Yesterday we got copied on this message Schlesinger sent to New York Times science reporter Andy Revkin:
Andy: Copenhagen prostitutes? Climate prostitutes? Shame on you for this gutter reportage. [Emphasis added.] This is the second time this week I have written you thereon, the first about giving space in your blog to the Pielkes. The vibe that I am getting from here, there and everywhere is that your reportage is very worrisome to most climate scientists. Of course, your blog is your blog. But, I sense that you are about to experience the ‘Big Cutoff’ from those of us who believe we can no longer trust you, me included. [Emphasis added.] Copenhagen prostitutes? Unbelievable and unacceptable. What are you doing and why? Michael

Any questions why the MSM has been so quiet ?

What is in question here is whether mankind had/has anything to do with it, and that is where the skewed data comes into play.

Personally, it is my belief right now that it is the ultimate in homocentrism if one believes mankind has had any, and I do mean ANY, significant effect on global warming. Or cooling. If real scientists (not charlatans) were to present valid, replicable data showing differently I would be more than pleased to examine my belief, but so far I’ve only been able to detect lies built upon lies in an attempt to enslave the planet because “smart people” should be running everything and we poor, dumb commoners just can’t be trusted to make any decisions without screwing up the world.

Tell a lie over and over and people believe it, I believe that was a Nazi who said that, to take wealth from people who are not willing to part with it, is slavery.

With the evidence of these, for lack of a better word, Scientists, having purposely falsifying and skewing the data for whatever ends should be a huge red flag, worldwide investigations and a complete halt to any climate change summits, lest those leaders who are responsible for their citizens be duped into accords where massive sums of treasure is wasted but that is not what we are seeing, instead we see these leaders focused on those who scooped the evidence.

Frankly, if this ruse carries on from here, all dictionaries need the word “Treason” stricken from their books.

It is Hansen and his co-conspirators who are the Nazis and who would enslave the rest of us.

So what you’re telling us, Mr. Hansen, is that with your draconian proposed measures based upon studies done by charlatans, cheats and thieves, is that the slavery Lincoln fought and the Nazis Churchill and the United States fought were bad then but OK now, because that’s exactly what we will end up with should your proposals become the law of the world.

Thanks, but no thanks. I’ll take my chances with burning to a crisp over pseudo-science, and hope you and your kind have a special place in the charlatan’s corner in Hell.