</guid>
		<description>&quot;will shave a whopping $81 billion off the federal deficit by 2019.&quot;

This is a bald faced lie. Period. Full stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;will shave a whopping $81 billion off the federal deficit by 2019.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a bald faced lie. Period. Full stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NC Cop</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773701</link>
		<dc:creator>NC Cop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773701</guid>
		<description>$81 billion?!?!?!   Gosh, what a deal!!  All that AND a completely destroyed health care system??   What more could anyone ask for?!??!  I was SO wrong about the dems.....8-&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$81 billion?!?!?!   Gosh, what a deal!!  All that AND a completely destroyed health care system??   What more could anyone ask for?!??!  I was SO wrong about the dems&#8230;..<img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_eyeroll.gif' alt='&#56;&#45;&#124;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#56;&#45;&#124;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773700</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773700</guid>
		<description>The Dems are counting on a disinterested public that will simply allow them to do whatever they want.....come election time I think they might get a little wake up call.  

And I agree with you Sister, where&#039;s all this transparency that was touted by Obama...oh, my mistake, we are now dealing with a democratic congress that protects tax cheats and has no problems hiding their agenda in an avalanche of detailed legislative jargon.

Simply put....do the math. This whole plan only adds up to outrageous debt on the backs of ALL Americans...so maybe they should rename the plan and call it what it is....social engineering scheme.  They have all the senior citizens scared out of their wits and they were mandated to have Medicare, or else, now their benefits will be moderated and decreased to accommodate the majority of Americans.  How fair is that. 

In the end didn&#039;t the CBO say only 94% of ALL Americans would be covered by the bill?  So who are the unfortunate 6%?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dems are counting on a disinterested public that will simply allow them to do whatever they want&#8230;..come election time I think they might get a little wake up call.  </p>
<p>And I agree with you Sister, where&#8217;s all this transparency that was touted by Obama&#8230;oh, my mistake, we are now dealing with a democratic congress that protects tax cheats and has no problems hiding their agenda in an avalanche of detailed legislative jargon.</p>
<p>Simply put&#8230;.do the math. This whole plan only adds up to outrageous debt on the backs of ALL Americans&#8230;so maybe they should rename the plan and call it what it is&#8230;.social engineering scheme.  They have all the senior citizens scared out of their wits and they were mandated to have Medicare, or else, now their benefits will be moderated and decreased to accommodate the majority of Americans.  How fair is that. </p>
<p>In the end didn&#8217;t the CBO say only 94% of ALL Americans would be covered by the bill?  So who are the unfortunate 6%?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773694</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 05:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773694</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Besides, the bill, or anything looking like it, has no chance in the House.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree: it&#039;s caught between the Scylla of the Blue Dogs who are afraid for their jobs, should they vote for a public option, and the Charybdis of the Progressives who won&#039;t settle for anything less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Besides, the bill, or anything looking like it, has no chance in the House.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree: it&#8217;s caught between the Scylla of the Blue Dogs who are afraid for their jobs, should they vote for a public option, and the Charybdis of the Progressives who won&#8217;t settle for anything less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/10/07/81-billion-im-not-impressed/comment-page-1/#comment-773692</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=18249#comment-773692</guid>
		<description>The underlying problem is that the Baucus bill is that the bill has 10 years of taxes and about 7 1/2 years of actual healthcare, leaving us with a program that will be underfunded by the 11th year.
Besides, the bill, or anything looking like it, has no chance in the House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The underlying problem is that the Baucus bill is that the bill has 10 years of taxes and about 7 1/2 years of actual healthcare, leaving us with a program that will be underfunded by the 11th year.<br />
Besides, the bill, or anything looking like it, has no chance in the House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

