Washington, Lincoln, both Roosevelts, Churchill, de Gaulle, and Reagan all knew a thing or two about leadership.

Being ‘hip’ and ‘modern’ and ’stylish’ weren’t part of it

My hope it that he is getting a very large dose of reality on what the POTUS actually is responsible for..and I hope he is tiring of his czar system. I can’t imaging having opinion over opinion over opinion before making a necessary decision on Afghanistan. But, of course, this is the “intellectual” way of making a decision. Prioritizing is not something that comes easy to a liberal, wait, yes it does come easy if it has something to do with self interest and pandering to a favored sacred cow, but not if the issue is related to building long term security for all Americans. Appeasement doesn’t seem to be working with the Taliban and AlQueda….and now with the Ft. Hood terror attack I hope Obama will have an epiphany of sorts and take a stand for the good of our soldiers.

The sad thing is that we are all pawns in his great experiment of liberalism and I pray that our soldiers can weather this storm. Isn’t this the sort of thing that would cause a military coup in Venezuela?

Right. Most noticeably when he flapped his mug out of order over a Cambridge cop (I don’t have all the facts but…”)

So why is it he can make a snap decision about diddly squat, but takes months while more American soldier lives are lost. (Not that he gives a squat about American soldiers’ lives, either, unless it happens to belong to a murderous muslim at Fort Hood.)

Its a good think we have a President who knows how to properly prioritize things. Very important state dinner with unrelenting media coverage on First Lady’s “stylish” wardrobe first…..decision on sending help to those fighting and dying defending the United States second.