Comments on: So, like when will David Brooks officially be on the Obama payroll?

By: Anthony

Anthony — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:01:46 +0000

He’d pronounce it “AW-mee-go.” With nose appropriately in the air, of course.

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:59:22 +0000

But Carlos, Obama would never say the word “amigo” because he doesn’t speak Spanish, remember?

By: Carlos

Carlos — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:32:28 +0000

“Chavez to useful idiot Sean Penn: Thanks for defending me, amigo!”

Change that headline immediately preceding this post to “Obama” for “Chavez” and “Brooks” for “Penn” and it fits this post, too.

By: So Cal Jim

So Cal Jim — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:32:08 +0000

Brooks is “four clicks to the left” of a garden variety RINO.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:09:48 +0000

Brooks will officially be on Duh-1′s payroll when the administration takes over the failing NYT in order to “preserve a free press” in this nation. Soon after it takes over the NYT, the WaPo, LAT, Atlanta J-C and most other left-wing unofficial government outlets will then become the “official” government outlets, spilling forth the government’s wisdom as it sees fit similar to what Pravda did in the good ol’ USSR.

Then look for opposition papers to be shut down for printing lies, kinda like Penn’s favorite thug, Chavez, has done in Venezuela.

By: Matt Brown

Matt Brown — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:30:57 +0000

I think Brooks should be on the payroll along with Andrew Sullivan, who still likes to quote Obama’s campaign slogans.

By: Dana White

Dana White — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:26:34 +0000

As has been well documented elsewhere, Brooks is the eternal elitist, forever decrying the public’s hostility to the “educated” class, which of course includes Brooks and his boy friend the Anointed One.

By: Bear1909

Bear1909 — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:16:23 +0000

David Brooks is a flaccid commentator when it comes to politics. He is a daily historian who tries to hit the mark with his commentary as if we were reading a column in the archives of tomorrow or something.

The Boy Queen President in Name Only is a puerile joke foisted onto the American people by a cynical banking and financial cartel looking to do the biggest deal of all time: selling California to the Chinese.

We haven’t seen anything yet. And Davey might as well go back to playin with Pokey cuz he naint nevah gonna see nuttin nohow.

Bear1909 out

By: BR

BR — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:04:41 +0000

Yes,four clicks on a scale of one hundred, that’d be about right.

By: mary

mary — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:01:17 +0000

He likes the crease in his ‘pants’…need I say more?

By: Ragspierre

Ragspierre — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:06:20 +0000

Excellent, Sister. Some of you guys might like my take on Birdcage Brooks, as well. LINK

By: mike191

mike191 — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:57:51 +0000

Mr. Brooks is the man who knows everything but knows nothing.His czar appointments: Lloyd-loves hugo Chavez and wants to cutail free speech: Jennings-tells young gays to meet older men; HOLDREN-BELIEVES IN MASS STERILIZATION; Van Jones-Avowed communist; Cass Sunstein_animals should have representation in court and harvesting human organs is wonderful…AD NAUSEUM..reflect President44 and this is not left of center-it is the outer limits of political thought.

Mr. Brooks ,is no longer readable, he is pathetic.

By: kent18

kent18 — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:53:48 +0000

So, like when will David Brooks officially be on the Obama payroll?

Whaddya mean “when“…?

By: Anthony

Anthony — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:23:02 +0000

Man, Brooks just cannot see the truth about PBO, that he’s a full-blown statist, not a Center-Left “pragmatist.” (That was probably Clinton, post HillaryCare.)

He must be wearing magic glasses that show him nothing but Obama’s pants-crease.

By: Senator Fuller Bull - D

Senator Fuller Bull - D — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:10:24 +0000

Brooks Blathers – Tailored Reporting from Whole Cloth